球員交易保護期 (舊文重貼) - NBA

By Oliver
at 2015-07-09T11:27
at 2015-07-09T11:27
Table of Contents
原本是對 Larry Coon 的訪談,但原文的連結已遺失,一時找不到。
==
When a team "agrees" to a contract with a player during the moratorium,
that doesn't mean they have to sign him right away on July 11th, right?
當球團在「球員交易保護期」(moratorium,譯註:今年的七月一日至十一日)
「同意」與球員簽下合約時,不代表球團必須立刻在七月十一日簽下該球員,對嗎?
Larry Coon
Right. In fact, technically they can't even have a VERBAL agreement
during the moratorium. The CBA says, “…no player and team may enter into
any oral or written agreement concerning the terms and conditions of the
player's employment, or reduce any such agreement to writing in the form of
a uniform player contract or amendment, during the moratorium period.”
沒錯。
其實,技術上來說,球團與球員在「球員交易保護期」中,根本不能有「口頭」
協定。CBA 規定:「球員與球團,均不得在球員交易保護期中,達成與合約相關
的任何口頭或書面協定、將該協定寫為制式合約、或合約的附款」。
Now granted, teams and players ignore this rule, which they can skirt by
saying "we have an "understanding", but not an "agreement." But it all
just reinforces the fact that there’s nothing binding about any agreements
made with free agents during the moratorium, and nothing that says they have
to do anything specifically on the 11th.
沒錯,球隊與球員可以無視這條 CBA規範,聲稱「我們對合約內容有『相互的理
解』,並沒有達成任何『合意』」,但這不改變「在球員交易保護期中,任何協
議都沒有拘束力」的事實;(即使有所謂的「合意」,)雙方在七月十一日也沒
有做任何事(譯註:簽約)的義務。
--
==
When a team "agrees" to a contract with a player during the moratorium,
that doesn't mean they have to sign him right away on July 11th, right?
當球團在「球員交易保護期」(moratorium,譯註:今年的七月一日至十一日)
「同意」與球員簽下合約時,不代表球團必須立刻在七月十一日簽下該球員,對嗎?
Larry Coon
Right. In fact, technically they can't even have a VERBAL agreement
during the moratorium. The CBA says, “…no player and team may enter into
any oral or written agreement concerning the terms and conditions of the
player's employment, or reduce any such agreement to writing in the form of
a uniform player contract or amendment, during the moratorium period.”
沒錯。
其實,技術上來說,球團與球員在「球員交易保護期」中,根本不能有「口頭」
協定。CBA 規定:「球員與球團,均不得在球員交易保護期中,達成與合約相關
的任何口頭或書面協定、將該協定寫為制式合約、或合約的附款」。
Now granted, teams and players ignore this rule, which they can skirt by
saying "we have an "understanding", but not an "agreement." But it all
just reinforces the fact that there’s nothing binding about any agreements
made with free agents during the moratorium, and nothing that says they have
to do anything specifically on the 11th.
沒錯,球隊與球員可以無視這條 CBA規範,聲稱「我們對合約內容有『相互的理
解』,並沒有達成任何『合意』」,但這不改變「在球員交易保護期中,任何協
議都沒有拘束力」的事實;(即使有所謂的「合意」,)雙方在七月十一日也沒
有做任何事(譯註:簽約)的義務。
--
Tags:
NBA
All Comments

By Zanna
at 2015-07-09T12:38
at 2015-07-09T12:38

By Dorothy
at 2015-07-13T02:27
at 2015-07-13T02:27

By Candice
at 2015-07-16T03:37
at 2015-07-16T03:37

By Enid
at 2015-07-19T20:32
at 2015-07-19T20:32

By Andrew
at 2015-07-23T05:21
at 2015-07-23T05:21

By Damian
at 2015-07-27T21:34
at 2015-07-27T21:34

By Kristin
at 2015-07-29T18:20
at 2015-07-29T18:20

By Ivy
at 2015-08-01T21:11
at 2015-08-01T21:11

By Charlotte
at 2015-08-03T18:26
at 2015-08-03T18:26
這種招式要廢掉其他隊伍很容易 想想馬刺清出空間後

By Doris
at 2015-08-03T19:49
at 2015-08-03T19:49
可以違反 法律上"口頭承諾"具有效力 這個事實嗎?
這我就不知道了

