Fan interferes with Betts on potential - 美國職棒

Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2018-10-18T11:51

Table of Contents

1. 新聞來源:

MLB

2. 新聞標題:

Fan interferes with Betts on potential Altuve HR

3. 新聞內容:

By Alyson Footer MLB.com

HOUSTON -- It took less than 30 minutes into Game 4 of the American League
Championship Series on Wednesday night at Minute Maid Park for the first
controversy to rain down on the Astros and Red Sox.

The Astros trailed, 2-0, in the first inning when Jose Altuve sent a long fly
ball off Rick Porcello that looked to have reached the seats in right field
for a game-tying homer. The ball appeared to hit Mookie Betts' outstretched
glove in home run territory before it caromed back onto the field. Crew chief
Joe West, manning the right-field line, called interference on the play as a
fan's hands made contact with Betts' glove, causing it to close and
preventing him from completing the catch.

View Full Game Coverage

A crew-chief review could not definitely determine if the fan had reached
into the field of play or not and the call would stand.

Altuve was called out and George Springer, who had singled to right-center,
was sent back to first base.

According to the broadcast on TBS, Major League Baseball informed the network
that West had immediately called Altuve out on the play.

The official ruling states:

(e) (3.16) Spectator Interference: When there is spectator interference with
any thrown or batted ball, the ball shall be dead at the moment of
interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in his opinion
will nullify the act of interference.

球迷干擾:當被擊出或是傳出的球被球迷影響的當下即是死球,裁判應予以處置以防止
干擾行為發生。

APPROVED RULING: If spectator interference clearly prevents a fielder from
catching a fly ball, the umpire shall declare the batter out.

如果球迷很明顯的妨礙野手接殺飛球,裁判應宣判打者出局。

Further, Rule 6.01(e) states: No interference shall be allowed when a fielder
reaches over a fence, railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does
so at his own risk. However, should a spectator reach out on the playing
field side of such fence, railing or rope, and plainly prevent the fielder
from catching the ball, then the batsman should be called out for the
spectator's interference.

當球員有越過全壘打牆、圍籬、欄杆試圖要接殺出局時,後果須自負。然而,當球迷在球
場範圍內,很明顯影響到野手接殺時,打者即因球迷干擾被判出局。

Astros manager AJ Hinch was asked during an in-game interview about the call.

"Well, [West] just said it was fan interference on the field, and my argument
was more about the fact that the ball was leaving the yard, the trajectory
was there," Hinch said. "Jose paid kind of the ultimate price for something
that's out of his control. I don't know if Mookie makes that catch -- he's a
great athlete, but how it's assumed an out is unbelievable."

MLB
@MLB
#Postseason craziness in Houston
https://twitter.com/MLB/status/1052732592892628992

If the ruling had been home run, the win expectancy for the Astros for this
game would have been 52.6 percent. With the out call the win expectancy for
Houston dropped to 31.7 percent.

4. 新聞網址:

www.mlb.com/news/fan-interference-negates-jose-altuve-home-run/c-298072830

5. 備註:

(1) 情境描述:ALCS4一局下半太空人0比2落後紅襪,Jose Altuve在1好2壞的球數下把
Rick Porcello的球扛到右外野,Mookie Betts奮起一跳手越過全壘打牆試圖接殺這球,
這球被球迷碰到並反彈回場內,當下擔任右外野線審的裁判長Joe West,認為球迷碰到
Betts的手套,導致沒辦法完成這個出局,判決球迷放礙守備全壘打被沒收,後來經過紐約
總部的review仍維持原判。

(2) 太空人總教練 AJ Hinch:「Joe West判決那球是球迷干擾,但我的看法是球早就越
過全壘打牆外了,Jose Altuve打得這麼好但有些結果不是他能掌握的,我不確定
Mookie Betts能不能接到那球,他是位很好的運動員,但預設那球出局讓人難以置信。」

(3) 補充Kate Upton的Twitter:

So if a player is IN the stands fans are suppose to move over? If those are
the rules MLB shouldn’t let fans sit there. They didn’t reach over the
fence. @MLB

所以如果球員在觀眾席球迷也要讓開?如果規定如此,大聯盟不應讓球迷坐在那裡,
他們沒有越過全壘打牆接球。

Watch this video! Mookie’s glove is closed. That’s a home run. #bullshitcall
https://twitter.com/SportsCenter/status/1052728882804215808
--

