改變歷史一刻的原因 - 網球 Tennis
By Anthony
at 2008-07-07T12:36
at 2008-07-07T12:36
Table of Contents
1980 Wimbledon Final
(1)Bjorn Borg def.(2)John McEnroe
1-6 7-5 6-3 6-7 8-6
Borg完成溫布敦五連霸
1981 Wimbledon Final
(2)John McEnroe def.(1)Bjorn Borg
4-6 7-6 7-6 6-4
McEnroe終止Borg溫布敦五連霸霸業
2007 Wimbledon Final
(1)Roger Federer def.(2)Rafael Nadal
7-6 4-6 7-6 2-6 6-2
Federer完成五連霸
2008 Wimbledon Final
(2)Rafael Nadal def.(1)Roger Federer
6-4 6-4 6-7 6-7 9-7
Nadal終止Federer溫布敦五連霸霸業
=============================================
是不是有點湊巧呢,除了1981年和2008年的決賽盤數一個是4盤,一個是5盤之外,
其他都在重演27年前的歷史(事實上Rafa這一場也差一點四盤獲勝。)
Federer這場有沒有機會衛冕,當然有。但是請注意到藍底青字的部份,Federer竟然
沒有辦法靠者破發球局的優勢在前面四盤獲得盤數,都是要靠搶七才能搶贏。這對於
Federer是個很大的警訊。去年就已經發出很大的警訊給Federer,但是Federer沒有查
覺在今年使用相對應對策略。
Federer並沒有記取去年前四盤只靠兩個搶七拿下的教訓,今年用同樣的戰術對付Nadal。
也忘記去年最後第五盤到底是用什麼樣的戰術擊退Nadal的。其實這場輸了也不會太意外
,因為連續兩年,Federer在本身戰術使用上就連續犯了一個足以輸掉比賽的致命錯誤。
明眼人都看得出來,其實Rogi和Rafa在底線對拉上並不是在同一個層次上,不管是近四
年的法網準決賽+決賽,近兩年的溫網決賽。都是給人這樣的感覺。只要一陷入相持,
Federer就很難從對抽和對拉取得優勢,必須要從發球+突擊+上網來取得分數。當然這
是一個可應付的方式和策略之一。但是,還有一個更有效率的方法,Federer在這兩年的
決賽之中並沒有好好使用,那就是大多數時間用自己的反拍切球斜線切到Nadal的正拍去。
Rafa是屬於正拍帶有強烈上旋又可以打出很深落點的選手。打出去的球剛好都落在Rogi
的肩膀部份高位,不論是正拍或反拍,都造成Rogi的困擾。原本Rogi可以利用球在草地
上彈跳後向下的特性。去使用切球去面向Rafa的反拍。由於Rogi的切球在草地上會有下
沉的特性,使得Rafa的正拍上旋拉得再怎麼厲害,大部份的回球的高度大概也只會落在
Rogi的腰部,而不是Rogi的肩牓。這樣對於Rogi是屬於一個比較好出手的攻擊角度。而
且當一方在切,一方在硬拉的時候,拉的一方也因為身體一直處於蹲下,起來的運律,
而使身體和體能受到較大的損耗。即使Rafa反手切球也是很強,但是他如果使用轉身而
想用反手切球來反切Inside-Out角度來回應,需要一些握拍和移位變換準備時間,而且
在切球擊球上也會喪失先機,給Rogi反攻擊的機會,所以我預估Rafa也不會這樣做。
但是Rogi在這兩年後並沒有使用"多切一抽"的牽制戰術,我不曉得背後真正的動機是什
麼,而且今天雖然起大風,對Rafa的上旋抽球很有利,但是使用低沉的切球讓球行進的
方向很難預測,也是一個很好的辦法,結果Rogi竟然隨者Rafa的上旋抽球隨之起舞。
也許Rogi是顧慮到Rafa的反切也是很好,但兩個人的切球功力來說還是Rogi在對切上會
占得一些稍稍上風。Rafa在對抽上有優勢,而且大幅運用。同樣的,Rogi在對切上也有
優勢,且能大幅運用的話,其實他這兩年他在場上的形勢就不會那麼被動。不止Rogi該
用這招來制約Rafa,十年前的Pete也是用多切一抽的戰術來制約Andre。加上Andre的切
球水準只是中度水準,普普,造成了Andre在對於對方節奏變化上的應對顯示出迷惑性而
無法持續打出好球。同理,要是當年Sampras選擇跟Agassi留在底線上硬抽,而不以抽切
變化的迷惑性來制住Agassi的話,當年的Sampras有辦法在Agassi對戰中取得上風,而在
溫布敦獲取那麼多座冠軍嗎? 答案是不可能的。就是因為Sampras選擇了多切一抽的牽制
戰術,他才能在其他發球,截擊,甚至正拍突擊做為突破口,來擊敗Agassi,甚至獲得
大賽冠軍。如果十年前Pete堅持在底線與Andre對抽的話,今天我們看到Rogi在底線位置
被Rafa調離的慘樣,在當年的山阿之戰也會發生。
所以Federer要考慮多使用抽切的變化性,論抽球,今天你已經不是Nadal的對手,甚至
如果他在今年法網使用這個戰術,我想比數上他還不至於輸到這麼難看。而且更不幸的
消息是,Federer的整體狀態和身體機能有在走下坡的趨勢,Nadal還正在往上坡走。從
現在起,Federer更要學會打多一些經驗球的切抽的變換使用,而不是一直在底線跟對
方在硬抽蠻幹。值得注意的一個有趣的現象,反到是Nadal今天在反拍切球變化引誘
Federer在正反拍產生擊球失誤的情況比較多,這方面Nadal到是學起來了。反切的威力
