短訊, Benintendi - 美國職棒

By Victoria
at 2015-10-25T00:53
at 2015-10-25T00:53
Table of Contents
1. https://t.co/cydNu5oHlB
BA評2015梯次選秀
Best Pure Hitter
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Power Hitter
#2 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Pro Debut College/JC Players
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Athlete
#4 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Closest To The Majors (College Players)
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
2. https://twitter.com/redsoxstats/status/657787235622895616
Manuel Margot在多明尼加聯盟守LF─是過去在紅襪小聯盟沒守過的位置
3. https://twitter.com/redsoxstats/status/657288421048778753
Betts 2016 forecast
292/349/475, 16 HR Marcels
300/360/471, 16 HR Steamer
Bogaerts
289/337/414, 11 HR Marcels
293/343/441, 14 HR Steamer
4. https://t.co/J8mpwxMyC2
Brian: Keith, if the Mets decide Matt Harvey is too much of a headache and
decide to trade him. Could the Red Sox put together a package that doesnt
include Betts or Bogaerts that could get him? Should they? Thanks!
Brian: 如果梅子決定賣掉Matt Harvey,紅襪有沒有機會用不包含Betts或Bogaerts的包
裹換到Harvey?該這樣包嗎?
Klaw: If I were Alderson I’d hold firm on one of those two kids, because I
don’t think getting someone farther away like Devers makes quite as much
sense for a team that is already a legitimate contender, but in the abstract,
Devers and a second prospect of note would be reasonable for Harvey if you
agree with me that Devers is a monster in waiting.
Law: 如果我是Alderson,我會死守二選一的底線─因為大都會已經重回強隊之列,所以
拿Devers這種距離大聯盟還很遠的新秀不大合理。不過單就價值來說,我認為
Devers這隻沉睡的野獸再搭一個新秀換Harvey是合理的。
TedT: Since the Red Sox have pipeline of major and minor league
centerfielders (Bradley, Betts, Margot, Benintendi), who do you think the Sox
should keep and to trade to get some pitching?
TedT: 紅襪大小聯盟有一連串的中外野手(JBJ, Betts, Margot, Benintendi),誰該留下
、誰該包出去換投手?
Klaw: I’d work to use JBJ in a trade because of those four he has the lowest
upside, yet his trade value should be reasonably high because he’s ready
right now. There’s significant value in the ability to say to another GM “I
’m giving you a capable centerfielder who’ll earn just $1.5 million over
the next three years for you.”
Law: 我會試著交易掉JBJ,因為他的天花板最低卻又有著還不錯的交易價值─原因是他已
經ready了。你可以跟另一位GM說:「我給你三年只需要$1.5M、能勝任中外野手的
球員」這就是他價值高的原因。
5. https://t.co/AXSFzAtmOm http://t.co/d5Q83Tj8CZ
Chavis, Espinosa等人最近的球探報告
--
*Athletic frame.
*High baseball IQ. Xander
*Smooth, fluid swing. Bogaerts
*Elite batspeed. #01
*Strong and explosive hands.
*Above-average-to-better power ceiling, potential 30 home run bat.
--
BA評2015梯次選秀
Best Pure Hitter
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Power Hitter
#2 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Pro Debut College/JC Players
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Best Athlete
#4 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
Closest To The Majors (College Players)
#1 Andrew Benintendi, of, Red Sox
2. https://twitter.com/redsoxstats/status/657787235622895616
Manuel Margot在多明尼加聯盟守LF─是過去在紅襪小聯盟沒守過的位置
3. https://twitter.com/redsoxstats/status/657288421048778753
Betts 2016 forecast
292/349/475, 16 HR Marcels
300/360/471, 16 HR Steamer
Bogaerts
289/337/414, 11 HR Marcels
293/343/441, 14 HR Steamer
4. https://t.co/J8mpwxMyC2
Brian: Keith, if the Mets decide Matt Harvey is too much of a headache and
decide to trade him. Could the Red Sox put together a package that doesnt
include Betts or Bogaerts that could get him? Should they? Thanks!
Brian: 如果梅子決定賣掉Matt Harvey,紅襪有沒有機會用不包含Betts或Bogaerts的包
裹換到Harvey?該這樣包嗎?
Klaw: If I were Alderson I’d hold firm on one of those two kids, because I
don’t think getting someone farther away like Devers makes quite as much
sense for a team that is already a legitimate contender, but in the abstract,
Devers and a second prospect of note would be reasonable for Harvey if you
agree with me that Devers is a monster in waiting.
Law: 如果我是Alderson,我會死守二選一的底線─因為大都會已經重回強隊之列,所以
拿Devers這種距離大聯盟還很遠的新秀不大合理。不過單就價值來說,我認為
Devers這隻沉睡的野獸再搭一個新秀換Harvey是合理的。
TedT: Since the Red Sox have pipeline of major and minor league
centerfielders (Bradley, Betts, Margot, Benintendi), who do you think the Sox
should keep and to trade to get some pitching?
TedT: 紅襪大小聯盟有一連串的中外野手(JBJ, Betts, Margot, Benintendi),誰該留下
、誰該包出去換投手?
Klaw: I’d work to use JBJ in a trade because of those four he has the lowest
upside, yet his trade value should be reasonably high because he’s ready
right now. There’s significant value in the ability to say to another GM “I
’m giving you a capable centerfielder who’ll earn just $1.5 million over
the next three years for you.”
Law: 我會試著交易掉JBJ,因為他的天花板最低卻又有著還不錯的交易價值─原因是他已
經ready了。你可以跟另一位GM說:「我給你三年只需要$1.5M、能勝任中外野手的
球員」這就是他價值高的原因。
5. https://t.co/AXSFzAtmOm http://t.co/d5Q83Tj8CZ
Chavis, Espinosa等人最近的球探報告
--
*Athletic frame.
*High baseball IQ. Xander
*Smooth, fluid swing. Bogaerts
*Elite batspeed. #01
*Strong and explosive hands.
*Above-average-to-better power ceiling, potential 30 home run bat.
--
Tags:
美國職棒
All Comments

