根據FIFA規則
Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with
the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into
consideration:
‧ the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)
‧ the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)
‧ the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an
infringement
‧ touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard,
etc.)
counts as an infringement
‧ hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an
infringement
扣除掉後面兩點,還有現在也不太管的距離。
其實關鍵應該就是有沒有 故意 跟 手是不是處於自然位置。
這球我個人看是覺得 手絕對沒有故意碰,那接下來就是看是不是有協助防守(擴大面積),
但這球頂完以後就是送給奈及利亞超棒射門機會,所以裁判認為這個並沒有協助防守吧 !
足球一直都是個講求得利與否的主觀判決規則,
像是就算在越位位置,但裁判認為沒影響射門或助攻,不會主動說邊邊那個人越位囉sry
而且奈及利亞當下也直接射門再來討拍,我覺得這是主審不改判的原因。
不知道各位ptt裁判覺得如何 ? A_A
--
Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with
the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into
consideration:
‧ the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)
‧ the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)
‧ the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an
infringement
‧ touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard,
etc.)
counts as an infringement
‧ hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an
infringement
扣除掉後面兩點,還有現在也不太管的距離。
其實關鍵應該就是有沒有 故意 跟 手是不是處於自然位置。
這球我個人看是覺得 手絕對沒有故意碰,那接下來就是看是不是有協助防守(擴大面積),
但這球頂完以後就是送給奈及利亞超棒射門機會,所以裁判認為這個並沒有協助防守吧 !
足球一直都是個講求得利與否的主觀判決規則,
像是就算在越位位置,但裁判認為沒影響射門或助攻,不會主動說邊邊那個人越位囉sry
而且奈及利亞當下也直接射門再來討拍,我覺得這是主審不改判的原因。
不知道各位ptt裁判覺得如何 ? A_A
--
All Comments