看了單場得分50+統計,原來老大這麼強! - NBA

Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2017-03-26T18:15

Table of Contents

※ 引述《huntai (婚帶)》之銘言:
: 來看看生涯有10以上場次的球員所對抗的球隊強度高低 (張伯倫, 貝勒爺沒資料) :
: 季後賽級別隊伍(%) 勝率過半(%) 東西區前4(%) 保護失分排名在前半段 (%)
: MJ 24/31 = 0.774 24/31 = 0.774 12/31 = 0.355 17/31 = 0.548
: Kobe 8/25 = 0.32 9/25 = 0.36 3/25 = 0.12 13/25 = 0.52
: R.Barry 8/14 = 0.571 4/14 = 0.286 隊伍太少前4沒意義 5/14 = 0.357
: Iverson 3/11 = 0.272 4/11 = 0.363 1/11 = 0.09 2/11 = 0.182
: LBJ 3/10 = 0.3 3/10 = 0.3 1/10 = 0.1 3/10 = 0.3
: Jabbar 3/10 = 0.3 4/10 = 0.4 隊伍太少前4沒意義 1/10 = 0.1

這次算好玩的.

如果把這些人的Game Score>40的生涯場次做個統計
(受限於BR的Game Score只從83-84年開始統計, 這次R.Barry 和 Jabbar 被排除掉)

Game Score = 粗略效率值
公式 : (PTS + 0.4 * FG - 0.7 * FGA - 0.4*(FTA - FT) + 0.7 * ORB + 0.3 *
DRB + STL + 0.7 * AST + 0.7 * BLK - 0.4 * PF - TOV)


Pts>50 GmSc>40 對手勝率過半 對手為季後賽球隊 對手為東西區前4
場次 場次 (%) (%) (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MJ 31 49 33/49=0.673 34/49=0.694 13/49=0.265

LBJ 10 16 7/16=0.438 7/16=0.438 5/16=0.313

Kobe 25 11 2/11=0.182 2/11=0.182 2/11=0.182

Iverson 11 6 1/6 =0.167 1/6 =0.167 1/6 =0.167

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Game Score跟得分兩個表兩相比較, 就可以區分誰比較偏向得分型,
誰比較偏向全能身手.


不過MJ GmSc>40的場次竟然多於Pts>50的場次, 蠻讓我意外的......



以下為GmSc>40的完整數據:

注: Opp Rank = (對方戰績 + 排名 E=East W=West)

