「隔空沾黏隨牽引」事件後續報導 - 武術 Martial Arts
By Valerie
at 2010-06-13T23:57
at 2010-06-13T23:57
Table of Contents
http://forum.gamer.com.tw/C.php?bsn=60444&snA=1840&tnum=19
在巴哈看到的
林先生6/22要出席開偵查庭
好像越來越精彩可期
※ 編輯: larboard 來自: 111.249.139.92 (06/13 23:58)
在巴哈看到的
林先生6/22要出席開偵查庭
好像越來越精彩可期
※ 編輯: larboard 來自: 111.249.139.92 (06/13 23:58)
推 visorkk :那正好 讓大師在檢察官面前實做一次 121.254.64.67 06/14 00:21
推 chind :司法可不只是真假的遊戲... 220.134.36.214 06/14 00:34
推 iamice :想不到會搞到上法庭~ 61.228.245.208 06/14 00:39
推 wayne2003 :個人認為贏的機率不大... 218.166.114.51 06/14 00:40
→ hermitwhite :如果林先生贏了,那會是個不錯的先例 123.204.198.32 06/14 00:49
推 kentbu :近幾年這類自訴案件 檢察官喜歡用簡 114.45.221.172 06/14 00:53
→ kentbu :易程序....簡易程序 被告無罪機率很 114.45.221.172 06/14 00:53
→ kentbu :低的.. 114.45.221.172 06/14 00:53
推 visorkk :這種迷你小案 可能在檢察官這邊就不 121.254.64.67 06/14 00:54
→ visorkk :起訴或緩起訴了 不過這時候就要看林 121.254.64.67 06/14 00:55
→ visorkk :君是否能屈能伸就是 緩起訴 可以附帶 121.254.64.67 06/14 00:55
→ visorkk :道歉喜悔過書之類的條件 121.254.64.67 06/14 00:55
推 NSACSS :如果林敗訴我個人認為是對科學的汙衊 114.42.22.182 06/14 01:14
推 k5d :我個人也認為贏的機率不大. 58.115.166.235 06/14 01:45
推 chind :科學是一回事 法律是一回事 220.134.36.214 06/14 01:48
→ chind :對方針對"騙子"一詞提告 220.134.36.214 06/14 01:48
→ chind :不見得是被說"凌空勁是假的"而提告 220.134.36.214 06/14 01:49
→ chind :不知道版上熟悉法律的人怎麼看 220.134.36.214 06/14 01:50
→ nra7346 :可能要從他當時的全文來判斷吧~ 122.124.65.202 06/14 02:00
→ EthanWake :鄉民:我網路上挺你!衝阿..阿..被告了 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:01
→ EthanWake :不過那個...凌空勁和認知心理有關拉 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:05
推 wjd2001tw :希望沒事就好! 114.45.53.200 06/14 02:05
→ EthanWake :我猜妨害名譽告的成吧 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:06
推 masktrue :所以才說得饒人處且饒人 發言要謹慎 114.47.127.124 06/14 02:07
→ EthanWake :要是我是告的 我就朝認知心理方向打 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:08
→ EthanWake :再拿Systema佐證 能說服法官就好 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:09
推 masktrue :酸得很高興 人家告你你怎辦? 看著辦 114.47.127.124 06/14 02:10
→ EthanWake :這場官司唯一的贏家是其他武術團體 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:11
→ masktrue :我看是只有輸家吧 旁人只是看熱鬧的 114.47.127.124 06/14 02:14
推 wjd2001tw :看在民眾眼裡,整個武術界都是輸家! 114.45.53.200 06/14 02:15
推 masktrue :就有人覺得把別人講賤了能顯自己高尚 114.47.127.124 06/14 02:18
→ wjd2001tw :原因:武人造神!相輕!相忌!無量!...! 114.45.53.200 06/14 02:18
→ masktrue :原來被告的是威力...嗯~不意外... 114.47.127.124 06/14 02:19
→ wjd2001tw :民眾各種想法皆有! 114.45.53.200 06/14 02:19
→ wjd2001tw :多的是負面觀感!少有剖悉正視分明! 114.45.53.200 06/14 02:21
→ EthanWake :好吧,那就改練詠春拳吧~ 220.136.230.87 06/14 02:22
→ hermitwhite :一方面他講話是太隨便了些,但這同時 123.204.198.32 06/14 03:34
→ hermitwhite :也是台灣武術界的共業。 123.204.198.32 06/14 03:36
推 dabaca :台灣真是太有意思了... 71.21.97.255 06/14 04:19
推 loveahate :我是不認同什麼隔空沾黏勁 也支持林 203.217.104.29 06/14 04:39
→ loveahate :戳破他的言論 但看林對陳廖之戰的評 203.217.104.29 06/14 04:40