By Kama
at 2015-08-05T07:15
at 2015-08-05T07:15
本來就是一個很人性的條款

By Gary
at 2015-08-09T10:48
at 2015-08-09T10:48

By Bennie
at 2015-08-13T04:55
at 2015-08-13T04:55
就法理來說DAJ/快艇沒錯 但實務上他們名聲就是臭了

By Susan
at 2015-08-15T03:38
at 2015-08-15T03:38

By Damian
at 2015-08-17T23:42
at 2015-08-17T23:42

By Edward Lewis
at 2015-08-19T06:20
at 2015-08-19T06:20

By Liam
at 2015-08-22T08:49
at 2015-08-22T08:49

By Edward Lewis
at 2015-08-26T20:21
at 2015-08-26T20:21

By Jake
at 2015-08-30T23:35
at 2015-08-30T23:35

By Rachel
at 2015-09-04T06:48
at 2015-09-04T06:48
記得林來瘋時期嗎 火箭合約送去紐約沒人收

By Emma
at 2015-09-06T12:02
at 2015-09-06T12:02

By Ina
at 2015-09-10T23:32
at 2015-09-10T23:32
有一些其他的處罰 但法律上 小牛是否能告呢

By Hedda
at 2015-09-14T07:36
at 2015-09-14T07:36

By Christine
at 2015-09-18T03:48
at 2015-09-18T03:48

By Kelly
at 2015-09-19T17:21
at 2015-09-19T17:21

By Oliver
at 2015-09-20T06:33
at 2015-09-20T06:33
況且這也不是第一次有人這麼幹

By David
at 2015-09-21T20:31
at 2015-09-21T20:31

By Edwina
at 2015-09-23T15:52
at 2015-09-23T15:52
法律上能告

By Catherine
at 2015-09-26T20:20
at 2015-09-26T20:20
但法律上 還是判這個口頭承諾是有效的?

By Mason
at 2015-09-29T08:48
at 2015-09-29T08:48

By Regina
at 2015-10-01T07:24
at 2015-10-01T07:24

By Annie
at 2015-10-01T22:56
at 2015-10-01T22:56
承諾就是承諾阿,依照形式會有效力差別

By Ula
at 2015-10-03T11:16
at 2015-10-03T11:16

By Anonymous
at 2015-10-06T23:12
at 2015-10-06T23:12

By Valerie
at 2015-10-08T09:38
at 2015-10-08T09:38

By Kyle
at 2015-10-11T10:08
at 2015-10-11T10:08

By Todd Johnson
at 2015-10-14T07:01
at 2015-10-14T07:01

By Lucy
at 2015-10-17T16:17
at 2015-10-17T16:17

By Frederic
at 2015-10-20T22:51
at 2015-10-20T22:51

By Poppy
at 2015-10-23T06:12
at 2015-10-23T06:12

By Yuri
at 2015-10-24T18:20
at 2015-10-24T18:20

By James
at 2015-10-28T20:35
at 2015-10-28T20:35
等你官司告成把DAJ簽回來例行賽說不定都打完了...