All Comments

Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2018-10-20T00:01
hehe好爽
Ida avatar
By Ida
at 2018-10-22T10:26
推整理
Necoo avatar
By Necoo
at 2018-10-26T11:55
那球就是出牆了所以以上干擾的規則都不適用,不是嗎
David avatar
By David
at 2018-10-28T14:52
Playing field不包含場外吧
Delia avatar
By Delia
at 2018-10-31T00:58
我個人是支持hinch論點 都越過了還要怎樣
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2018-11-01T11:38
推推 還我阿土HR RRRRR!
Puput avatar
By Puput
at 2018-11-04T11:33
#bullshitcall
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2018-11-08T15:38
而且West一開始手就比出HR,後面又改掉是中風嗎
Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2018-11-09T20:37
除了現場裁判外,輔助判決沒改判,兩邊都出問題?
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2018-11-12T12:34
我個人是覺得球可能剛好在全壘打牆上 因為球迷其實
都站離牆很近 然後觀眾打到Betts手套 他手套夾起來
後球再擦到手套上 如果有明顯球在場外的view應該就
會推翻了 可惜被保全擋住了
Irma avatar
By Irma
at 2018-11-16T17:14
Hinch+1
Daph Bay avatar
By Daph Bay
at 2018-11-19T01:19
現在就是West以為球在場內 鏡頭又被擋住沒法改判
Linda avatar
By Linda
at 2018-11-22T00:08
我看影片是覺得球落下,有先打到手套小指,再打到球迷的手
Bethany avatar
By Bethany
at 2018-11-23T08:26
他如果以為球在場內,那一開始比HR的手勢??
Eartha avatar
By Eartha
at 2018-11-23T16:05
,所以最多應該是2B,而不是HR
Cara avatar
By Cara
at 2018-11-27T19:18
前面某局訪談Hinch有說 West跟他講那球在場內
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2018-12-01T22:14
只是West似乎是直接認定為妨礙外野手接球,但這條規則應該
不能用在這邊
Donna avatar
By Donna
at 2018-12-03T16:49
我想是因為沒有明顯的球在場外的鏡頭,所以只好維持West自
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2018-12-03T19:29
己覺得球在場內的判決
Zora avatar
By Zora
at 2018-12-04T13:00
West在正面看以為在牆上空吧 看完規則覺得是誤判 他眼
幹也不是第一天的事了...
Hamiltion avatar
By Hamiltion
at 2018-12-07T10:23
Joe west爛就算了 電視輔助還不改
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2018-12-10T09:17
以後全壘打牆跟界外區觀眾席都要隔一公尺遠
Odelette avatar
By Odelette
at 2018-12-14T03:12
Hinch和Upton講的有道理 不然聯盟就不要讓球迷坐那邊阿
Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2018-12-17T17:22
就不要最後差這支HR
Edith avatar
By Edith
at 2018-12-21T16:50
最尷尬的不就在於最能提供可能改判證據的鏡頭被擋住嗎
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2018-12-22T16:25
而且還是太空人主場自家保全擋住的
Audriana avatar
By Audriana
at 2018-12-23T05:52
沒畫面可以推翻判決 本來就會維持裁判第一時間認定
Regina avatar
By Regina
at 2018-12-27T03:42
謝謝MLB紐約總部送太空人一敗 票房考慮 大家請理解
Liam avatar
By Liam
at 2018-12-31T12:12
最後就是差這發,哈哈
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2019-01-04T17:35
最後就是差這隻
Suhail Hany avatar
By Suhail Hany
at 2019-01-06T07:19
MLB進場人數下滑 請小市場球隊共體時艱
Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2019-01-10T19:32
要怪就怪Joe West吧,紐約總部只是找不到理由改判而已
Callum avatar
By Callum
at 2019-01-15T07:55
可不可以開除Joe West.....
Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2019-01-19T09:03
Joe West, Angel, Bucknor這幾個爛裁判退不了的
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2019-01-19T11:52
超黑的
Kristin avatar
By Kristin
at 2019-01-23T12:30
事實上畫面看來確實很接近 雖然感覺是牆外
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2019-01-26T17:15
黑爆了
Iris avatar
By Iris
at 2019-01-29T00:52
曾公轉播的時候也有提到這條規則,
Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2019-01-31T03:14
但是前提是要球迷/觀眾有明顯伸進場內,干擾到野手手套守備