,這是Nadal在近一兩年進步最多的地方,恭喜Nadal贏得這個冠軍,他該得的,而且
花了兩年五盤大戰才獲得的,代價很大,辛苦了,也期許他日後能往偉大球手邁進。
--
╔═══════════════╦════════╦═════╗
║ソフトバンク,軟體銀行四大天王 ║SOFTBANK║ ﹦ ║
╠═══════════════╩════════╩═════╣
║カズミ サイトウ,トシヤ スギウチ,ナギサ アラカキ,ツヨシ ワダ ║
║192cm,96kg 175cm,82kg 189cm,81kg 179cm,77kg ║
╚══════════════════════════════╝
--
(1)Bjorn Borg def.(2)John McEnroe
1-6 7-5 6-3 6-7 8-6
Borg完成溫布敦五連霸
1981 Wimbledon Final
(2)John McEnroe def.(1)Bjorn Borg
4-6 7-6 7-6 6-4
McEnroe終止Borg溫布敦五連霸霸業
2007 Wimbledon Final
(1)Roger Federer def.(2)Rafael Nadal
7-6 4-6 7-6 2-6 6-2
Federer完成五連霸
2008 Wimbledon Final
(2)Rafael Nadal def.(1)Roger Federer
6-4 6-4 6-7 6-7 9-7
Nadal終止Federer溫布敦五連霸霸業
=============================================
是不是有點湊巧呢,除了1981年和2008年的決賽盤數一個是4盤,一個是5盤之外,
其他都在重演27年前的歷史(事實上Rafa這一場也差一點四盤獲勝。)
Federer這場有沒有機會衛冕,當然有。但是請注意到藍底青字的部份,Federer竟然
沒有辦法靠者破發球局的優勢在前面四盤獲得盤數,都是要靠搶七才能搶贏。這對於
Federer是個很大的警訊。去年就已經發出很大的警訊給Federer,但是Federer沒有查
覺在今年使用相對應對策略。
Federer並沒有記取去年前四盤只靠兩個搶七拿下的教訓,今年用同樣的戰術對付Nadal。
也忘記去年最後第五盤到底是用什麼樣的戰術擊退Nadal的。其實這場輸了也不會太意外
,因為連續兩年,Federer在本身戰術使用上就連續犯了一個足以輸掉比賽的致命錯誤。
明眼人都看得出來,其實Rogi和Rafa在底線對拉上並不是在同一個層次上,不管是近四
年的法網準決賽+決賽,近兩年的溫網決賽。都是給人這樣的感覺。只要一陷入相持,
Federer就很難從對抽和對拉取得優勢,必須要從發球+突擊+上網來取得分數。當然這
是一個可應付的方式和策略之一。但是,還有一個更有效率的方法,Federer在這兩年的
決賽之中並沒有好好使用,那就是大多數時間用自己的反拍切球斜線切到Nadal的正拍去。
Rafa是屬於正拍帶有強烈上旋又可以打出很深落點的選手。打出去的球剛好都落在Rogi
的肩膀部份高位,不論是正拍或反拍,都造成Rogi的困擾。原本Rogi可以利用球在草地
上彈跳後向下的特性。去使用切球去面向Rafa的反拍。由於Rogi的切球在草地上會有下
沉的特性,使得Rafa的正拍上旋拉得再怎麼厲害,大部份的回球的高度大概也只會落在
Rogi的腰部,而不是Rogi的肩牓。這樣對於Rogi是屬於一個比較好出手的攻擊角度。而
且當一方在切,一方在硬拉的時候,拉的一方也因為身體一直處於蹲下,起來的運律,
而使身體和體能受到較大的損耗。即使Rafa反手切球也是很強,但是他如果使用轉身而
想用反手切球來反切Inside-Out角度來回應,需要一些握拍和移位變換準備時間,而且
在切球擊球上也會喪失先機,給Rogi反攻擊的機會,所以我預估Rafa也不會這樣做。
但是Rogi在這兩年後並沒有使用"多切一抽"的牽制戰術,我不曉得背後真正的動機是什
麼,而且今天雖然起大風,對Rafa的上旋抽球很有利,但是使用低沉的切球讓球行進的
方向很難預測,也是一個很好的辦法,結果Rogi竟然隨者Rafa的上旋抽球隨之起舞。
也許Rogi是顧慮到Rafa的反切也是很好,但兩個人的切球功力來說還是Rogi在對切上會
占得一些稍稍上風。Rafa在對抽上有優勢,而且大幅運用。同樣的,Rogi在對切上也有
優勢,且能大幅運用的話,其實他這兩年他在場上的形勢就不會那麼被動。不止Rogi該
用這招來制約Rafa,十年前的Pete也是用多切一抽的戰術來制約Andre。加上Andre的切
球水準只是中度水準,普普,造成了Andre在對於對方節奏變化上的應對顯示出迷惑性而
無法持續打出好球。同理,要是當年Sampras選擇跟Agassi留在底線上硬抽,而不以抽切
變化的迷惑性來制住Agassi的話,當年的Sampras有辦法在Agassi對戰中取得上風,而在
溫布敦獲取那麼多座冠軍嗎? 答案是不可能的。就是因為Sampras選擇了多切一抽的牽制
戰術,他才能在其他發球,截擊,甚至正拍突擊做為突破口,來擊敗Agassi,甚至獲得
大賽冠軍。如果十年前Pete堅持在底線與Andre對抽的話,今天我們看到Rogi在底線位置
被Rafa調離的慘樣,在當年的山阿之戰也會發生。
所以Federer要考慮多使用抽切的變化性,論抽球,今天你已經不是Nadal的對手,甚至
如果他在今年法網使用這個戰術,我想比數上他還不至於輸到這麼難看。而且更不幸的
