季後賽要改制了 - NBA

由於近年來西強東弱實在是太明顯
西區第八都可能在東區是第四
這些原因難免使大家覺得
賽制實在是太不公平了

東區第一對東區第八
跟本虐菜爽爽過

只要在東區好像輕鬆打
只要等到總決賽時
在來打西區就好

反觀西區場場肉搏
就像打架一樣
前三場我都打贏拳王了
最後一場元氣大傷
被混混補刀一樣
實在是有夠ooxx

改成分區前四制
又害到總戰績好的球隊
看看馬刺跟快艇多囧

然而要改制
東區的老闆們一定會抗議到底
誰不想爽爽刷戰績
多賣個季後賽門票

所以就跟你說travel issue的關係
我們還是一樣東西分區吧
響應環保，省省油錢，世界多美好
看的鍵盤球迷們是恨的心癢癢

我到是有個好建議
既然大家吵不清
不然先來試試一個新賽制
一樣的東西區取八強
只是東西區冠軍
明年互換區域
就是今年的勇士明年就算東區
騎士明年就分到西區
既然敢說自己是東西區冠軍
應該就要敢接受挑戰嗎

如此一來只有兩隊需要
長途旅行
又能減少各隊油錢花費問題
更能消弭
某隊在某區當山大王之疑慮

大家互相交流一下
就知道有幾兩重了阿～



※ 引述《ClutchShot (ClutchShot)》之銘言：
: 這次改制的確沒有改到分區問題 但要提改革 不得不提top16
: 取前16強這件事絕對不是只有鄉民網路上說說而已!!!
: 隨便google一下都有...
: 現行賽制上的不完美是值得大家認真討論的
: 身為一個球迷 當然會想看到最強的隊伍出線 不是嗎?
: Adam Silver:NBA needs to look at taking top 16 teams for the playoffs
: 主席:NBA考慮取前16強進季後賽
: “Ultimately we want to see your best teams in the playoffs. And there is an
: unbalance and a certain unfairness. There is a proposal (from one of the
: broadcasters)… where the division winners would all automatically go into
: the playoffs and then you’d seed the next 10 best teams. I think that’s the
: kind of proposal we need to look at. There are travel issues of course, but
: in this day in age every team of course has their own plane, travels charter.
: I don’t think the discussion should end there. And as I’ve said, my first
: year I was studying a lot of these issues and year 2 is time to take action.
: It’s something I’m going to look at closely with the competition committee.
: I do think it’s an area where we need to make a change.”
: Silver:現行制度的確有不平衡及不公平的問題，
: 現在有一個提案是:各分組第一加上之後的前十強(這樣剛好16隻隊伍)進季後賽，
: 我知道會有travel issues，但是現在大家都有私人飛機，
: 我上任第一年會好好研究這些議題，第二年就會做出行動，
: 我認為這這議題的確是我們有必要改變之處。
: BPI: Analyzing a potential top-16 playoff system
: 前16強季後賽制度分析
: (ESPN今年4/3的文章，排名不太一樣，加減看)
: These changes have big implications for who is likely to make the Finals.
: Under the current conference system, four teams have a 20 percent or better
: chance of making the NBA Finals -- the Warriors, Spurs, Hawks and Cavaliers.
: Meanwhile, based on 10,000 simulations of the top-16 system, the Warriors'
: odds of making the finals go from 50 percent to 57 percent, and only the
: Spurs (36 percent) and Clippers (26 percent) have more than a 20 percent
: chance of getting to the Finals. The path for the top teams in the West would
: become easier, and the path for the top of the East would become much harder.
: The Hawks, for example, would probably be the biggest losers in a switch to a
: top-16 system. They would see their odds of making the Finals drop from 20
: percent in the conference system to 10 percent, and their odds of getting out
: of the first round would drop from 80 percent to 69 percent.
: The top-16 system does more than boost the West and burden the East, though.
: It also would make it much more likely that the final two rounds of the
: playoffs -- the semifinals (currently the conference championship round) and
: the NBA Finals -- would be played by the best teams in the league. Under the
: conference system, there is a 66 percent chance that a team outside the top
: 10 in BPI will be competing in the Eastern Conference finals and a 30 percent
: chance that a team outside the top 10 will be in the NBA Finals.
: 現行規則:有四隻球隊有20%以上的機率打進finals 勇士 馬刺 老鷹 騎士
: 若改制取前16強:只剩三隻球隊有20%以上機率
: 而勇士機率從50->57% 馬刺36% 快艇26%
: 改制後西區攻頂的難度下降，東區則上升，老鷹可能會是影響最大的球隊，
: 打進finals的機會從20%掉到10%，進第二輪的機會從80%掉到69%
: 改制後最後兩輪(semifinals 原本的分區冠軍戰)將更有機會由真正最好的球隊較量，
: 現行制度有66%機率有球隊在BPI前10以外打進東冠，
: 有30%機率有球隊在BPI前10以外打進總冠。

--