Hedy avatar
By Hedy
at 2019-02-04T16:54
但是今天太空人這打席是球已經明顯越過全壘打牆後方.
那幾位球迷也只是站在原地,並不是"手去伸進場內"妨礙守備.
Brianna avatar
By Brianna
at 2019-02-05T18:08
如果明顯 紐約總部早就改判了
Eartha avatar
By Eartha
at 2019-02-07T19:50
已經電視慢動作鏡頭重播,球高度至少比全壘打牆再高三四十
公分以上,這樣也能判出局.
Linda avatar
By Linda
at 2019-02-09T00:29
這球我覺得可以吵到WS結束了XDDDD
Agatha avatar
By Agatha
at 2019-02-11T11:23
如果最後襪襪冠軍會被說不純嗎
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2019-02-13T00:01
這樣建議大聯盟總部修改規則,以後外野區全都不准坐人.
否則近今天這線審的判定標準,球碰到外野觀眾就是妨礙守備.
William avatar
By William
at 2019-02-13T10:14
看最後裁判報告怎講 west為何認定防礙以及為何最後沒改判
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2019-02-13T14:07
(等著看如果轉換球場到紅襪當主場時,
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2019-02-16T20:15
有機會酸紅襪,一定很多人不會放過的啦
William avatar
By William
at 2019-02-21T14:12
若紅襪球員發生同樣情況被球迷碰到,會不會判出局?)
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2019-02-22T04:03
很明顯是球場內 https://i.imgur.com/FYDKIfL.png
Adele avatar
By Adele
at 2019-02-24T05:53
判決也是比賽的一部份,去年道奇被轟的亂七八糟,不是也有
Caitlin avatar
By Caitlin
at 2019-02-27T04:29
樓上那張一點都不明顯好嗎...
Tom avatar
By Tom
at 2019-03-03T10:48
我只是單純欣賞季後賽,沒偏任何一隊
Anonymous avatar
By Anonymous
at 2019-03-06T20:27
有人說明顯場內 也有人說明顯場外 風向好亂阿
Oscar avatar
By Oscar
at 2019-03-11T16:06
明顯都不明顯了XDDDD
Wallis avatar
By Wallis
at 2019-03-13T10:12
我襪迷 但我也覺得那張只是角度問題...
Rosalind avatar
By Rosalind
at 2019-03-16T23:01
差了半支手臂(前臂)高度,還能得出明顯場內的結論?
Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2019-03-19T17:22
上面那張像場內
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2019-03-24T01:26
該說 手套和球迷手碰撞點在場內還場外?
如果手套在黃線內就能接到,那算防礙嗎
Ursula avatar
By Ursula
at 2019-03-28T00:09
影片更清楚 照片那個位置配合貝茲撞牆處
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2019-04-01T04:55
就是不明顯才維持原判吧...跟昨天左外野那球一樣,
Callum avatar
By Callum
at 2019-04-02T17:12
https://i.imgur.com/LWQm4js.jpg 補一張照片讓大家討論
Kyle avatar
By Kyle
at 2019-04-06T13:23
再配合arts大的照片
David avatar
By David
at 2019-04-06T15:47
這球是場外,誇張誤判
Kyle avatar
By Kyle
at 2019-04-08T10:07
樓上這張照片後面觀眾表情超有戲XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Regina avatar
By Regina
at 2019-04-09T10:26
我也覺得非常難判斷 看兩張不同角度的圖,白衣男左手指已經
超線,右手又往前伸,很難斷定碰撞點到底是場內場外
David avatar
By David
at 2019-04-12T10:42
折衷判個二壘安打就好了
Edward Lewis avatar
By Edward Lewis
at 2019-04-17T00:51
判2B會比判妨礙更糟
場內就是妨礙 場外就是HR 2B怎麼樣都生不出來
Agnes avatar
By Agnes
at 2019-04-20T05:28
如果是打到手套彈回來算HR還2B?
Connor avatar
By Connor
at 2019-04-23T04:49
影片來了 剩28秒處開始看 https://bit.ly/2yKdVla
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2019-04-27T22:42
如果是在空中打到手套掉進場內應該是活球狀態
就像打到手套彈出場變全壘打一樣
Ingrid avatar
By Ingrid
at 2019-04-28T08:36
感覺是球跟球迷的接觸點在場外 球跟Betts的接觸點在場內
妨礙事實跟全壘打事實同時發生時 妨礙優先
Rosalind avatar
By Rosalind
at 2019-04-30T05:36
現有的影片就很難判定場內外,你怎麼說都有理
Connor avatar
By Connor
at 2019-05-02T13:41
球明顯越過牆了手套也是,要就改規則啊
Christine avatar
By Christine
at 2019-05-04T20:03
目前各角度都沒辦法明顯判斷是場內場外
Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2019-05-07T17:51
這個play要說West有誤判 還是證據不足
Elizabeth avatar
By Elizabeth
at 2019-05-07T23:09
紐約總部其實是對的
Elizabeth avatar
By Elizabeth
at 2019-05-12T14:24