Michael Jordan
Rk Date Tm Opp Opp Rank W/L FG% TRB AST STL BLK PTS GmSc
--------------------------------------
1 12/27/1984 CHI CLE 36-46 E8 W 0.606 7 11 3 0 45 40.1
2 01/26/1985 CHI ATL 34-48 E9 W 0.708 8 10 0 4 45 41.4
3 02/05/1985 CHI BOS 63-19 E1 L 0.560 12 7 4 1 41 40.1
4 02/12/1985 CHI DET 46-36 E4 W 0.613 15 5 4 0 49 40.9
5 01/08/1987 CHI POR 49-33 W3 W 0.588 4 5 3 2 53 42.1
6 02/22/1987 CHI CLE 31-51 E9 W 0.552 4 6 8 5 43 40.8
7 02/26/1987 CHI NJN 24-58 E10 W 0.640 8 3 3 2 58 51.2
8 03/04/1987 CHI DET 52-30 E3 W 0.564 7 3 3 3 61 47.6
9 03/24/1987 CHI PHI 45-37 E5 W 0.688 7 3 8 0 56 46
10 04/12/1987 CHI IND 41-41 E7 W 0.704 4 8 4 2 53 49.7
11 04/13/1987 CHI MIL 50-32 E3 W 0.516 9 4 4 3 50 42.1
12 04/16/1987 CHI ATL 57-25 E2 L 0.579 10 1 4 1 61 47.8
13 12/02/1987 CHI UTA 47-35 W5 W 0.630 4 9 3 3 47 43.5
14 12/12/1987 CHI HOU 46-36 W6 W 0.571 3 9 5 5 44 42.3
15 12/17/1987 CHI CLE 42-40 E6 W 0.645 3 6 4 1 52 45.3
16 01/09/1988 CHI UTA 47-35 W5 W 0.739 3 8 4 0 45 43.2
17 01/22/1988 CHI PHO 28-54 W9 W 0.680 4 13 4 4 42 45.6
18 03/18/1988 CHI BOS 57-25 E1 W 0.594 5 9 5 1 50 46.9
19 04/03/1988 CHI DET 54-28 E2 W 0.778 4 6 2 2 59 54.7
20 11/09/1988 CHI BOS 42-40 E8 W 0.545 3 2 9 2 52 44.4
21 11/16/1988 CHI PHI 46-36 E7 L 0.828 9 1 4 2 52 46.5
22 11/26/1988 CHI DEN 44-38 W6 L 0.704 11 7 1 0 52 42.3
23 12/20/1988 CHI LAL 57-25 W1 W 0.478 7 8 4 0 42 41
24 01/10/1989 CHI ATL 52-30 E4 W 0.586 10 9 3 0 48 42.8
25 01/15/1989 CHI BOS 42-40 E8 W 0.565 9 11 8 0 42 46.7
26 01/21/1989 CHI PHO 55-27 W3 L 0.714 14 8 2 1 53 47.9
27 02/16/1989 CHI MIL 49-33 E5 W 0.615 8 5 3 0 50 41.9
28 04/04/1989 CHI CHH 20-62 E12 W 0.667 10 12 6 1 33 42
29 04/13/1989 CHI IND 28-54 E10 L 0.567 11 13 4 2 47 45.8
30 11/03/1989 CHI CLE 42-40 E7 W 0.613 14 6 3 1 54 51.2
31 12/20/1989 CHI ORL 18-64 E12 L 0.541 5 7 4 0 52 40.7
32 01/21/1990 CHI NYK 45-37 E5 W 0.588 10 7 4 2 42 41.4
33 03/28/1990 CHI CLE 42-40 E7 W 0.622 18 6 4 1 69 64.6
34 03/30/1990 CHI NYK 45-37 E5 W 0.588 12 4 5 2 49 42.8
35 04/01/1990 CHI MIA 18-64 E11 W 0.690 6 7 3 3 47 40.3
36 04/20/1990 CHI BOS 52-30 E4 L 0.724 8 9 3 0 45 40.2
37 12/18/1990 CHI MIA 24-58 E13 W 0.636 9 6 6 2 39 41.5
38 12/27/1990 CHI GSW 44-38 E7 W 0.680 14 7 3 1 42 42.3
39 03/19/1992 CHI WSB 25-57 E13 W 0.633 11 3 1 1 51 43.1
40 03/24/1992 CHI DEN 24-58 W11 W 0.581 6 6 3 0 50 41.1
41 11/20/1992 CHI LAL 39-43 W8 L 0.538 13 7 1 3 54 41.2
42 12/23/1992 CHI WSB 22-60 E12 W 0.595 2 10 3 1 57 48.6
43 01/16/1993 CHI ORL 41-41 E9 L 0.551 6 1 5 0 64 44.8
44 03/12/1993 CHI CHH 44-38 E5 W 0.600 9 5 2 1 52 44.4
45 04/02/1993 CHI NJN 43-39 E6 W 0.667 7 7 9 1 40 40.1
46 04/16/1993 CHI MIL 28-54 E12 W 0.600 7 5 5 0 47 43.5
47 01/13/1996 CHI PHI 18-64 E15 W 0.643 10 2 1 1 48 40.5
48 03/07/1996 CHI DET 46-36 E7 W 0.750 11 2 6 0 53 47.7
49 01/21/1997 CHI NYK 57-25 E3 W 0.600 4 4 2 0 51 40.8



