ZM對本場比賽的分析 - 利物浦足球俱樂部 Liverpool Football Club

※ [本文轉錄自 Arsenal 看板 #1I-uJUh5 ]

作者: prononhead (貝爾格萊德紅星) 看板: Arsenal
標題: [情報] ZM對本場比賽的分析
時間: Wed Feb 12 22:27:35 2014


原文位置:
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2014/02/10/liverpool-5-1-arsenal-game-over-after-20-minutes-thanks-to-superb-one-touch-football/


分享一下ZM對這場比賽的分析，老實說太早失球真的讓戰術面沒有太多發揮空間...
唉唉。

-------

Liverpool 5-1 Arsenal: game over after 20 minutes thanks to superb one-touch
football

利物浦 5:1 兵工廠:拜利物浦的”一腳球”表現，二十分鐘內比賽就不再有懸念。
February 10, 2014

Liverpool produced the best spell of football the Premier League has seen
this season, and recorded a crushing victory over the (former) league leaders.

利物浦在本場堪稱締造本季最棒的足球魔法，同時完勝(前)榜首。

Brendan Rodgers named an unchanged side, despite the option of fit-again Joe
Allen. He’s still without four key defenders.

羅傑斯並沒有調整他的先發名單，即使喬愛倫已經可以出賽。他手上仍有四名關鍵後衛缺
陣。

Arsene Wenger brought Jack Wilshere into the side, moving Alex
Oxlade-Chamberlain out to the right flank. Nacho Monreal continued at
left-back.

溫格則把威脅兒列入先發名單，同時讓小張改打右邊路，真萌則繼續鎮守左邊後衛。

This was such a convincing victory, and the game was won so quickly, that it
almost defies analysis. Liverpool established their lead from two set-pieces
but continually opened up Arsenal in open play, and were always ready to
pounce on the counter-attack.

因為這場比賽贏的毫無懸念，又這麼快鎖定勝局，讓人幾乎無從分析起。利物浦靠著兩個
定位球領先，又在運動戰中持續扯開兵工廠的防線，並且總是準備好發動反擊。

Set-pieces
定位球

Liverpool’s first two goals were scored from set-pieces, a result of poor
Arsenal marking, and Steven Gerrard’s excellent set-piece delivery. In this
sense, there was a similarity to Liverpool’s recent win over Everton at
Anfield, where Gerrard himself nodded home the opener to put Liverpool in
command.

利物浦的頭兩球是定位球進球─兵工廠糟糕的定位球防守，還有傑拉德出色的傳球造成了
這結果。從這兩個要素來看，與利物浦最近在安菲爾德對埃弗頓的勝利有些近似。當時傑
拉德自己替主隊首開紀錄，並且使利物浦掌握大局。

By going 2-0 up from two dead ball situations, Liverpool had essentially
earned the chance to play on the counter, and while it isn’t the most
attractive thing about this performance, it’s worth underlining the
importance of those set-pieces to break the deadlock. In fact, Liverpool have
scored 17 set-piece goals in the Premier League this season, three more than
any other side (and, by way of comparison with their opponents here) 12 more
than Arsenal.

在開局2-0的優勢下，利物浦獲得了許多機會進行防守反擊。另外，雖然不是本場最吸引
人的表現，兩個打破僵局的定位球仍然十分重要。實際上，本季利物浦已經進了17個定位
球進球，領先第二名3球，領先兵工廠則有12球之多。

To a certain extent this is separate from the overall tactical battle, but
being punished so immediately had an obvious impact upon the confidence
levels of Arsenal, and put Liverpool in charge.

某種程度來說，士氣與戰術層面的對抗可以分開，但是兵工廠確實因為早期的失球喪失信
心，使得利物浦獲得了場面的控制權。

Liverpool being ahead from the second minute meant it was impossible to
analyse the sides’ starting strategies. In all probability, the game would
have taken on a similar pattern – but Arsenal immediately had to chase the
game, and Liverpool could afford to be reactive.

