NBA官方回應林書豪的影片事件 - NBA
By Connor
at 2016-04-16T13:40
at 2016-04-16T13:40
Table of Contents
以下是不專業分析,有錯請大家海涵
原文中提到平均五百次犯規有一次惡意犯規,
那切入時得到惡意犯規是平均幾百次會有一次?
假設切入時,平均450次犯規有一次惡意犯規,
那八百次次犯規還沒有犯規,要怎樣看統計顯著度?
再假設,平均450次犯規一次惡意犯規,標準差算100好了,
814次犯規已經超過三個標準差
也超越就是常態分布上面的 0.0015的機率(上下加起來0.003)
統計顯著度已經很明顯了吧?
另外要談big data,那還得先把不同裁判,不同膚色的人相對應的犯規次數撈出來比較
只是這樣設及種族問題
他們應該也不敢去撈這樣的數據吧
以上是小弟的不專業分析,
可能有誤,請大家看看就好
※ 引述《thnlkj0665 (灰色地帶)》之銘言:
: 原文網址: FOX SPORTS http://tinyurl.com/hzgp8w9
: By Allyssa Lee Apr 15, 2016 at 10:04p ET
: NBA denies officiating bias against Jeremy Lin
: The NBA responded to a New York Times article about a fan-made video showing
: Charlotte Hornets guard Jeremy Lin getting clotheslined, bumped and slapped
: during games without drawing a flagrant foul.
: NBA官方回應紐約時報撰寫關於粉絲製作林書豪影片的文章,影片中的林書豪在比賽時遭到
: 對手金臂勾、衝撞與打臉,可是卻沒有被判為惡意犯規。
: The six-and-a-half-minute video, titled Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Foul,
: was posted to YouTube on April 5 and includes a letter to NBA commissioner
: Adam Silver suggesting the league and its officials had an anti-Jeremy Lin
: bias. Since the New York Times article on the clip was published on Thursday,
: the video has reached nearly 1.3 million views.
: 這一部約6分半的影片,標題打著 " Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Foul "
: 在4月5日上傳至YouTube,其中包含了給NBA主席Adam Silver的一封信
: 暗示著聯盟和裁判對於林書豪有所偏見
: 而且自從紐約時報在星期四發表關於這部影片的文章之後
: 影片的觀看次數已經快要接近130萬了 (目前已突破133萬次)
: On Friday, the league responded with a statement. "After reviewing our
: extensive officiating database, we have found no data that suggests Jeremy
: Lin is disadvantaged by our officiating staff," the NBA said, citing the
: league's set of criteria on fouls.
: NBA官方在美國時間星期五正式發表聲明來回應
: 聯盟在聲明引用關於犯規的標準提到:「經過重新檢閱了大規模的數據資料庫之後,並未有
: 任何相關數據顯示出林書豪有遭到裁判的不平等待遇。」
: "While some of the plays in the video involved hard contact, none was
: subsequently deemed a Flagrant Foul given the full circumstances, angles and
: comparables from past games."
: "儘管在影片中一些play包含激烈的身體接觸,但是經過賽後完整的檢視,包括參酌整體
: 的情況、各種角度且與過去的賽事進行對比,後來都沒有被認定為惡意犯規。"
: The NBA also used leaguewide foul statistics, saying Lin ranked 21st among
: all players in drives to the basket with 1,537, but is seventh highest in
: drawn fouls among the 23 players with more than 1,500 drives.
: NBA也引用了整個聯盟的犯規統計數據,說林書豪在過去三個球季以來一共切入了1537次,
: 在NBA的所有球員中排名第21位
: 但是在23位超過1500次切入的球員當中,林書豪所吸引的犯規次數排行高居第七名。
: "Furthermore, given the infrequency of flagrant fouls (roughly 1 per every
: 500 foul calls), it is not statistically significant that none of Mr. Lin's
: 814 fouls drawn were deemed flagrant."