本來我認為是場外沒錯,但幾個影片看下來,還真分不出
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2019-05-16T14:22
台灣球場都不會有這種困擾
Jake avatar
By Jake
at 2019-05-21T14:16
正面接觸的那幾個球迷身體不是往前彎的,他們只是站直的明
Liam avatar
By Liam
at 2019-05-23T20:33
顯就是觀眾席上空啊
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2019-05-27T19:20
說實話 目前有的角度都看過 一定沒人能斷定場內場外
Rosalind avatar
By Rosalind
at 2019-06-01T15:31
Four5可以看白衣男 他左手指超線 右手臂往前 你很難判斷他
有沒超線 而他右手和其他幾人平行
Poppy avatar
By Poppy
at 2019-06-05T10:19
場內場外,really a tough call
Anthony avatar
By Anthony
at 2019-06-09T02:11
所以碰撞點在場內還場外 真的難說
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2019-06-09T06:41
不然球迷是站在場內嗎,Betts有到位沒錯但那個點是觀眾席上
Valerie avatar
By Valerie
at 2019-06-10T17:07
你看前面sa26那個圖好了,球迷要躺下嗎
Isabella avatar
By Isabella
at 2019-06-15T00:54
哪來明顯,Betts又不是靠著牆起跳,還有一步的距離吧。
Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2019-06-18T01:42
Art07那圖看來 球迷手都往前伸了呀
Emma avatar
By Emma
at 2019-06-19T20:30
白衣服超線是因為他從圓弧的另一邊伸過來,但他不是接觸到
Carol avatar
By Carol
at 2019-06-20T18:59
等等 看了幾次影片 球落下來前球迷碰到Mookie手套的位
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2019-06-23T15:02
的人
John avatar
By John
at 2019-06-27T10:37
置好像不能明確說是場外誒 真的看不太出來
Thomas avatar
By Thomas
at 2019-06-28T13:21
橘衣男的身體幾乎貼著全壘打牆內緣,加上明顯伸手,這說是
明顯在觀眾席上空有點牽強吧!?
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2019-06-29T23:19
sa26圖: 右邊球迷左手抓在圍欄上,你很難看出他們這幾位
身體/手是否有前傾進入場內
Wallis avatar
By Wallis
at 2019-07-04T14:46
影片看起來是球迷撞到手套才合起來的啊 主播也有說
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2019-07-08T19:27
要是沒擋到可能是本年度最佳美技 現在變最爭議Play XD
Lauren avatar
By Lauren
at 2019-07-12T09:04
看白衣男就知道觀眾站直但手往前伸,這樣怎麼判斷場內場
Doris avatar
By Doris
at 2019-07-13T22:28
他不是碰到的人 但他手的水平角度甚至比正面的還裡面
Franklin avatar
By Franklin
at 2019-07-17T21:54
很中立的說 這play一點都不明顯 不知為何一堆人說明顯場內/
外 這太難斷定
Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2019-07-19T05:41
光憑這幾個影片能看出場內外根本神眼朱老九
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2019-07-19T07:06
其實我看了規則之後覺得是誤判欸
Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2019-07-22T08:05
就情緒發言 +曾公帶風向 明明就無法確定場外的球
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2019-07-24T09:52
你站著試著做正面黑帽男的動作,微縮肚,手在胸前附近準備
抱球,幾個人的接觸點就在那邊
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2019-07-29T00:02
在那誤判啥? 要怪去怪那個擋畫面的保全
Bethany avatar
By Bethany
at 2019-07-31T03:22
沒接到的話球一定落在場外
Mookie碰到球的時候我第一時間也覺得是在場外
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2019-08-01T18:07
反映誤判跟場外比較多是因為把BETTS跟觀眾拿掉 這球100%
Kristin avatar
By Kristin
at 2019-08-03T00:16
就是不明顯 無證據所以維持原判吧
William avatar
By William
at 2019-08-05T06:34
因為場地是圓的,所以白衣手會超線直線伸過來
Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2019-08-08T16:34
會出去 就是BETTS拚了一個動作導致出現爭議
Bennie avatar
By Bennie
at 2019-08-11T01:05
白衣男右手指向鏡頭顯然不跟牆平行
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2019-08-12T14:56
一直說很明顯的畫面有比mlb官方多嗎
Odelette avatar
By Odelette
at 2019-08-17T14:03
但他如果手套在場內就能接到 卻被碰撞 算不算防礙?
對阿 怎麼看都是不明顯 真的佩服那些說明顯的
Catherine avatar
By Catherine
at 2019-08-19T04:55
讓你覺得好像幾個人都出去撈,其實正面的在圓弧內沒有出去
Elma avatar
By Elma
at 2019-08-23T10:40
因為他整個人是向場外延伸到極限才撈到球的
應該不是在全壘打線的正上方