利物浦在比賽第二分鐘就獲得領先，使分析兩隊開場階段的策略變得幾乎不可能。雖然比
賽多半還是會以類似的模式進行，但兵工廠早早落後必須追趕比賽，相對的利物浦卻能游
刃有餘的保持被動態勢。

Particularly impressive about Liverpool’s first-half performance was the way
they continued to attack relentlessly rather than killing the game with
possession dominance. This was partly due to the type of players they used in
midfield – with Steven Gerrard knocking diagonals to the flanks, Coutinho
supplying neat through-balls and Jordan Henderson charging forward into
attack. The omission of Allen was a slight surprise given Arsenal’s midfield
quality, and on another day Steven Gerrard would have been overloaded between
the lines.

讓人特別印象深刻的是，利物浦在上半場領先後，持續的保持攻勢，而非選擇持續控球。
這有一部分與利物浦的中場球員選擇有關，傑拉德往邊上斜跑、庫迪尼奧供應穿越球還有
韓德森前插進攻。在兵工廠中場球員的質量優勢下，沒有選擇喬愛倫讓人有些驚訝，若非
今日的狀況，傑拉德很可能早就被壓垮了。(這裡用的Overload應該是指，以位置來看傑
拉德可能要面對為數眾多的兵工廠中場球員)

In fact, the frantic nature of the early exchanges gave Arsenal opportunities
to break themselves – in the second minute, Arsenal attacked 4 v 4 and
Skrtel found himself making a last-man tackle on Giroud to prevent a
one-on-one. This was arguably even more crucial than his headed opener,
considering the consequences had he brought down the Frenchman. Giroud lacked
the burst of speed so obvious at the other end in the coming minutes.

事實上早期的一些交手使兵工廠有機會打破僵局，例如第二分鐘時，兵工廠在四對四的進
攻事態中，斯柯特對吉魯成功的搶斷，解決了一次單刀的機會。這次搶斷從事後來看可能
比他進的頭球還要重要─因為如果他真的把吉魯放倒，後果可能相當嚴重。而吉魯相對的
在接下來的一陣子則明顯地欠缺衝刺速度。

But Liverpool justified Rodgers’ brave approach with their stunning
attacking play, repeatedly cutting through Arsenal, who always had too many
men in advance of the ball when moves broke down – a consequence of them
chasing the game from an early stage.

但是利物浦用他們出色的進攻表現，回報了羅傑斯大膽的選擇。利物浦持續的打穿兵工廠
防線，他們總是投入太多進攻兵力，因此掉球時沒有足夠的人員防守─這也是早期失球的
造成的結果。

Arsenal errors
兵工廠犯的錯誤

The game state shouldn’t excuse Arsenal’s blatant errors throughout the
game, particularly their sloppiness in possession. However, Liverpool can
take a large amount of credit for winning the ball so regularly in midfield,
because their pressing throughout the first 20 minutes was extremely intense.
Henderson always seems to press effectively against Arsenal from a central
position, and Coutinho continues to impress in a slightly deeper role where he
’s battling as much as creating.

但是整場比賽的走勢，不該成為兵工廠失誤的藉口。兵工廠在本場比賽犯下糟糕的失誤，
尤其是在持球方面的糟糕表現。然而利物浦持續成功地搶斷，也值得讚揚，他們在比賽頭
二十分鐘的壓迫非常的激烈。韓德森總是在中間位置有效的壓迫，庫迪尼奧則在比較深的
位置，他也表現出與創造力相當的拼鬥精神。

Ozil v Gerrard would have been Rodgers’ main concern before the game, but
simply by shutting him down quickly, Liverpool coped nicely. Although
Liverpool’s defensive record this season isn’t particularly good, they
appear to be excellent at highlighting and negating the threat of the
opposition dangerman – they also did a good job on Yaya Toure earlier in the
campaign, and surrounded Ozil here. Gerrard played a more physical role than
usual, notably using his strength to unsettle Arsenal’s midfield.