消息是,Federer的整體狀態和身體機能有在走下坡的趨勢,Nadal還正在往上坡走。從
現在起,Federer更要學會打多一些經驗球的切抽的變換使用,而不是一直在底線跟對
方在硬抽蠻幹。值得注意的一個有趣的現象,反到是Nadal今天在反拍切球變化引誘
Federer在正反拍產生擊球失誤的情況比較多,這方面Nadal到是學起來了。反切的威力
,這是Nadal在近一兩年進步最多的地方,恭喜Nadal贏得這個冠軍,他該得的,而且
花了兩年五盤大戰才獲得的,代價很大,辛苦了,也期許他日後能往偉大球手邁進。
--
╔═══════════════╦════════╦═════╗
║ソフトバンク,軟體銀行四大天王 ║SOFTBANK║ ﹦ ║
╠═══════════════╩════════╩═════╣
║カズミ サイトウ,トシヤ スギウチ,ナギサ アラカキ,ツヨシ ワダ ║
║192cm,96kg 175cm,82kg 189cm,81kg 179cm,77kg ║
╚══════════════════════════════╝
--
Tags:
網球
All Comments
By Blanche
at 2008-07-07T16:54
at 2008-07-07T16:54
By Elma
at 2008-07-07T21:12
at 2008-07-07T21:12
By Gilbert
at 2008-07-08T01:30
at 2008-07-08T01:30
By Rebecca
at 2008-07-08T05:47
at 2008-07-08T05:47
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2008-07-08T10:05
at 2008-07-08T10:05
By Rae
at 2008-07-08T14:23
at 2008-07-08T14:23
By Tracy
at 2008-07-08T18:41
at 2008-07-08T18:41
By Adele
at 2008-07-08T22:58
at 2008-07-08T22:58
By Puput
at 2008-07-09T03:16
at 2008-07-09T03:16
By Eartha
at 2008-07-09T07:34
at 2008-07-09T07:34
By Todd Johnson
at 2008-07-09T11:52
at 2008-07-09T11:52
By Ingrid
at 2008-07-09T16:09
at 2008-07-09T16:09
By Connor
at 2008-07-09T20:27
at 2008-07-09T20:27
By Rosalind
at 2008-07-10T00:45
at 2008-07-10T00:45
By James
at 2008-07-10T05:03
at 2008-07-10T05:03
By Poppy
at 2008-07-10T09:20
at 2008-07-10T09:20
By Bethany
at 2008-07-10T13:38
at 2008-07-10T13:38
By John
at 2008-07-10T17:56
at 2008-07-10T17:56
By Linda
at 2008-07-10T22:14
at 2008-07-10T22:14
By Edith
at 2008-07-11T02:31
at 2008-07-11T02:31
By James
at 2008-07-11T06:49
at 2008-07-11T06:49
By Candice
at 2008-07-11T11:07
at 2008-07-11T11:07
By Erin
at 2008-07-11T15:25
at 2008-07-11T15:25
By Thomas
at 2008-07-11T19:42
at 2008-07-11T19:42
By Heather
at 2008-07-12T00:00
at 2008-07-12T00:00
By Edith
at 2008-07-12T04:18
at 2008-07-12T04:18
By Oliver
at 2008-07-12T08:36
at 2008-07-12T08:36
By Ethan
at 2008-07-12T12:53
at 2008-07-12T12:53
By Olive
at 2008-07-12T17:11
at 2008-07-12T17:11
By Oliver
at 2008-07-12T21:29
at 2008-07-12T21:29
By Skylar Davis
at 2008-07-13T01:47
at 2008-07-13T01:47
By Ophelia
at 2008-07-13T06:04
at 2008-07-13T06:04
By Hazel
at 2008-07-13T10:22
at 2008-07-13T10:22
By Belly
at 2008-07-13T14:40
at 2008-07-13T14:40
By Delia
at 2008-07-13T18:58
at 2008-07-13T18:58
By Enid
at 2008-07-13T23:15