Lebron James
Rk Date Tm Opp Opp Rank W/L FG% TRB AST STL BLK PTS GmSc
--------------------------------------
1 03/20/2005 CLE TOR 33-49 W11 L 0.500 10 5 2 0 56 42.9
2 12/10/2005 CLE MIL 40-42 E8 L 0.655 7 7 2 0 52 42.9
3 01/14/2006 CLE PHO 54-28 W2 L 0.643 7 8 1 0 46 40.9
4 04/01/2006 CLE MIA 52-30 E2 W 0.640 12 9 2 0 47 43.8
5 01/15/2008 CLE MEM 22-60 W13 W 0.643 8 9 3 1 51 45
6 03/05/2008 CLE NYK 23-59 E14 W 0.533 8 10 4 0 50 44
7 02/04/2009 CLE NYK 32-50 E14 W 0.515 9 11 0 2 52 42.9
8 03/13/2009 CLE SAC 17-65 W15 W 0.533 4 9 2 3 51 43.4
9 12/30/2009 CLE ATL 53-29 E3 W 0.652 10 6 2 2 48 44.7
10 02/18/2010 CLE DEN 53-29 W4 L 0.455 13 15 2 4 43 40.1
11 02/03/2011 MIA ORL 52-30 E4 W 0.680 11 8 1 1 51 46.7
12 03/01/2012 MIA POR 28-38 W11 W 0.591 11 6 5 1 38 40.6
13 02/26/2013 MIA SAC 28-54 W13 W 0.609 8 16 2 1 40 44.2
14 03/03/2014 MIA CHA 43-39 E7 W 0.667 7 4 0 0 61 48.8
15 03/18/2014 MIA CLE 33-49 E10 W 0.737 6 4 2 3 43 42
16 12/10/2016 CLE CHO 32-40 E11 W 0.708 9 10 3 1 44 40


Kobe Bryant
Rk Date Tm Opp Opp Rank W/L FG% TRB AST STL BLK PTS GmSc
--------------------------------------
1 01/14/2002 LAL MEM 23-59 W13 W 0.618 5 4 1 0 56 46.3
2 02/12/2003 LAL DEN 17-65 W14 W 0.536 3 2 2 0 51 40.5
3 03/28/2003 LAL WAS 37-45 E9 W 0.517 5 3 3 0 55 41.5
4 12/20/2005 LAL DAL 60-22 W4 W 0.581 8 0 3 0 62 49.7
5 01/22/2006 LAL TOR 27-55 E12 W 0.609 6 2 3 1 81 63.5
6 11/30/2006 LAL UTA 51-31 W4 W 0.731 4 3 0 1 52 41.2
7 03/16/2007 LAL POR 32-50 W12 W 0.590 7 3 3 0 65 50.9
8 03/22/2007 LAL MEM 22-60 W15 W 0.541 5 4 0 0 60 43.2
9 04/15/2007 LAL SEA 31-51 W14 W 0.720 8 3 2 0 50 44.4
10 02/02/2009 LAL NYK 32-50 E14 W 0.613 0 3 0 1 61 47.3
11 04/10/2013 LAL POR 33-49 W11 W 0.519 8 5 3 4 47 42.8


Allen Iverson
Rk Date Tm Opp Opp Rank W/L FG% TRB AST STL BLK PTS GmSc
--------------------------------------
1 01/06/2001 PHI CLE 30-52 E11 W 0.667 3 3 3 1 54 41.3
2 12/18/2004 PHI MIL 30-52 E13 W 0.586 8 5 2 0 54 44.2
3 02/12/2005 PHI ORL 36-46 E10 W 0.472 4 6 5 1 60 48.5
4 12/23/2005 PHI ATL 26-56 E14 L 0.548 6 5 2 0 53 44.6
5 01/11/2006 PHI UTA 41-41 W9 L 0.640 3 9 4 0 46 41.3
6 03/17/2007 DEN PHO 61-21 W2 W 0.727 5 15 0 1 44 45.1







