Nadal對小火車... - 網球 Tennis

Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2010-11-27T09:10

Table of Contents

當事人說法 XD

http://www.tennis.com/articles/templates/news.aspx?articleid=9072&zoneid=25

With Nadal trailing 6-5, Berdych’s backhand was called out by Brazilian
umpire Carlos Bernardes, but Nadal had returned the ball in play. Berdych
challenged the call, which confirmed the ball was actually in. The Czech
player was then awarded the point.

6-5的時候,Berdych的反拍被巴西主審判決出界,但Nadal已經回球,Berdych挑戰
判決,結果是in,捷克選手獲得該分。

Nadal was convinced the point should have been replayed, and ranted first at
Bernardes and then at the tournament supervisor sitting in the front row of
the crowd, to no avail.

Nadal認為應該要重打,而且向主審Bernardes抗議之後,再向坐在場邊第一排的賽事
監督抗議。

“There is no argument,” Nadal said. “I am right, but it’s (a) mistake for
him. But he is a great umpire and everybody (makes) a mistake.”

Nadal說法:沒有爭議,我是對的,這是他的錯誤,但他是個好主審,人人都會犯錯。

Berdych said he thought Nadal had stopped playing to indicate the ball was
out, and that the umpire was correct to give him the point.

Berdych說他認為Nadal已經停止擊球並指出該球出界,主審給他那分是對的。

“The referee is probably scared of him and just let him to talk with him too
long,” Berdych said. “He was able to play. But every time when you just
raise your hand, that means that you stop the play.”

Berdych說法:裁判大概怕了他,讓他跟他說這麼久,他可以打。但每次當你舉起手來,
就代表你停止那球的進行。


--
Tags: 網球

All Comments

Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2010-11-29T23:47
跟我看到的情形一樣...這分是應該要重打~~畢竟Nadal也有打進 而不是認為Out而不打
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2010-12-02T14:24
我是覺得雙方都有盲點~
Mason avatar
By Mason
at 2010-12-05T05:01
Berdych 不意外
Andy avatar
By Andy
at 2010-12-07T19:38
我覺得對手一號應該是Soderling XD
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2010-12-10T10:14
啊 回錯篇了 sorry
George avatar
By George
at 2010-12-13T00:51
推There is no argument~
Selena avatar
By Selena
at 2010-12-15T15:28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VywZYrxm1t8影片很明顯納豆舉手疑惑的同時主審自己就改判了
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2010-12-18T06:05
而且小火車也可以不用這樣說吧,"主審怕了他"
Oliver avatar
By Oliver
at 2010-12-20T20:42
sleeeve... aceral1916... XD
Isabella avatar
By Isabella
at 2010-12-23T11:19
Berdych是覺得裁判讓Nadal爭論太久了,應該適時制止
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2010-12-26T01:55
Nadal打完球沒看主審就轉頭了,所以他是認為Out而不打啊
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2010-12-28T16:32
我發現主審手有縮一下,看到Nadal舉手才說Out,這哪招XD
Zenobia avatar
By Zenobia
at 2010-12-31T07:09
先中斷比賽進行的是Nadal,而不是主審的判決
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2011-01-02T21:46
Berych說那句大概有點開玩笑吧XD
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2011-01-05T12:23
但他後面還有說他認為主審不該讓納豆覺得在場上想做什麼就做什麼,都已經得了便宜還這樣orz
Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2011-01-08T03:00
沒有想做什麼就做什麼 爭取應該得到的是應該的
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2011-01-10T17:36
得了便宜?這個判決給了Rafa什麼便宜?
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2011-01-13T08:13
Nadal不會用這種小技巧取勝 畢竟他實力高上一大截
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2011-01-15T22:50
"得了便宜" 應該是t版友說Berdych得了便宜還這樣說~
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2011-01-18T13:27
Nadal中間好像有說,那他不想打了(用西班牙文)
Ina avatar
By Ina
at 2011-01-21T04:04
不是Rafa,是說ber
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2011-01-23T18:41
本來覺得以小火車的立場認為是對方停下(雖然是主審)改判)仍可理解,但他不斷針對納豆去理論的時間頗有微詞感覺很不好啦
Dora avatar
By Dora
at 2011-01-26T09:17
主審本來就應該控制Nadal爭論的時間~
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2011-01-28T23:54
主審:沒辦法 那天給NOLE一點時間去換眼鏡 還一點回去XD
Ina avatar
By Ina
at 2011-01-31T14:31
sorry t大,偶看錯你的意思了
Odelette avatar
By Odelette
at 2011-02-03T05:08
雖然我喜歡Rafa 但我也覺得主審不該讓他爭論這麼久
Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2011-02-05T19:45
no mind:) 外電敘述都是強調主屬的判決+納豆有打回去
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2011-02-08T10:22
控制時間當然是應該,但用什麼話來形容差很多拉我覺得
Valerie avatar
By Valerie
at 2011-02-11T00:58
也許其實Berdych不滿的是裁判,不是Rafa?這件事感覺裁判處理的有點問題
Heather avatar
By Heather
at 2011-02-13T15:35
Nadal爭論的時候,Berdych覺得很無聊吧,都講西班牙文他也聽不懂~
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2011-02-16T06:12
Carlos Bernades 應該跟Nadal滿熟的 他第一場比賽就是
Harry avatar
By Harry
at 2011-02-18T20:49
Nadal15遂在西班牙的挑戰賽:P
Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2011-02-21T11:26
完全是主審的問題 納豆都要挑戰了 他幹嘛脫褲子放屁改判

Nadal對小火車...

Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2010-11-27T05:47
先感謝有版友告訴我到底小火車是誰 湯瑪斯這名子真的是小火車沒錯  -___-" 接下來這篇有版友說很少看到好脾氣的納豆這麼火 推 aaboutt:很少看到Nadal這麼生氣 結果他變得更專住了11/26 23:35 推 singlecolor:剛剛真的被嚇到 atat 沒看過納豆那麼火11/26 23:3 ...

A.Roddick vs N.Djokovic

Agatha avatar
By Agatha
at 2010-11-27T04:33
set1 set2 A.Roddick 2 3 N.Djokovic 6 6 看來應該還是F4交叉廝殺........... 應該是Nadal vs Murray, Djo vs Fed.... - ...

年終賽Roddick vs Djokovic

Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2010-11-27T04:05
基本上Roddick必須贏球且要直落二才能晉級 輸了的話不管兩盤還是三盤都會被淘汰 加油!!!!!! - ...

Nadal對小火車...

Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2010-11-27T00:48
我覺得問題不是在誰用了鷹眼挑戰 ㄧ開始納豆質疑了這分作出停止的動作 網球的規則就是這分如果是in就納豆丟分 如果out就納豆得分 要判別in或out有可能是看球印(紅土)或是看鷹眼(如果這個球場有鷹眼) 或是線審與主審的最後主觀認定 不過決定這一分誰得分只跟這球最後in或out有關 由主審來利用 ...

Nadal對小火車...

Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2010-11-26T23:56
※ 引述《jacky6302 (劫機)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《gundom ( gundoom)》之銘言: : : 是說現在都沒人再看就對了? : : 剛剛閃神一下 : : 回頭就看到納豆衝到場邊跟大會的人大聲爭論 : : 這真的是很難得的景象...atat : : 不過有沒有人能告訴我剛剛發生了啥事? : ...