272與傑拉德的對抗本應為羅傑斯賽前主要的考量，但是利物浦很成功地守住了272。雖然
利物浦本季的防守表現並不是特別好，他們在壓迫、針對性的防守對手關鍵球員上，卻表
現得非常出色─就如同他們早先對Yaya Toure，還有對272的防守。傑拉德在本場比賽擔
當了比平常更多身體對抗的腳色，特別是利用他的力量，擾亂兵工廠的中場球員。

Indeed, Ozil was dispossessed for Liverpool’s third and fourth goals (and
for the move that resulted in Sturridge missing a one-on-one at 2-0) and
because Arsenal’s system depends on good ball retention to get the
full-backs forward and pin sides back, they were in an awful defensive
position, unable to defend Liverpool’s quick breaks, and particularly
vulnerable to the pace of Liverpool’s three attackers.

確實，因為272的掉球，造成了利物浦第3和第4個進球(還有造成司徒里奇一次單刀機會)
，也因為兵工廠的系統仰賴成功的持球，讓兩邊衛能夠上前進攻，壓制對方的兩翼，本場
比賽只要掉球，兵工廠就會陷入很糟的防守事態，無法防禦利物浦的快速突破，特別是難
以面對利物浦的三個快腿攻擊手。

That said, the advanced positioning of the Arsenal full-backs nearly resulted
in an early equaliser, when Monreal’s run in behind resulted in a mix-up
between Simon Mignolet and Jon Flanagan. Arsenal need direct running from
full-back without Theo Walcott or Lukas Podolski, so it’s not unreasonable
for them to play so high up the pitch.

話雖如此，兵工廠後衛的前壓，也差點迅速扳平比分─真萌一次身後跑動，就讓明尼奧萊
跟弗拉納甘亂成一團。其實在兵工廠沒有哇靠或是波弟的情況下，確實仰賴邊後衛向球門
前插，也就不難理解為什麼兵工廠的隊形推的這麼前面。

Liverpool attacks
利物浦的進攻

However, they probably took it too far. Liverpool used the ball extremely
quickly, often looking to their right flank, because Santi Cazorla had
drifted inside and created room to break into. Sturridge cut inside and shot
from range, before Flanagan supported Sturridge him brilliantly on another
quick attack, which led to the corner for Skrtel’s second goal. The third
came from the right, too, with Suarez assisting Coutinho – both assist and
shot were played first-time.

然而兵工廠推得太深了。利物浦在本場比賽，極端的追求傳球進攻的速度。通常他們在右
路尋找空檔，因為三弟往中間拉，給司徒里奇留下了空間切入。司徒里奇的內切與長射都
是利用這個空檔，而後弗拉納甘在另一次快攻中上前支援，造成了一次角球，並且最終由
斯科特頂進他的第二球。第三球也是從右翼發動，這一次是由蘇亞雷斯助攻庫迪尼奧─不
論傳射都是第一時間。

The chance Sturridge missed at 2-0 was actually a better representation of
Liverpool’s play than any of their goals – they won the ball quickly in
midfield, Coutinho immediately chipped the ball to Suarez who touched it into
the path of Sturridge. Arsenal shouldn’t have conceded possession but it’s
difficult to see how they could have defended any better – Per Mertesacker
wasn’t in a very good position but probably would have been outpaced anyway.
Again, it was just stunning, one-touch passing football from the home side,
following good midfield pressure, and the same was true of the fourth goal.

但司徒里奇在2-0時錯過的那次機會，卻比其他進球更能代表利物浦本場的打法。他們在
中場快速獲得球權，庫迪尼奧將球搓傳給蘇亞雷斯，蘇亞雷斯把球點給司徒里奇。這次兵
工廠不該失球，但是除此之外在防守上，也很難看出兵工廠還有什麼辦法防守的更好─模
特的狀態不是非常好，但是即使狀態良好，他也很可能追不上司徒里奇。利物浦的一腳傳
打得驚人的好，加以中場的施壓做得很好，這個模式與第四個進球是相同的。

Amazingly, Arsenal managed to prevent Suarez from scoring – he came closest
from scorching long-range shots impossible to defend, and a little like
Lionel Messi, scoreless in Barcelona’s famous 5-0 win over Real Madrid in
2010, played a backseat role as a supplier rather than a goalscorer.