Blanche avatar
By Blanche
at 2019-08-25T22:10
應該去紐約總部應徵
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2019-08-28T20:48
但球迷沒擋我是覺得這球他接的到
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2019-08-30T01:38
因為守備員將身體延展出球場範圍去守備是被允許的
你不能說如果沒有觀眾他100%ru, 1j62l4
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2019-09-01T21:59
要改判不是一堆有的沒的感覺+推測 是要明確的畫面
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2019-09-04T03:12
sa的圖看起來橘衣男啤酒肚就在牆上,但是arts的圖才
看得出來其實離牆還有一段距離
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2019-09-07T21:46
100%接不到那顆球 所以場內場外很重要
Anonymous avatar
By Anonymous
at 2019-09-10T01:20
影片可以看官網這段參考
官網: https://atmlb.com/2PFTUDs
Isabella avatar
By Isabella
at 2019-09-14T01:02
從球迷的角度看不大清楚 如果你眼睛跟著Mookie
Ula avatar
By Ula
at 2019-09-15T20:01
Mookie不跳,應該出去了無誤,但這一跳,從影片看來,
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2019-09-19T06:41
應該不會覺得他手套伸出去的位置是在場內
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2019-09-22T10:57
雖然最清楚的圖沒了,不過這判決很明顯有問題。先想想
滑壘鏟人怎麼判-只要沒有明顯意圖就不會判妨礙。球迷
明顯沒有惡意伸手出來 結果判妨礙就有鬼。
Sandy avatar
By Sandy
at 2019-09-24T19:36
影片betts還飛了一下 才撞牆勒,跟我說明顯 你以為爬牆喔
Rebecca avatar
By Rebecca
at 2019-09-29T07:28
但還是沒有畫面能斷定 這球太難說是場內還場外了
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2019-09-29T16:58
球和手套接觸的垂直線看起來很接近是場內,但真的很接近
,真的難判
Joseph avatar
By Joseph
at 2019-10-03T09:07
意圖這點更硬,根本裁判自由心證
Dorothy avatar
By Dorothy
at 2019-10-06T04:46
以後可能要像足球那樣在球門線裝感應器最準
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2019-10-10T21:17
都伸手了還意圖勒 我伸手碰了女生大腿 但我沒意圖喔
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2019-10-13T05:51
以後比賽球團要把外野前三排全部買下來放暗樁
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2019-10-14T15:46
現在外野手一個比一個會撈這種HR球
Rosalind avatar
By Rosalind
at 2019-10-15T08:32
難道要像網球那樣裝鷹眼??? 哈哈
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2019-10-18T21:48
如果球在場外球迷伸手哪有問題.......
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2019-10-19T05:41
Seek這個不錯 有最直接的輔助判決最實在
Bethany avatar
By Bethany
at 2019-10-24T04:46
先不管誤不誤判 光是製造出這個接近的play
就已經是五星級守備了
Linda avatar
By Linda
at 2019-10-28T01:27
球迷沒惡意還是伸手越牆,過失就沒殺人喔。
Una avatar
By Una
at 2019-10-28T12:54
其實把牆改成跳不到或是座位後退球迷碰不到最保險
Una avatar
By Una
at 2019-10-29T11:58
https://i.imgur.com/VgcmahQ.jpg
這張就很明顯球迷的手都伸超過牆了
Leila avatar
By Leila
at 2019-10-31T15:18
但重點是在碰撞手套時的點到底場內場外,沒有明顯且直接
Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2019-11-04T01:10
的證據,才會這樣爭議。
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2019-11-06T21:53
問題就是在於沒有影片可以證明球在場內,就不可能判出
局啊 ,不然就真的規定不準坐人免得有爭議
Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2019-11-11T19:37
還好不是在洋基球場,洋基的右外野好像更矮...
Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2019-11-13T18:43
這是後話,你難斷定West到底看到場內還外
Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2019-11-15T11:31
West斷定他在場內,而畫面無法證明他誤判
所以維持原判決
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2019-11-16T01:26
除非West今天自己說他沒看到、不確定
Una avatar
By Una
at 2019-11-20T15:56
誰跟你不可能判出局... 是沒畫面能夠推翻裁判原判決
而維持原判的結果就是出局 搞懂輔助判決好嗎
Elizabeth avatar
By Elizabeth
at 2019-11-24T15:07
全壘打牆往前50公分,觀眾席後縮50公分,應該就只有外野