at 2008-07-13T23:15
By Charlie
at 2008-07-14T03:33
at 2008-07-14T03:33
By Andy
at 2008-07-14T07:51
at 2008-07-14T07:51
By Ula
at 2008-07-14T12:09
at 2008-07-14T12:09
By David
at 2008-07-14T16:26
at 2008-07-14T16:26
By Carolina Franco
at 2008-07-14T20:44
at 2008-07-14T20:44
By David
at 2008-07-15T01:02
at 2008-07-15T01:02
By Hamiltion
at 2008-07-15T05:20
at 2008-07-15T05:20
By Donna
at 2008-07-15T09:37
at 2008-07-15T09:37
By Edith
at 2008-07-15T13:55
at 2008-07-15T13:55
By Todd Johnson
at 2008-07-15T18:13
at 2008-07-15T18:13
By Freda
at 2008-07-15T22:31
at 2008-07-15T22:31
By Adele
at 2008-07-16T02:48
at 2008-07-16T02:48
By Harry
at 2008-07-16T07:06
at 2008-07-16T07:06
By Harry
at 2008-07-16T11:24
at 2008-07-16T11:24
By Bennie
at 2008-07-16T15:42
at 2008-07-16T15:42
By Rae
at 2008-07-16T19:59
at 2008-07-16T19:59
By Puput
at 2008-07-17T00:17
at 2008-07-17T00:17
By Andrew
at 2008-07-17T04:35
at 2008-07-17T04:35
By Lucy
at 2008-07-17T08:53
at 2008-07-17T08:53
By Ingrid
at 2008-07-17T13:10
at 2008-07-17T13:10
By Damian
at 2008-07-17T17:28
at 2008-07-17T17:28
By Elvira
at 2008-07-17T21:46
at 2008-07-17T21:46
By Audriana
at 2008-07-18T02:04
at 2008-07-18T02:04
By Charlotte
at 2008-07-18T06:21
at 2008-07-18T06:21
By Ula
at 2008-07-18T10:39
at 2008-07-18T10:39
By Edwina
at 2008-07-18T14:57
at 2008-07-18T14:57
By Steve
at 2008-07-18T19:15
at 2008-07-18T19:15
By Odelette
at 2008-07-18T23:32
at 2008-07-18T23:32
By Olga
at 2008-07-19T03:50
at 2008-07-19T03:50
By Quanna
at 2008-07-19T08:08
at 2008-07-19T08:08
By Michael
at 2008-07-19T12:26
at 2008-07-19T12:26
By Ivy
at 2008-07-19T16:43
at 2008-07-19T16:43
By Harry
at 2008-07-19T21:01
at 2008-07-19T21:01
By Ida
at 2008-07-20T01:19
at 2008-07-20T01:19
By Donna
at 2008-07-20T05:37
at 2008-07-20T05:37
By Candice
at 2008-07-20T09:54
at 2008-07-20T09:54
By Kristin
at 2008-07-20T14:12
at 2008-07-20T14:12
By Quanna
at 2008-07-20T18:30
at 2008-07-20T18:30
By Valerie
at 2008-07-20T22:48
at 2008-07-20T22:48
By Catherine
at 2008-07-21T03:05
at 2008-07-21T03:05
By Carolina Franco
at 2008-07-21T07:23
at 2008-07-21T07:23
By Regina
at 2008-07-21T11:41
at 2008-07-21T11:41
By Sierra Rose
at 2008-07-21T15:59
at 2008-07-21T15:59
By Linda
at 2008-07-21T20:16
at 2008-07-21T20:16
By Michael
at 2008-07-22T00:34
at 2008-07-22T00:34
By Frederic
at 2008-07-22T04:52