: 此外,就以惡意犯規的頻率來說 (大約500個犯規中,有一個惡意犯規)
: 林書豪則是在過去的814次犯規沒有出現過任何一次的惡意犯規
: 根據此一標準來看,並不具有統計上面的意義。
: 附註:
: NBA官方的完整聲明稿
: http://official.nba.com/nba-response-new-york-times-story-jeremy-lin/
: "Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Call" 原始影片連結
: https://youtu.be/KvaM0pMj-8o
: 中文版影片連結
: https://youtu.be/Av69FviuyZw
--
原文中提到平均五百次犯規有一次惡意犯規,
那切入時得到惡意犯規是平均幾百次會有一次?
假設切入時,平均450次犯規有一次惡意犯規,
那八百次次犯規還沒有犯規,要怎樣看統計顯著度?
再假設,平均450次犯規一次惡意犯規,標準差算100好了,
814次犯規已經超過三個標準差
也超越就是常態分布上面的 0.0015的機率(上下加起來0.003)
統計顯著度已經很明顯了吧?
另外要談big data,那還得先把不同裁判,不同膚色的人相對應的犯規次數撈出來比較
只是這樣設及種族問題
他們應該也不敢去撈這樣的數據吧
以上是小弟的不專業分析,
可能有誤,請大家看看就好
※ 引述《thnlkj0665 (灰色地帶)》之銘言:
: 原文網址: FOX SPORTS http://tinyurl.com/hzgp8w9
: By Allyssa Lee Apr 15, 2016 at 10:04p ET
: NBA denies officiating bias against Jeremy Lin
: The NBA responded to a New York Times article about a fan-made video showing
: Charlotte Hornets guard Jeremy Lin getting clotheslined, bumped and slapped
: during games without drawing a flagrant foul.
: NBA官方回應紐約時報撰寫關於粉絲製作林書豪影片的文章,影片中的林書豪在比賽時遭到
: 對手金臂勾、衝撞與打臉,可是卻沒有被判為惡意犯規。
: The six-and-a-half-minute video, titled Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Foul,
: was posted to YouTube on April 5 and includes a letter to NBA commissioner
: Adam Silver suggesting the league and its officials had an anti-Jeremy Lin
: bias. Since the New York Times article on the clip was published on Thursday,
: the video has reached nearly 1.3 million views.
: 這一部約6分半的影片,標題打著 " Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Foul "
: 在4月5日上傳至YouTube,其中包含了給NBA主席Adam Silver的一封信
: 暗示著聯盟和裁判對於林書豪有所偏見
: 而且自從紐約時報在星期四發表關於這部影片的文章之後
: 影片的觀看次數已經快要接近130萬了 (目前已突破133萬次)
: On Friday, the league responded with a statement. "After reviewing our
: extensive officiating database, we have found no data that suggests Jeremy
: Lin is disadvantaged by our officiating staff," the NBA said, citing the
: league's set of criteria on fouls.
: NBA官方在美國時間星期五正式發表聲明來回應
: 聯盟在聲明引用關於犯規的標準提到:「經過重新檢閱了大規模的數據資料庫之後,並未有
: 任何相關數據顯示出林書豪有遭到裁判的不平等待遇。」
: "While some of the plays in the video involved hard contact, none was
: subsequently deemed a Flagrant Foul given the full circumstances, angles and
: comparables from past games."
: "儘管在影片中一些play包含激烈的身體接觸,但是經過賽後完整的檢視,包括參酌整體
: 的情況、各種角度且與過去的賽事進行對比,後來都沒有被認定為惡意犯規。"
: The NBA also used leaguewide foul statistics, saying Lin ranked 21st among
: all players in drives to the basket with 1,537, but is seventh highest in
: drawn fouls among the 23 players with more than 1,500 drives.