--
Tags: NBA

All Comments

Hedwig avatar
By Hedwig
at 2017-03-30T05:57
KB果然只會刷弱隊,難怪不像MJ還有我皇能在球隊當中
當老大
Irma avatar
By Irma
at 2017-04-02T05:37
kobe全勝!
Hardy avatar
By Hardy
at 2017-04-02T06:59
雖然說是全能身手 沒40分GmSc也很難超過40
Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2017-04-06T01:19
老大刷弱隊超強
Linda avatar
By Linda
at 2017-04-08T17:19
你皇不是去熱火當副手完,又對KI搖尾巴示意回來騎士
當副手?副手有人幫忙吸怪當然數據好
Aaliyah avatar
By Aaliyah
at 2017-04-10T12:22
kobe專刷弱隊不意外
Selena avatar
By Selena
at 2017-04-13T05:36
KB只會打弱隊刷數據
Mason avatar
By Mason
at 2017-04-18T04:44
副手迷成天幻想真的有夠可笑
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2017-04-19T06:43
真少人推,酸力不足,幫補
Charlie avatar
By Charlie
at 2017-04-20T03:05
今天皇上輸球 果然救駕數據文又來了
Faithe avatar
By Faithe
at 2017-04-20T13:49
欸,別這樣,好不容易找到數據爽一把你又拿MJ壓KOBE
Christine avatar
By Christine
at 2017-04-25T04:44
照nnn的說法,難怪去年副手可以拿全票mvp,怪都被
吸走了XDD
Isla avatar
By Isla
at 2017-04-29T14:25
Kobe果然救援王
David avatar
By David
at 2017-05-03T03:19
Kobe GmSc>40全勝 對60勝球隊還能打出GmSc>40的剛好
沒LBJ MJ雖然那一場輸了不過是季後賽跟超超賽打
Candice avatar
By Candice
at 2017-05-03T14:53
早說過 歐肥明星隊友只有KOBE會更顯得歐肥偉大
Harry avatar
By Harry
at 2017-05-07T15:55
又是一堆無聊數學文
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2017-05-08T01:01
母斯一輸馬上出來XD
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2017-05-11T12:54
MJ老粉要被柯粉打成LBJ粉囉XDD
Quanna avatar
By Quanna
at 2017-05-11T13:55
Kobe專刷弱隊不意外 總冠碰到強隊就原形畢露了
James avatar
By James
at 2017-05-15T09:19
我家姆斯好棒棒,不準你們說他壞話
Olive avatar
By Olive
at 2017-05-18T23:15
Kobe專刷弱隊啊 講到81就自動忽略刷數據
Ophelia avatar
By Ophelia
at 2017-05-19T21:25
虐菜王
Belly avatar
By Belly
at 2017-05-22T09:21
打弱隊刷數據 給推
Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2017-05-23T15:51
玻璃取暖地
Andrew avatar
By Andrew
at 2017-05-26T15:41
話說到底哪來這一堆奇怪進階數據阿
Charlotte avatar
By Charlotte
at 2017-05-29T05:02
晚點我寫一個拉基公式出來 提供大家使用
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2017-05-31T17:48
等你的公式哦
Genevieve avatar
By Genevieve
at 2017-06-02T03:43
完全不知道這算法的真實意義在哪?
Ophelia avatar
By Ophelia
at 2017-06-06T14:44
取暖文
Dora avatar
By Dora
at 2017-06-11T02:49
這個是怎麼得到的公式阿…
Yedda avatar
By Yedda
at 2017-06-12T06:05
這進階數據又有啥意義?
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2017-06-12T13:15
這篇有幾個氣到跳腳的科迷把這個MJ鐵粉打成騎迷了
Ophelia avatar
By Ophelia
at 2017-06-14T23:59
姆迷真的很猛,可以找各種數據捧詹
Megan avatar
By Megan
at 2017-06-17T12:43
看到ORB和AST*0.7就知道是為姆斯抬轎的垃圾公式了XD
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2017-06-21T19:41
彈塗迷處心積慮護主自慰真的好好笑XD
Regina avatar
By Regina
at 2017-06-26T13:49
明明單純比得分 硬要加入其他的數據比下Kobe
Irma avatar
By Irma
at 2017-06-27T20:48
數據公式王LBJ、Kobe永遠比不上數據王 滿意了嗎
Andy avatar
By Andy
at 2017-06-28T02:25
看一次笑一次 屌
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2017-06-30T22:16
數據詹迷真的很好笑輸球急跳腳
Jessica avatar
By Jessica
at 2017-07-05T19:47
解釋一下*0.7和*0.4的意義好嗎
Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2017-07-08T18:06
Kobe例行賽刷弱隊 得高分 很強 沒話說
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2017-07-10T18:08
麻煩只比得分好嗎 洩洩
Annie avatar
By Annie
at 2017-07-15T06:30
取暖文 QQ 酸酸們小心被丟護目鏡唷
Zanna avatar
By Zanna
at 2017-07-16T17:01
...就KOBE經不起檢視吧 人家 MJ就可以 不夠強就承認
啊 第十二名球員跟兩個前三比很丟臉??
Hedda avatar
By Hedda
at 2017-07-17T23:50
標題明明就檢視得分而已 就有人硬要套公式檢視
整體數據 真不知道是理解有問題還是其他地方怪怪的
Joe avatar
By Joe
at 2017-07-22T00:37
即然數據王LBJ這麼強 請他破kobe得分50+分先?
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2017-07-25T09:37
LBJ自己都說自己不是得分手了 有必要氣到跳腳?? 籃
球只靠自己得分??就會贏 難怪是第十二名球員...
Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2017-07-27T19:50
其實這篇單純討論50+的場次 只是原po要加公式討論
數據面 有點離題 如果樓上要討論得分跟贏球的關係
可以另外開一篇喔
Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2017-08-01T04:21
一輸球 數據迷就開始發文惹
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2017-08-03T13:27
某Q別這樣護主了啦很難看
Tom avatar
By Tom
at 2017-08-04T09:25
不看推文我還不知道原來婚大還身兼詹迷耶XDD
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2017-08-07T16:06
為什麼很難看??? 數據輸慘慘證明都在刷弱隊的才難
看吧
Erin avatar
By Erin
at 2017-08-09T01:41
而且是例行賽而已 季後賽 冠軍賽更別說了 被捧太高
什麼大心臟和關鍵時刻 也是用出手數來捧高印象罷了
Megan avatar
By Megan
at 2017-08-13T03:56
換另一個觀點,算這個要不要加入所待隊伍當時聯盟
戰績?
Hedwig avatar
By Hedwig
at 2017-08-17T14:23
某Q說kobe只會刷弱隊? 面對50+的隊伍保護失分排名
Eden avatar
By Eden
at 2017-08-21T05:43
在前半段kobe13/25=0.52 LBJ3/10 = 0.3是誰刷弱隊?
Sarah avatar
By Sarah
at 2017-08-23T18:28
果然打數據迷臉還是要用數據呢,樓上好用力呀