→ loveahate :論 感覺他對傳武認識還可以更深入 203.217.104.29 06/14 04:40
推 dabaca :這種事情弄到法院好比要法官用判決 71.21.97.255 06/14 07:40
→ dabaca :來決定世足賽冠軍是誰一樣.... 71.21.97.255 06/14 07:40
→ dabaca :我似乎能體會古代走江湖的不當官的 71.21.97.255 06/14 07:41
→ dabaca :道理了.... 71.21.97.255 06/14 07:41
推 bonniekiss2 :是沒官可當140.112.244.216 06/14 07:42
推 NSACSS :判例"法律不能違反科學已知之事實" 114.42.28.120 06/14 09:26
→ NSACSS :當初張穎隔空抓藥跟這有差嗎... 114.42.28.120 06/14 09:27
噓 jock78 :那叫發那篇文章的根那位大師對打不就 59.115.161.168 06/14 09:55
→ jock78 :一切都知道了? 話說我受到男塾的影響 59.115.161.168 06/14 09:55
→ jock78 :認為格鬥武術大師都會像桃太郎那種 59.115.161.168 06/14 09:55
→ jock78 :肌肉男..... 59.115.161.168 06/14 09:56
推 jock78 :不好意思,按到噓...Y 59.115.161.168 06/14 09:59
推 visorkk :樓上沒有關注整起事件吧^^ 121.254.64.67 06/14 10:06
推 kevin751021 :jock78,不能打的人會同意約出來打? 163.14.207.241 06/14 10:26
推 kevin751021 :EthanWake,鄭大師自己說不是心理作 163.14.207.241 06/14 10:29
→ kevin751021 :用,而是一種磁場云云,後來又自刪。 163.14.207.241 06/14 10:29
推 jkwusun :不過鄭大師告威利的話真的是滿精準的 140.96.198.14 06/14 11:59
→ jkwusun :有能力幫威利又願意出手的人不多 140.96.198.14 06/14 12:00
推 bandoll :他自己把洞挖太大了~ 210.69.124.41 06/14 13:23
推 P69045 :是真是假是一回事 如果有牽涉到人身 114.24.195.182 06/14 14:13
→ P69045 :攻擊 那又是另一回事了 114.24.195.182 06/14 14:13
推 kevin751021 :說一個騙子是騙子到底算不算攻擊呢XD 163.14.207.241 06/14 14:34
推 mongchie0204:萬一對方說那我是騙了你財還是色? 61.60.252.76 06/14 14:59
推 bonniekiss2 :騙了我的真心~140.112.244.216 06/14 15:14
推 P69045 :很遺憾的算人身攻擊 114.24.195.182 06/14 16:34
→ P69045 :不過如果他有騙林威利什麼或有受害者 114.24.195.182 06/14 16:36
→ P69045 :出現 可以再告他~ 114.24.195.182 06/14 16:36
推 EthanWake :我沒跟到後續:P 114.45.229.67 06/14 19:57
推 NSACSS :如果說張穎隔空抓藥是騙子有罪嗎? 114.42.19.233 06/14 20:02
→ NSACSS :或是有一個人說他會飛我說他是騙子? 114.42.19.233 06/14 20:02
推 chind :就怕他提了一堆什麼國術論壇的辛苦 220.134.36.214 06/14 20:07
→ chind :來具體舉證他是有實質教學 220.134.36.214 06/14 20:07
推 feelthat :V大佛心來的你也來這搞啊 114.42.132.204 06/15 01:50
推 kevin751021 :張穎也是實質有抓藥,不過隔空騙人 163.14.158.17 06/15 10:24
Tags:
武術
All Comments
By Wallis
at 2010-06-17T23:43
at 2010-06-17T23:43
By Isla
at 2010-06-18T15:15
at 2010-06-18T15:15
By John
at 2010-06-21T23:33
at 2010-06-21T23:33
By Odelette
at 2010-06-24T04:49
at 2010-06-24T04:49
By Quanna
at 2010-06-27T08:27
at 2010-06-27T08:27
By Dinah
at 2010-06-30T16:56
at 2010-06-30T16:56
By Charlie
at 2010-07-02T05:15
at 2010-07-02T05:15
By Aaliyah
at 2010-07-05T15:00
at 2010-07-05T15:00
By Doris
at 2010-07-07T06:18
at 2010-07-07T06:18
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-07-09T23:17
at 2010-07-09T23:17
By Dinah
at 2010-07-10T02:42
at 2010-07-10T02:42
By Ophelia
at 2010-07-12T10:28
at 2010-07-12T10:28
By Andy
at 2010-07-15T08:06
at 2010-07-15T08:06
By Joe
at 2010-07-17T07:38
at 2010-07-17T07:38
By Regina
at 2010-07-19T00:35
at 2010-07-19T00:35
By Kama
at 2010-07-20T12:29
