Matt Cain, unluckiest pitcher in history? - 美國職棒

http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/15094/matt-cain-unluckiest-pitcher-in-history


So mjames89 asked on Twitter: Matt Cain, best pitcher in history with an
under-.500 record?

Good question. Cain won Wednesday night to push his career W-L record to
67-71, despite a 3.37 ERA and an ERA+ (ERA adjusted for home ballpark and
league era) of 126. To compare, here are a few other pitchers with a similar
ERA+ and their career W-L record:

Tim Hudson 127 (177-94)

Kevin Brown 127 (211-144)

Lefty Gomez 126 (189-102)

Cole Hamels 126 (73-52)

Jim Palmer 126 (268-152)

Bret Saberhagen 126 (167-117)

CC Sabathia 125 (173-95)

John Smoltz 125 (213-155)

John Tudor 125 (117-92)


OK, I cheated a little bit, picking out guys with exceptional winning
percentages. But it does point to the caliber of pitchers comparable to Cain
(obviously, besides Hamels, the others performed at that level for a much
longer time).

Among pitchers with at least 1,000 innings, I went to Baseball-Reference.com
and found 10 with an ERA+ of 120 or better and a losing record. Seven of them
were relief pitchers: Trevor Hoffman, Bruce Sutter, Lee Smith, Roberto
Hernandez, Doug Jones, Mike Jackson and Jeff Reardon.

The three starters were Cain, Johnny Rigney (122 ERA+, 63-64 W-L record) and
Jim Scott (121 ERA+, 107-114). Rigney pitched for the White Sox in the late
'30s and early '40s while Scott also pitched for the White Sox, from 1909 to
1917.

Scott was born in Deadwood, S.D., and apparently earned the nickname "Death
Valley Scott," apparently also the moniker of a famous con man of the time.
Scott later worked in the movie industry in Hollywood, umpired for two
seasons in the National League and even joined a religious cult for a short
period. You can read his bio here.

A reader on Twitter also mentioned Ben Sheets, who is 90-92 in his career
with a 3.79 ERA. That translates to a 113 ERA+, so I'd argue Cain has been a
little better over their careers. Sheets did have a particularly tough-luck
season in 2004, when he posted a 2.70 ERA with a 264/32 SO/BB ratio in 237
innings for the Brewers. He may have been the best pitcher in the NL that
year but finished 12-14.

As for Cain, does this make him the unluckiest pitcher in big league history?
I don't know about that, but it seems like he has a decent argument.

--