手是NBA字母哥時會有爭議了
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2019-11-29T01:23
裁判說他看到接觸點在場內 -> 沒明確畫面證實裁判有錯
-> 因此維持原判 -> 出局 很難懂?
Catherine avatar
By Catherine
at 2019-12-01T22:29
我當然懂l大的意思,我是說這麼接近的play west賭定妨
礙守備這才是問題
Cara avatar
By Cara
at 2019-12-04T16:05
給大家看一下賽後Joe West怎麼講..他還是覺得她是對的
https://twitter.com/PeteAbe/status/1052808457059852288
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2019-12-09T14:44
Well, 你非West, 用這論點攻擊他沒有說服力
全場只有他在那角度 你沒證據不能說他錯
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2019-12-09T22:59
MLB真的很智障 第一排這麼近 再來整天怪花錢買票的球迷
Heather avatar
By Heather
at 2019-12-10T22:10
恩 只要West站住立場 沒有畫面證明他錯 這play就不會算誤判
Iris avatar
By Iris
at 2019-12-13T21:19
Pete Abraham講了:維持原判代表沒有足夠證據改判而已
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2019-12-18T07:55
對啊 整個play就並非誤判 除非有新證據能推翻West
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2019-12-20T17:29
就目前看來 可能要有球迷沿著黃線水平面攝影才有可能推翻
不然整個MLB的畫面應該都翻光了 還是無法證明West誤判
Freda avatar
By Freda
at 2019-12-23T12:49
其實小熊真有過一段第一排觀眾不太敢接球的時期 :p
Callum avatar
By Callum
at 2019-12-28T06:08
沒有證據一直被嗆誤判也是蠻衰?
Selena avatar
By Selena
at 2019-12-31T09:12
看West的說法 關鍵不是球的位置 而是球迷碰到Mookie的
手套讓它合起來 現在問題是那個時間點是場內還場外 如
果是場內就適用那條規則的後段 聯盟沒改判的依據是沒有
足夠畫面 所以是保全擋掉2分打點
Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2020-01-03T23:47
哈哈 樓上把保全拉來當戰犯 hen過分~~
對 其實關鍵一直都是碰撞點 而West認定在場內 真的無話可說
Suhail Hany avatar
By Suhail Hany
at 2020-01-06T21:48
怕的是保全留給太空人球迷情緒出口...
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2020-01-08T05:37
球迷 保全 West dochi? 反正就是想選個女巫出來燒吧
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2020-01-13T00:16
所以就變成兩邊各為其主。但曾公講了規則被大家誤用。
Dinah avatar
By Dinah
at 2020-01-15T20:36
現在就缺場邊球迷有沒有人錄到這球了,好刺激好爭議啊
Yedda avatar
By Yedda
at 2020-01-19T05:09
我真的分不出來 但不懂Joe West有什麼好罵的 他滿有可能
沒有誤判
Mary avatar
By Mary
at 2020-01-19T21:46
我覺得如果沒碰到手套 betts會接到
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2020-01-22T23:33
規則沒有誤用啊 重點就是訪談時West和Hinch說他認為接
Jake avatar
By Jake
at 2020-01-25T15:44
處發生在場內,然後Hinch覺得在場外 場邊錄像沒證據
與其說甚麼情緒出口,不如說這球大家自由心證有無出牆
Olivia avatar
By Olivia
at 2020-01-27T01:41
另外身為太空人球迷 請紅襪粉留點空間讓我們崩潰 謝謝
George avatar
By George
at 2020-01-27T20:22
我熊迷已經潰完了,羨慕還有得崩的
Xanthe avatar
By Xanthe
at 2020-01-28T15:09
每張圖都說這張很明顯 點進去都沒說服力 ....
Jacob avatar
By Jacob
at 2020-01-29T00:30
樓上ypw大的發言戳到我笑點XD
Bennie avatar
By Bennie
at 2020-02-02T02:25
手若沒碰到手套,Betts接殺機率蠻大的,Betts反也是受害
者(被沒收了一個能進年度Top10的play...)
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2020-02-07T01:13
剛剛賽後的記者訪談 mookie有提到 那球他100%可以接到
Irma avatar
By Irma
at 2020-02-07T12:21
但他的手被球迷推了一下 所以miss掉了
mookie一開始也很surpirze那球被called out
William avatar
By William
at 2020-02-12T01:46
當一位防守球員會說那球我100%接不到嗎
George avatar
By George
at 2020-02-14T05:31
樓下你不用那麼嗆 我只是轉述
Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2020-02-15T13:25
若球迷手沒上去,betts幾乎可以確定接得到
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2020-02-18T20:37
很多人帶的崩潰的心情看~~~當然怎麼看都是全壘打
Tristan Cohan avatar
By Tristan Cohan
at 2020-02-22T10:45
會嗎?我第一次看也覺得全壘打,搞清楚狀況多看幾次就是5
0/50的球。
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2020-02-24T04:50