克勞佛爆發 快艇連6季駛進季後賽

Kelly avatar
By Kelly
at 2017-03-26T17:53
克勞佛爆發 快艇連6季駛進季後賽 聯合報 / 記者曾思儒╱即時報導 雖一度浪費16分領先,快艇隊今天在37歲老將克勞佛(Jamal Crawford)第四節大爆發下 仍甩開爵士隊糾纏,以108:95收下近5戰的第4勝,也成西區第4支拿到季後賽門票的隊伍 克勞佛全場28分有17分集中在最末節,第三節和保羅 ...

小河流:單挑能打爆我爹,即使他巔峰

Mary avatar
By Mary
at 2017-03-26T17:48
消息來源:https://voice.hupu.com/nba/2139158.html 內容: 快艇球員A.Rivers在接受TMZ採訪時表示,如果他和年輕的Doc Rivers單挑,他會打爆他爸 。 TMZ記者首先問到小河流有沒有和他爸單挑過,小里弗斯回答稱沒有,並表示他爸太老了。 隨後記者問到如 ...

開季前~整季勝場預測 vs 現在

Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2017-03-26T17:25
ESPN Insider privileges http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/17375776 季前預測 http://tinyurl.com/je9y5ut 西區的季前預測和現在的整體排名還蠻接近的,東區則差距較大。 主力球員意外受傷 或 季中交 ...

柯爾:杜蘭特復出還需要幾周時間

Emma avatar
By Emma
at 2017-03-26T16:41
https://udn.com/news/story/7002/2365501 2017-03-26 09:35聯合報 記者吳思儀╱報導 勇士球星杜蘭特(Kevin Durant)上個月底左膝受傷休兵,現在他的復原進度良好,雖然 已經可以做跳投和跑步的練習,但勇士仍保持耐心,謹慎面對。勇士總教練柯爾(St ...

關於一些籃球的英文

Tracy avatar
By Tracy
at 2017-03-26T16:06
※ 引述《js2a117573 (Randy)》之銘言: : 為甚麼很常看到cook這個詞? : 而且好像很常被用在後衛身上 : 例如: : curry still cooking! : 之類的 : 後衛跟煮什麼關係嗎? : Curry的綽號 chef(廚師)也跟煮有關係 : 還有運球很華麗的好像都會用dan ...