: NBA也引用了整個聯盟的犯規統計數據,說林書豪在過去三個球季以來一共切入了1537次,
: 在NBA的所有球員中排名第21位
: 但是在23位超過1500次切入的球員當中,林書豪所吸引的犯規次數排行高居第七名。
: "Furthermore, given the infrequency of flagrant fouls (roughly 1 per every
: 500 foul calls), it is not statistically significant that none of Mr. Lin's
: 814 fouls drawn were deemed flagrant."
: 此外,就以惡意犯規的頻率來說 (大約500個犯規中,有一個惡意犯規)
: 林書豪則是在過去的814次犯規沒有出現過任何一次的惡意犯規
: 根據此一標準來看,並不具有統計上面的意義。
: 附註:
: NBA官方的完整聲明稿
: http://official.nba.com/nba-response-new-york-times-story-jeremy-lin/
: "Jeremy Lin: Too Flagrant Not to Call" 原始影片連結
: https://youtu.be/KvaM0pMj-8o
: https://youtu.be/Av69FviuyZw
--
Tags:
NBA
All Comments
By Olive
at 2016-04-18T19:52
at 2016-04-18T19:52
By Dinah
at 2016-04-22T10:59
at 2016-04-22T10:59
By William
at 2016-04-26T14:56
at 2016-04-26T14:56
By John
at 2016-05-01T13:14
at 2016-05-01T13:14
By Edith
at 2016-05-05T00:09
at 2016-05-05T00:09
By Mason
at 2016-05-09T12:52
at 2016-05-09T12:52
By Susan
at 2016-05-12T13:30
at 2016-05-12T13:30
By Barb Cronin
at 2016-05-17T02:49
at 2016-05-17T02:49
By Quanna
at 2016-05-17T21:53
at 2016-05-17T21:53
By Damian
at 2016-05-21T01:02
at 2016-05-21T01:02
By Yedda
at 2016-05-22T03:29
at 2016-05-22T03:29
By Kristin
at 2016-05-24T20:56
at 2016-05-24T20:56
By William
at 2016-05-29T10:25
at 2016-05-29T10:25
By William
at 2016-05-29T15:18
at 2016-05-29T15:18
By Olive
at 2016-06-03T12:42
at 2016-06-03T12:42
By Carol
at 2016-06-03T21:25
at 2016-06-03T21:25
By Catherine
at 2016-06-05T21:45
at 2016-06-05T21:45
By Cara
at 2016-06-06T19:03
at 2016-06-06T19:03
By Heather
at 2016-06-10T21:22
at 2016-06-10T21:22
By Jacob
at 2016-06-13T03:37
at 2016-06-13T03:37
By Zanna
at 2016-06-15T10:47
at 2016-06-15T10:47
By Victoria
at 2016-06-19T09:58
at 2016-06-19T09:58
By Ina
at 2016-06-23T04:58
at 2016-06-23T04:58
By Linda
at 2016-06-23T19:37
at 2016-06-23T19:37
By Selena
at 2016-06-25T20:22
at 2016-06-25T20:22
By Caitlin
at 2016-06-30T10:51
at 2016-06-30T10:51
By Edith
at 2016-07-03T21:25
at 2016-07-03T21:25
By Yuri
at 2016-07-06T13:49
at 2016-07-06T13:49
By Agnes
at 2016-07-07T15:38
at 2016-07-07T15:38
By Lily
at 2016-07-09T11:52
at 2016-07-09T11:52
Related Posts
NBA官方回應林書豪的影片事件
By Heather
at 2016-04-16T13:39
at 2016-04-16T13:39
NBA通過球衣將允許貼上「狗皮膏藥」廣告
By Lily
at 2016-04-16T13:37
at 2016-04-16T13:37
引退賽中裁判對kobe 說的話
By Daph Bay
at 2016-04-16T13:16
at 2016-04-16T13:16
為何Jordan要巫師復出?
By Caroline
at 2016-04-16T13:16
at 2016-04-16T13:16
NBA官方回應林書豪的影片事件
By Ethan
at 2016-04-16T12:52
at 2016-04-16T12:52