沒有其他角度確實看不出來是不是真的有出去,太接近了
Necoo avatar
By Necoo
at 2020-02-26T10:12
覺得就算第一排沒坐人 球打過去還不是一堆人會跑去搶接球
就只是看球的速度而已
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2020-02-27T15:58
我是裁判會判全壘打,但其實很接近很難說
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2020-03-01T05:25
結果最後因為這個誤判太色被淘汰就好笑了
Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2020-03-05T00:14
這球沒有誤判
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2020-03-08T06:45
只能說如果這球一開始判HR 應該也不會改判
太空人衰
Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2020-03-12T14:38
再怎麼樣也不會是全壘打吧 不是碰到mookie手套彈回廠
內嗎(印象中)
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2020-03-15T00:57
沒錯 但West認定球迷手進場內了 所以是干擾守備
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2020-03-15T14:21
喔喔回去看了一下 後來有彈到球迷手 那應該就是out
或HR了
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2020-03-20T00:17
印象球迷碰到球也有分場內外,撈場內的球是2B
Barb Cronin avatar
By Barb Cronin
at 2020-03-20T05:37
這球betts沒接到(沒球迷干擾),真的蠻有機會是全壘打。
Brianna avatar
By Brianna
at 2020-03-24T13:26
樓上一堆鷹眼 XD
比回放中心的還屌
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2020-03-27T09:42
West他以為他是鷹眼?就算看回放,角度也不清楚啊…
只能說太空人衰…
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2020-03-30T23:16
他不是鷹眼 但是他做出了判決 無法被推翻判決就成立
Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2020-04-04T00:23
沒什麼衰不衰 每個play本來就會分別有得利和失利的一方
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2020-04-07T06:51
何況今天根本沒有任何畫面能證明裁判誤判
Ida avatar
By Ida
at 2020-04-07T18:01
剛剛又看了一次MLB youtube頻道的剪輯,覺得這個PLAY真的
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2020-04-11T09:42
很接近,唯一有可能影響這個判決的鏡頭被保全擋到,但也不
Poppy avatar
By Poppy
at 2020-04-15T08:38
能怪保全,他當時就算沒擋到鏡頭,旁邊的觀眾也會擋到
球落下瞬間,大家都探頭往那邊看XD
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2020-04-17T11:16
也許該感謝保全? 他的一擋讓整個系列戰話題不斷XDD
Puput avatar
By Puput
at 2020-04-20T03:28
然後看了規則之後想請問,球飛過球,外野手去接,後果自負
Lucy avatar
By Lucy
at 2020-04-22T09:43
這沒問題,那如果球迷把手伸進場推了一下球員,這樣是不是
要算干擾?
James avatar
By James
at 2020-04-24T09:12
*飛過牆
Jacky avatar
By Jacky
at 2020-04-27T02:35
這個PLAY可以看到右邊有一位男子把左手撐在牆上,右手伸過
Poppy avatar
By Poppy
at 2020-04-28T19:13
去接這顆球,不知道這會不會算干擾?談得更細一點,如果一
Sarah avatar
By Sarah
at 2020-05-03T07:26
部分身體在場內,一部分身體在場外,然後場外的部分去影響
Freda avatar
By Freda
at 2020-05-03T22:29
野手接球,這樣算不算干擾?至少規則是沒有寫清楚的
Una avatar
By Una
at 2020-05-08T04:22
...基本上球迷接球大部分身體都在場內阿...
Kumar avatar
By Kumar
at 2020-05-09T05:17
推球員當然算干擾
你伸手去接場內的球當然也是干擾
Edwina avatar
By Edwina
at 2020-05-11T01:13
只能說Betts守的真的太好才爭取到這個判決
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2020-05-14T11:35
應該說如果球迷沒伸手這球很高機率會是HR...只能說球迷也
幫了紅襪一個忙,才有這個沒收的Play
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2020-05-19T08:22
裁判的判決也不能說他有錯,只能說外野跳得好...
Selena avatar
By Selena
at 2020-05-23T09:10
當然在外的身體碰到就算干擾阿!!!
Michael avatar
By Michael
at 2020-05-27T15:36
不然要整個人跳進場內才算干擾?規則要寫成這樣唷QQ"
Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2020-05-28T17:21
以後全壘打牆也架個鷹眼系統好了判斷球有沒有出場外
Zora avatar
By Zora
at 2020-05-29T17:31
所以是不是要下令所有球場的牆邊不能坐人阿
Frederica avatar
By Frederica
at 2020-06-02T22:33
就再表演一次給你看了、是要崩潰多久?