at 2008-07-22T04:52
By Michael
at 2008-07-22T09:10
at 2008-07-22T09:10
By Tracy
at 2008-07-22T13:27
at 2008-07-22T13:27
By Elma
at 2008-07-22T17:45
at 2008-07-22T17:45
By Erin
at 2008-07-22T22:03
at 2008-07-22T22:03
By Joseph
at 2008-07-23T02:21
at 2008-07-23T02:21
By Rebecca
at 2008-07-23T06:38
at 2008-07-23T06:38
By Hedda
at 2008-07-23T10:56
at 2008-07-23T10:56
By Mason
at 2008-07-23T15:14
at 2008-07-23T15:14
By Lauren
at 2008-07-23T19:32
at 2008-07-23T19:32
By Odelette
at 2008-07-23T23:49
at 2008-07-23T23:49
By Erin
at 2008-07-24T04:07
at 2008-07-24T04:07
By Queena
at 2008-07-24T08:25
at 2008-07-24T08:25
By Yedda
at 2008-07-24T12:43
at 2008-07-24T12:43
By Odelette
at 2008-07-24T17:00
at 2008-07-24T17:00
By Poppy
at 2008-07-24T21:18
at 2008-07-24T21:18
By Agatha
at 2008-07-25T01:36
at 2008-07-25T01:36
By Eartha
at 2008-07-25T05:54
at 2008-07-25T05:54
By Isabella
at 2008-07-25T10:11
at 2008-07-25T10:11
By Dora
at 2008-07-25T14:29
at 2008-07-25T14:29
By Anonymous
at 2008-07-25T18:47
at 2008-07-25T18:47
By Selena
at 2008-07-25T23:05
at 2008-07-25T23:05
By Kelly
at 2008-07-26T03:22
at 2008-07-26T03:22
By Faithe
at 2008-07-26T07:40
at 2008-07-26T07:40
By Wallis
at 2008-07-26T11:58
at 2008-07-26T11:58
By Blanche
at 2008-07-26T16:16
at 2008-07-26T16:16
By Daph Bay
at 2008-07-26T20:33
at 2008-07-26T20:33
By Franklin
at 2008-07-27T00:51
at 2008-07-27T00:51
By Valerie
at 2008-07-27T05:09
at 2008-07-27T05:09
By Cara
at 2008-07-27T09:27
at 2008-07-27T09:27
By Delia
at 2008-07-27T13:44
at 2008-07-27T13:44
By Mia
at 2008-07-27T18:02
at 2008-07-27T18:02
By Gary
at 2008-07-27T22:20
at 2008-07-27T22:20
By Kelly
at 2008-07-28T02:38
at 2008-07-28T02:38
By Olive
at 2008-07-28T06:55
at 2008-07-28T06:55
By Dinah
at 2008-07-28T11:13
at 2008-07-28T11:13
By Skylar Davis
at 2008-07-28T15:31
at 2008-07-28T15:31
By Ethan
at 2008-07-28T19:49
at 2008-07-28T19:49
By Jacob
at 2008-07-29T00:06
at 2008-07-29T00:06
By Agatha
at 2008-07-29T04:24
at 2008-07-29T04:24
By Lily
at 2008-07-29T08:42
at 2008-07-29T08:42
By Zenobia
at 2008-07-29T13:00
at 2008-07-29T13:00
By Margaret
at 2008-07-29T17:17
at 2008-07-29T17:17
By Edward Lewis
at 2008-07-29T21:35
at 2008-07-29T21:35
By Andy
at 2008-07-30T01:53
at 2008-07-30T01:53
By Zanna
at 2008-07-30T06:11
at 2008-07-30T06:11
By Elma
at 2008-07-30T10:28
