Re: ........ - 美國職棒

By Jake
at 2005-12-31T03:20
at 2005-12-31T03:20
Table of Contents
: 推 lovejeely:先簽Everett搞到沒錢簽Millwood真是個Orz的決策
: → lovejeely:雖然說Millwood不值那個價,但比起洗炸彈起碼好一些...
水手簽Everett之前(12/14), 曾傳出offer 44m/4yrs給Millwood(12/5),
雖然水手官方否認以及沒有後續消息,
但這看來不像是Everett的約造成不夠錢簽Millwood.
反而比較像1.水手對5yrs contract卻步. 2.不想把大多錢投在一位大投手身上.
打算不標Millwood之後, 才轉向去投Everett, Washburn...
(去買三個臭皮匠...)
Millwood得到的合約, 48m/4yrs + 12m/1yr(條件式),
和水手"傳聞"的44m/4yrs, 差距並不大.
加碼1m/yr, 並不算多, 或者用投手主場讓Millwood給些offer.
44m/4yrs + 11m/1yr 如何?
相對於水手給Washburn的約, Rangers有保障多了.
---------------------------
結論是Bavasi不應該和Bora$走得太近...
--
: → lovejeely:雖然說Millwood不值那個價,但比起洗炸彈起碼好一些...
水手簽Everett之前(12/14), 曾傳出offer 44m/4yrs給Millwood(12/5),
雖然水手官方否認以及沒有後續消息,
但這看來不像是Everett的約造成不夠錢簽Millwood.
反而比較像1.水手對5yrs contract卻步. 2.不想把大多錢投在一位大投手身上.
打算不標Millwood之後, 才轉向去投Everett, Washburn...
(去買三個臭皮匠...)
Millwood得到的合約, 48m/4yrs + 12m/1yr(條件式),
和水手"傳聞"的44m/4yrs, 差距並不大.
加碼1m/yr, 並不算多, 或者用投手主場讓Millwood給些offer.
44m/4yrs + 11m/1yr 如何?
相對於水手給Washburn的約, Rangers有保障多了.
---------------------------
結論是Bavasi不應該和Bora$走得太近...
--
Tags:
美國職棒
All Comments

By Heather
at 2006-01-03T01:46
at 2006-01-03T01:46

By Kristin
at 2006-01-04T09:38
at 2006-01-04T09:38

By Quanna
at 2006-01-05T00:09
at 2006-01-05T00:09
Related Posts
Re: ........

By Susan
at 2005-12-30T22:51
at 2005-12-30T22:51
Re: ........

By Andy
at 2005-12-30T18:26
at 2005-12-30T18:26
Re: ........

By Adele
at 2005-12-30T09:01
at 2005-12-30T09:01
Re: ........

By Valerie
at 2005-12-30T00:21
at 2005-12-30T00:21
Jose Paniagua...

By Zora
at 2005-12-29T16:33
at 2005-12-29T16:33