Nadal對小火車... - 網球 Tennis

Table of Contents

當事人說法 XD

http://www.tennis.com/articles/templates/news.aspx?articleid=9072&zoneid=25

With Nadal trailing 6-5, Berdych’s backhand was called out by Brazilian
umpire Carlos Bernardes, but Nadal had returned the ball in play. Berdych
challenged the call, which confirmed the ball was actually in. The Czech
player was then awarded the point.

6-5的時候,Berdych的反拍被巴西主審判決出界,但Nadal已經回球,Berdych挑戰
判決,結果是in,捷克選手獲得該分。

Nadal was convinced the point should have been replayed, and ranted first at
Bernardes and then at the tournament supervisor sitting in the front row of
the crowd, to no avail.

Nadal認為應該要重打,而且向主審Bernardes抗議之後,再向坐在場邊第一排的賽事
監督抗議。

“There is no argument,” Nadal said. “I am right, but it’s (a) mistake for
him. But he is a great umpire and everybody (makes) a mistake.”

Nadal說法:沒有爭議,我是對的,這是他的錯誤,但他是個好主審,人人都會犯錯。

Berdych said he thought Nadal had stopped playing to indicate the ball was
out, and that the umpire was correct to give him the point.

Berdych說他認為Nadal已經停止擊球並指出該球出界,主審給他那分是對的。

“The referee is probably scared of him and just let him to talk with him too
long,” Berdych said. “He was able to play. But every time when you just
raise your hand, that means that you stop the play.”

Berdych說法:裁判大概怕了他,讓他跟他說這麼久,他可以打。但每次當你舉起手來,
就代表你停止那球的進行。


--

All Comments

Margaret avatarMargaret2010-11-29
跟我看到的情形一樣...這分是應該要重打~~畢竟Nadal也有打進 而不是認為Out而不打
Olive avatarOlive2010-12-02
我是覺得雙方都有盲點~
Mason avatarMason2010-12-05
Berdych 不意外
Andy avatarAndy2010-12-07
我覺得對手一號應該是Soderling XD
Audriana avatarAudriana2010-12-10
啊 回錯篇了 sorry
George avatarGeorge2010-12-13
推There is no argument~
Selena avatarSelena2010-12-15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VywZYrxm1t8影片很明顯納豆舉手疑惑的同時主審自己就改判了
Audriana avatarAudriana2010-12-18
而且小火車也可以不用這樣說吧,"主審怕了他"
Oliver avatarOliver2010-12-20
sleeeve... aceral1916... XD
Isabella avatarIsabella2010-12-23
Berdych是覺得裁判讓Nadal爭論太久了,應該適時制止
Audriana avatarAudriana2010-12-26
Nadal打完球沒看主審就轉頭了,所以他是認為Out而不打啊
Sandy avatarSandy2010-12-28
我發現主審手有縮一下,看到Nadal舉手才說Out,這哪招XD
Zenobia avatarZenobia2010-12-31
先中斷比賽進行的是Nadal,而不是主審的判決
Delia avatarDelia2011-01-02
Berych說那句大概有點開玩笑吧XD
Enid avatarEnid2011-01-05
但他後面還有說他認為主審不該讓納豆覺得在場上想做什麼就做什麼,都已經得了便宜還這樣orz
Elvira avatarElvira2011-01-08
沒有想做什麼就做什麼 爭取應該得到的是應該的
Daniel avatarDaniel2011-01-10
得了便宜?這個判決給了Rafa什麼便宜?
Mia avatarMia2011-01-13
Nadal不會用這種小技巧取勝 畢竟他實力高上一大截
Quanna avatarQuanna2011-01-15
"得了便宜" 應該是t版友說Berdych得了便宜還這樣說~
Faithe avatarFaithe2011-01-18
Nadal中間好像有說,那他不想打了(用西班牙文)
Ina avatarIna2011-01-21
不是Rafa,是說ber
Victoria avatarVictoria2011-01-23
本來覺得以小火車的立場認為是對方停下(雖然是主審)改判)仍可理解,但他不斷針對納豆去理論的時間頗有微詞感覺很不好啦
Dora avatarDora2011-01-26
主審本來就應該控制Nadal爭論的時間~
Daph Bay avatarDaph Bay2011-01-28
主審:沒辦法 那天給NOLE一點時間去換眼鏡 還一點回去XD
Ina avatarIna2011-01-31
sorry t大,偶看錯你的意思了
Odelette avatarOdelette2011-02-03
雖然我喜歡Rafa 但我也覺得主審不該讓他爭論這麼久
Genevieve avatarGenevieve2011-02-05
no mind:) 外電敘述都是強調主屬的判決+納豆有打回去
Daph Bay avatarDaph Bay2011-02-08
控制時間當然是應該,但用什麼話來形容差很多拉我覺得
Valerie avatarValerie2011-02-11
也許其實Berdych不滿的是裁判,不是Rafa?這件事感覺裁判處理的有點問題
Heather avatarHeather2011-02-13
Nadal爭論的時候,Berdych覺得很無聊吧,都講西班牙文他也聽不懂~
Daph Bay avatarDaph Bay2011-02-16
Carlos Bernades 應該跟Nadal滿熟的 他第一場比賽就是
Harry avatarHarry2011-02-18
Nadal15遂在西班牙的挑戰賽:P
Lydia avatarLydia2011-02-21
完全是主審的問題 納豆都要挑戰了 他幹嘛脫褲子放屁改判