at 2008-07-30T10:28
By Jake
at 2008-07-30T14:46
at 2008-07-30T14:46
By Donna
at 2008-07-30T19:04
at 2008-07-30T19:04
By Olive
at 2008-07-30T23:22
at 2008-07-30T23:22
By Lauren
at 2008-07-31T03:39
at 2008-07-31T03:39
By Blanche
at 2008-07-31T07:57
at 2008-07-31T07:57
By Tristan Cohan
at 2008-07-31T12:15
at 2008-07-31T12:15
By Poppy
at 2008-07-31T16:33
at 2008-07-31T16:33
By Kelly
at 2008-07-31T20:50
at 2008-07-31T20:50
By Carolina Franco
at 2008-08-01T01:08
at 2008-08-01T01:08
By George
at 2008-08-01T05:26
at 2008-08-01T05:26
By Eartha
at 2008-08-01T09:44
at 2008-08-01T09:44
By Thomas
at 2008-08-01T14:01
at 2008-08-01T14:01
By Regina
at 2008-08-01T18:19
at 2008-08-01T18:19
By Freda
at 2008-08-01T22:37
at 2008-08-01T22:37
By Freda
at 2008-08-02T02:55
at 2008-08-02T02:55
By Kristin
at 2008-08-02T07:12
at 2008-08-02T07:12
By Robert
at 2008-08-02T11:30
at 2008-08-02T11:30
By Jacob
at 2008-08-02T15:48
at 2008-08-02T15:48
By Oliver
at 2008-08-02T20:06
at 2008-08-02T20:06
By Candice
at 2008-08-03T00:23
at 2008-08-03T00:23
By Franklin
at 2008-08-03T04:41
at 2008-08-03T04:41
By Kristin
at 2008-08-03T08:59
at 2008-08-03T08:59
By Ida
at 2008-08-03T13:17
at 2008-08-03T13:17
By Kama
at 2008-08-03T17:34
at 2008-08-03T17:34
By Doris
at 2008-08-03T21:52
at 2008-08-03T21:52
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2008-08-04T02:10
at 2008-08-04T02:10
By Carol
at 2008-08-04T06:28
at 2008-08-04T06:28
By George
at 2008-08-04T10:45
at 2008-08-04T10:45
By Victoria
at 2008-08-04T15:03
at 2008-08-04T15:03
By Oscar
at 2008-08-04T19:21
at 2008-08-04T19:21
By Gilbert
at 2008-08-04T23:39
at 2008-08-04T23:39
By Necoo
at 2008-08-05T03:56
at 2008-08-05T03:56
By Caitlin
at 2008-08-05T08:14
at 2008-08-05T08:14
By Jake
at 2008-08-05T12:32
at 2008-08-05T12:32
By Damian
at 2008-08-05T16:50
at 2008-08-05T16:50
By Lucy
at 2008-08-05T21:07
at 2008-08-05T21:07
By Queena
at 2008-08-06T01:25
at 2008-08-06T01:25
By Carolina Franco
at 2008-08-06T05:43
at 2008-08-06T05:43
Related Posts
Roddick的習慣
By Frederic
at 2008-07-07T11:43
at 2008-07-07T11:43
Safin在溫網後的排名
By Suhail Hany
at 2008-07-07T11:42
at 2008-07-07T11:42
現場轉播的史詩神話
By Suhail Hany
at 2008-07-07T11:38
at 2008-07-07T11:38
Re: 2008 Wimbledon Champion
By Bennie
at 2008-07-07T11:36
at 2008-07-07T11:36
北京奧運.....決戰紫禁之巔
By Una
at 2008-07-07T11:26
at 2008-07-07T11:26