at 2010-07-20T12:29
By Ula
at 2010-07-24T02:17
at 2010-07-24T02:17
By Elvira
at 2010-07-27T06:24
at 2010-07-27T06:24
By Wallis
at 2010-08-01T05:32
at 2010-08-01T05:32
By Oliver
at 2010-08-04T00:02
at 2010-08-04T00:02
By Cara
at 2010-08-04T17:31
at 2010-08-04T17:31
By Carol
at 2010-08-09T04:31
at 2010-08-09T04:31
By Odelette
at 2010-08-14T04:00
at 2010-08-14T04:00
By Sarah
at 2010-08-17T08:44
at 2010-08-17T08:44
By Daph Bay
at 2010-08-19T12:54
at 2010-08-19T12:54
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-08-22T12:34
at 2010-08-22T12:34
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-08-24T21:40
at 2010-08-24T21:40
By Yuri
at 2010-08-28T12:27
at 2010-08-28T12:27
By Delia
at 2010-08-30T05:43
at 2010-08-30T05:43
By Queena
at 2010-09-03T09:09
at 2010-09-03T09:09
By Jack
at 2010-09-06T12:07
at 2010-09-06T12:07
By Ivy
at 2010-09-11T10:05
at 2010-09-11T10:05
By Margaret
at 2010-09-12T20:08
at 2010-09-12T20:08
By Hedy
at 2010-09-14T23:49
at 2010-09-14T23:49
By Freda
at 2010-09-16T02:04
at 2010-09-16T02:04
By Poppy
at 2010-09-21T01:02
at 2010-09-21T01:02
By Frederica
at 2010-09-23T11:11
at 2010-09-23T11:11
By Isabella
at 2010-09-27T23:35
at 2010-09-27T23:35
By Anthony
at 2010-10-02T14:01
at 2010-10-02T14:01
By Steve
at 2010-10-05T07:55
at 2010-10-05T07:55
By Jessica
at 2010-10-06T02:10
at 2010-10-06T02:10
By Mason
at 2010-10-09T12:02
at 2010-10-09T12:02
By Oliver
at 2010-10-11T17:45
at 2010-10-11T17:45
By Rebecca
at 2010-10-16T10:36
at 2010-10-16T10:36
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-10-19T07:47
at 2010-10-19T07:47
By Candice
at 2010-10-20T02:38
at 2010-10-20T02:38
By Jacky
at 2010-10-21T13:52
at 2010-10-21T13:52
By Susan
at 2010-10-23T21:46
at 2010-10-23T21:46
By Adele
at 2010-10-27T13:09
at 2010-10-27T13:09
By Gary
at 2010-10-28T07:03
at 2010-10-28T07:03
By Noah
at 2010-10-29T22:03
at 2010-10-29T22:03
By Connor
at 2010-11-02T08:23
at 2010-11-02T08:23
By Bennie
at 2010-11-02T22:45
at 2010-11-02T22:45
By George
at 2010-11-06T18:43
at 2010-11-06T18:43
By Irma
at 2010-11-08T18:28
at 2010-11-08T18:28
By William
at 2010-11-13T06:20
at 2010-11-13T06:20
By Kelly
at 2010-11-15T05:35
at 2010-11-15T05:35
By Selena
at 2010-11-15T07:20
at 2010-11-15T07:20
By Una
at 2010-11-15T09:33
at 2010-11-15T09:33
By George
at 2010-11-16T03:16
at 2010-11-16T03:16
By Jacky
at 2010-11-16T14:31
at 2010-11-16T14:31
By Eden
at 2010-11-17T09:34
at 2010-11-17T09:34
Related Posts
如何判斷老師?
By Zora
at 2010-06-12T23:45
at 2010-06-12T23:45
如何判斷老師?
By Oscar
at 2010-06-12T11:39
at 2010-06-12T11:39
如何判斷老師?
By William
at 2010-06-12T11:01
at 2010-06-12T11:01
如何判斷老師?
By Isla
at 2010-06-12T06:25
at 2010-06-12T06:25
如何判斷老師?
By Victoria
at 2010-06-12T03:29
at 2010-06-12T03:29