聯盟:太色只是監控 不是偷暗號

Lydia avatar
By Lydia
at 2018-10-18T10:54
來源: The USA Today 網址: https://tinyurl.com/yaxen58v MLB says Astros doing surveillance, not spying in dugouts 聯盟表示 太色是在做監控 不是在偷看 CLEVELAND (AP) — The Hou ...

ALCS邊看邊聊

Doris avatar
By Doris
at 2018-10-18T08:56
10/18(美國時間) ALCS 前四場紅襪3:1太空人 今天打線跟守備有調整 Correa回第四棒, Kemp調到七棒, Marisnick上來打第九棒 Reddick沒先發. Springer守右外, Marisnick守中外 13B/右Alex Bregman 2RF/右George Sprin ...

ALCS BOS @ HOU 美聯冠軍系列賽 G4

Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2018-10-18T08:24
先發打線 ║ALCS GAME║ 先發打線 ╔═◥ BOS Red Sox ◣═╗╭═╩═╩═╩═╩═╩═╩╮╔═◥ HOU Astros ◣╗ ║1 M. Betts (R) ║║ Bradley Jr. ║║1 A ...

10/17 ALCS Game 4 at HOU

Sierra Rose avatar
By Sierra Rose
at 2018-10-18T07:28
RED SOX https://i.imgur.com/tdo5zL0.jpg RHP Porcello RF Betts LF Benintendi DH Martinez SS Bogaerts 3B Devers 1B Pearce 2B Holt C Vazquez CF Bradley AS ...

太空人疑似偷拍休息區 傳印地安人警告

Elma avatar
By Elma
at 2018-10-18T02:34
太空人疑似偷拍休息區 傳印地安人警告紅襪 作者:賴意文 ‧ 2018年10月17日 14:40 據報導1名持有休士頓太空人球隊證件的男子,在聯盟冠軍賽首戰疑似偷拍波士頓紅襪休 息區,被紅襪主場保全請出媒體區。據傳太空人前個系列賽的對手克利夫蘭印地安人警告 紅襪注意這個人,也已經向大聯盟官方投訴。 這名被 ...