By Ivy
at 2015-10-27T16:24
at 2015-10-27T16:24

By Skylar Davis
at 2015-10-28T09:16
at 2015-10-28T09:16

By Madame
at 2015-10-30T17:53
at 2015-10-30T17:53

By Faithe
at 2015-11-01T18:42
at 2015-11-01T18:42

By Victoria
at 2015-11-03T12:47
at 2015-11-03T12:47

By Rachel
at 2015-11-05T15:13
at 2015-11-05T15:13

By Charlie
at 2015-11-06T19:15
at 2015-11-06T19:15

By Kama
at 2015-11-10T05:24
at 2015-11-10T05:24

By George
at 2015-11-15T01:08
at 2015-11-15T01:08

By Gilbert
at 2015-11-19T22:48
at 2015-11-19T22:48

By Adele
at 2015-11-21T17:01
at 2015-11-21T17:01

By Hedy
at 2015-11-25T02:15
at 2015-11-25T02:15

By Elizabeth
at 2015-11-27T04:31
at 2015-11-27T04:31
Related Posts
Mookie Betts or Xander Bogaerts?

By Joe
at 2015-10-24T15:01
at 2015-10-24T15:01
Jason Varitek, Moncada

By Ophelia
at 2015-10-21T22:20
at 2015-10-21T22:20
台灣有進這件限定版的外套嗎?

By Tracy
at 2015-10-18T10:15
at 2015-10-18T10:15
Pedro自傳有人看過嗎

By Hamiltion
at 2015-10-16T16:33
at 2015-10-16T16:33
Travis Shaw

By Barb Cronin
at 2015-10-16T06:24
at 2015-10-16T06:24