By Liam
at 2015-10-30T02:39
at 2015-10-30T02:39

By Jessica
at 2015-10-31T19:01
at 2015-10-31T19:01

By Quanna
at 2015-11-04T00:25
at 2015-11-04T00:25

By Emma
at 2015-11-08T11:58
at 2015-11-08T11:58

By Isabella
at 2015-11-13T01:26
at 2015-11-13T01:26

By Caroline
at 2015-11-16T13:37
at 2015-11-16T13:37

By Sandy
at 2015-11-16T15:53
at 2015-11-16T15:53

By Charlie
at 2015-11-18T06:17
at 2015-11-18T06:17

By Ula
at 2015-11-19T23:13
at 2015-11-19T23:13

By Jake
at 2015-11-24T17:03
at 2015-11-24T17:03

By Andy
at 2015-11-26T15:40
at 2015-11-26T15:40
簽不回來的

By Freda
at 2015-11-29T10:45
at 2015-11-29T10:45

By Noah
at 2015-12-02T04:46
at 2015-12-02T04:46

By David
at 2015-12-06T10:39
at 2015-12-06T10:39

By Iris
at 2015-12-09T13:19
at 2015-12-09T13:19

By Noah
at 2015-12-10T19:56
at 2015-12-10T19:56

By Emily
at 2015-12-12T15:13
at 2015-12-12T15:13

By David
at 2015-12-14T23:06
at 2015-12-14T23:06
具有要式性 跟不動產所有權移轉一樣的感覺

By Oscar
at 2015-12-18T17:28
at 2015-12-18T17:28

By Carol
at 2015-12-23T07:05
at 2015-12-23T07:05

By Hedwig
at 2015-12-26T05:54
at 2015-12-26T05:54

By Delia
at 2015-12-28T14:32
at 2015-12-28T14:32
除非小牛要不排除解散

By John
at 2015-12-29T22:52
at 2015-12-29T22:52
面試口頭同意給OFFER 如果毀棄當然可以告

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2016-01-01T15:21
at 2016-01-01T15:21

By Skylar Davis
at 2016-01-05T19:29
at 2016-01-05T19:29

By Megan
at 2016-01-06T18:17
at 2016-01-06T18:17

By Dora
at 2016-01-08T19:07
at 2016-01-08T19:07

By Queena
at 2016-01-13T13:37
at 2016-01-13T13:37

By Adele
at 2016-01-14T16:27
at 2016-01-14T16:27

By Dora
at 2016-01-16T12:56
at 2016-01-16T12:56
頂多就是毀約 賠錢

By Agatha
at 2016-01-18T15:51
at 2016-01-18T15:51

By Margaret
at 2016-01-22T09:25
at 2016-01-22T09:25

By Enid
at 2016-01-22T19:11
at 2016-01-22T19:11

By Hardy
at 2016-01-25T05:29
at 2016-01-25T05:29

By Hedwig
at 2016-01-25T11:21
at 2016-01-25T11:21

By Irma
at 2016-01-27T22:56
at 2016-01-27T22:56

By Hedwig
at 2016-01-31T07:39
at 2016-01-31T07:39

By Kelly
at 2016-02-02T10:07
at 2016-02-02T10:07

By Kelly
at 2016-02-05T00:06
at 2016-02-05T00:06

By Agatha
at 2016-02-05T17:43
at 2016-02-05T17:43

By Hedwig
at 2016-02-10T03:08
at 2016-02-10T03:08

By Olga
at 2016-02-11T14:14
at 2016-02-11T14:14

By Steve
at 2016-02-15T23:45
at 2016-02-15T23:45

By Emily
at 2016-02-16T18:00
at 2016-02-16T18:00

By Brianna
at 2016-02-21T05:34
at 2016-02-21T05:34
也就是這段期間內 只能協商 只能討論
但不能有任何承諾 那這樣很多人都遊走灰色地帶
很多媒體都會證實 誰誰誰答應去XX隊 媒體說了

By Quintina
at 2016-02-24T09:34
at 2016-02-24T09:34
但很多事當事人公開講 或者推特上推 說我要去XXX了
這樣不就等於告訴大家 我答應了 我承諾了?
但也沒看過NBA拿本文這條規則出來處罰阿

By Agnes
at 2016-02-24T16:31
at 2016-02-24T16:31
Related Posts
曝小喬丹答應轉小牛內幕:都是因為聽媽

By Jack
at 2015-07-09T11:27
at 2015-07-09T11:27
很好奇快艇到底跟DAJ談了什麼

By Joseph
at 2015-07-09T11:25
at 2015-07-09T11:25
DA人生結束(暫時?)

By Edwina
at 2015-07-09T11:18
at 2015-07-09T11:18
lin轉隊當天都會有大事發生

By Oscar
at 2015-07-09T11:18
at 2015-07-09T11:18
Cuban刪除支持駭客戰術的相關推特

By Hardy
at 2015-07-09T11:14
at 2015-07-09T11:14