但驚人的是，兵工廠也成功的阻止蘇亞雷斯在本場比賽得分。他最好的機會來自一次無法
防守的長射，這與梅西在2010巴薩5-0大勝皇馬的比賽中沒有得分有點像，他扮演了更多
低調的支援腳色，而不是進球者。

Sturridge and Sterling were the main attackers – Sturridge charging towards
goal from an inside-left position, and Sterling always popping up on the
left, at the far post, as if Arsenal given 100% of their attention to the SAS
and forgotten about the third man running. His five shots were taken from
absurdly close-range positions.

司徒里奇跟史特靈是本場利物浦主要的攻擊手─司徒里奇在左側(原文有誤，應該是右側
才對)向球門衝鋒，而史特靈則在左路前推，搶球門遠點─就好像兵工廠把注意力都放在
SAS組合(蘇亞雷斯跟司徒里奇)身上，而忘了還有第三個攻擊手衝進來，他的五次射門位
置都離球門不可思議的近。

Interestingly, Liverpool’s front three were in completely different roles
from the win over Everton, even accounting for the fluidity. Sterling, for
example, was on the opposite flank permanently, while Sturridge led the
attack rather than Suarez. Considering all three were so effective, it’s
difficult to know which zone of the pitch Rodgers was concentrating on when
deciding to make this switch.

有趣的是利物浦在此戰中讓三個攻擊手扮演了與埃弗頓戰完全不同的腳色，連三人的流動
性都有所不同。例如史特靈在本場比賽幾乎固定在左路，並且改由司徒里奇而非蘇亞雷斯
發動攻擊。在這個調整後，由於三人的表現都非常好，很難看出羅傑斯的戰術中，到底針
對場上哪個區域進行攻擊。

Realistically the game was over by half-time, and you get the impression both
managers would have shaken hands there and then – Rodgers to be assured of a
huge victory, Wenger to prevent further embarrassment and to rest his players
ahead of a tough few weeks. The second half was played at half-pace, with the
contest long since decided.

現實來說，這場比賽在中場就結束了。你幾乎可以感到兩位主帥要握手結束這場比賽，羅
傑斯確保了一場大勝，而溫格則可以讓球員休息備戰未來的比賽還有避免進一步的羞辱。
下半場的步調因此慢了下來─畢竟比賽結果早已明朗。



Conclusion
結論


Arsenal were not good – that much is obvious. But whereas in Liverpool’s
5-0 win over Tottenham, they barely needed to play particularly well and Spurs
’ strategy was so baffling it resulted in their manager being sacked the
next morning, this was all about Liverpool. Some of their goals were sublime
in terms of pace and precision on the break, and there were other – often
better – moves that didn’t result in goals, too.

兵工廠打得不好─這非常明顯。但是相較於利物浦5-0大勝熱刺的比賽，他們只需要表現得
稍微好一點，熱刺當時的策略顯得讓人困惑，最後也讓他們的總教練在隔日一早就被開除
。利物浦的幾個進球非常漂亮，特別是在速度與精準度方面─但是在比賽中還有其他的幾
次機會─通常表現得更好─最後卻沒有進球。

There’s been a growing feeling throughout Rodgers’ 20 months in charge that
Liverpool are better the more direct they’re able to play, and this was the
finest example yet. Liverpool did everything quickly, from winning the ball
in midfield to releasing it in behind, and produced a level of performance
not seen at Anfield for some time.

在羅傑斯接掌利物浦兵符的20個月以來，讓人感覺利物浦打得越直接，表現也就越好，這
場比賽就是至今最好的例證。利物浦的節奏很快，連中場搶斷回傳後衛都是高節奏。他們
表現了相當水平的發揮，這在安菲爾德已經許久未見了。

--