假設交易.... - 布魯克林籃網 Brooklyn Nets

By Hedy
at 2007-01-06T22:01
at 2007-01-06T22:01
Table of Contents
我來po一個很誇張的交易
牽涉多隊
送出 加入
Utah Jazz
Mehmet Okur $8,250,000 Mike Miller 7500000
Memphis Grizzlies
Pau Gasol 12338437 Vince Carter 15101626
Stromile Swift 5400000 Steve Francis 15070000
Eddie Jones 15680000 Antoine Wright 1000000
Mike Miller 7500000 Mehmet Okur 8250000
New York Knicks
Steve Francis 15070000 Eddie Jones 15680000
New Jersey Nets
Vince Carter 15101626 Pau Gasol 12338437
Antoine Wright 1000000 Stromile Swift 5400000
嗯 雖然不可能成真但是討論看看吧 應該有對等吧
交易後 各隊先發變為
Utah Memphis Nets
or
C Boozer Okur Gasol Gasol
PF Millsap Warrick Swift Swift
SF AK Gay RJ Nachbar
SG Miller VC Adams RJ
PG DW SF3 KIDD KIDD
Utah 一直缺優良的sg 內線構強大了
Memphis Gasol 想走 缺pg 陣中有幾隻優良新秀
我們 VC 換Gasol +Swift (不在灰熊未來藍圖中 算小配菜)
紐約尼克先發沒變 將SF3清出 換替補有經驗的後衛
薪資應該是沒錯 可在搭配選秀權
大家覺得這樣交易如何? 有競爭力嗎?
ꔊ
※ 編輯: jasonvan 來自: 125.232.181.44 (01/06 22:10)
推 jasonvan:= = 修到誰的推文了SORRY 01/06 22:10
→ ajstyle:被修掉了.... 01/06 22:10
→ jasonvan:樓上大再PO一次吧 01/06 22:11
→ ajstyle:我說法蘭西斯不要....尼克的消息是他暴銷了...準備釋出 01/06 22:10
→ ajstyle:所以他的價值或許幾乎沒有了吧 01/06 22:11
推 okeydokey:沒差XD 反正我覺得戰績現在不錯的爵士 短期內應該不會來 01/06 22:11
→ okeydokey:做交易 還有樓上Francis不會來籃網所以沒差啦XD 01/06 22:12
→ ajstyle:再來灰熊不會一次放兩個內線吧....這樣他內線就垮了吧 01/06 22:12
→ okeydokey:Nachbar現在當先發好像也太早... 01/06 22:13
推 jasonvan:可是Warrick 先發表現很好阿 很值得養 Swift 本來灰熊就. 01/06 22:13
推 ajstyle:你猜測的陣容說真的感覺不一定比較強.... 01/06 22:16
→ ajstyle:感覺找個活動力夠的內線或許比較適合籃網 01/06 22:16
→ ajstyle:或者該說那樣子Kidd的風格才打的出來吧 01/06 22:17
推 okeydokey:推樓上 現在的缺的只是人力 找個能配合籃網球風的就好了 01/06 22:18
推 jasonvan:?? Swift 不是夠有活動力了嗎? 這是交易VC我能想到最好 01/06 22:19
推 ajstyle:不過說真的.一直在想活動力夠的.而且有交易機會的. 01/06 22:20
→ jasonvan:的方式了 렠 01/06 22:20
→ ajstyle:所以我還真的想不到啊 01/06 22:21
→ jasonvan:如果真能換到這種陣容感覺 內外線攻守比較均衡 01/06 22:22
→ ajstyle:他是不算差.不過感覺不需要放VC多換賈索吧 01/06 22:22
→ jasonvan:就把Swift當馬丁來看 還多一個耶穌 比大前年的籃網應該 01/06 22:22
→ jasonvan:加強很多吧 01/06 22:23
推 happyeg:要三劍客走可以!交出至少Elton Brand(A+)等級的中/大前鋒 01/06 22:17
推 jasonvan:大家覺得Pau Gasol 不算是 Elton Brand 等級的嗎? 01/06 22:26
推 bearyou:Jazz那邊應該是很難有動到Okur的交易... 01/06 22:38
推 happyeg:以數據而言,完全不夠格!但並不是全看數據的! 01/06 22:38
→ happyeg:而是Gasol打球感覺上沒有Brand拼命!強度方面好像也弱一些 01/06 22:39
→ happyeg:,而且球風好像也和籃網格格不入...?Brand好像比較容易適 01/06 22:40
→ happyeg:應!當然這都是小弟個人淺薄的看法啦! 01/06 22:41
→ happyeg:當然交易內容中的Swift很吸引人啦!不過等到他有以前野獸 01/06 22:42
→ happyeg:的10分之8左右時?KIDD幾歲了呢?能夠繼續叱吒風雲指揮交通 01/06 22:44
→ happyeg:了嗎?就靠Gasol、RJ和KIDD,真的好嗎? 01/06 22:45
→ tkrover:其實Adams真的打得很好 可以把VC拿來做交易的成本啊 01/06 22:59
推 ajstyle:第一點.我可以說.RJ跟JK市場交易價值可能不到Brand 01/06 22:59
→ ajstyle:然後VC可以換到.不過快艇不會放內線.所以差不多不用考慮 01/06 23:00
→ ajstyle:然後市場上可以有Brand等級的大前鋒.感覺不到5位吧 01/06 23:01
→ ajstyle:甚至有很多都可能比VC價值還高.或者該說對方不可能換 01/06 23:02
→ ajstyle:不考慮任何東西.大概唯一有可能換的就是溜馬的小歐. 01/06 23:02
→ ajstyle:我是說有可能喔...不過難度也是不會低到哪裡 01/06 23:03
推 ajstyle:突然想到Boozer.據說開季之前也是被放到交易名單上的. 01/06 23:05
→ ajstyle:不過現在大概價值高了一大截吧.但是他應該也是有機會的 01/06 23:06
推 jasonvan:Boozer我曾考慮過 但是他更不適合籃網..不然爵士應該肯 01/06 23:12
→ jasonvan:換 爾且換了我們還有2個洞 雖然說VC去爵士 對VC很好 01/06 23:13
推 ajstyle:的確.他的內線嚇阻力比Gasol還差.不過籃板真的很猛 01/06 23:13
→ jasonvan:籃板?? 你確定他比Gasol強嗎? 要看爵士的隊型吧 01/06 23:15
→ jasonvan:今天的木桶柏籃板不是更猛.....因為禁區沒大人 01/06 23:16
推 ajstyle:Boozer單季籃板以前就有破10過.Gasol都沒有.去年內線就他 01/06 23:17
→ ajstyle:他還是沒有破9....所以我相信Boozer的籃板比較強. 01/06 23:18
→ ajstyle:不過Boozer矮.而且沒鍋子.補防意識差.不然爵士也不會想換 01/06 23:18
推 jasonvan:嗯可以在看看對友的籃板數 我覺得差不多吧 01/06 23:19
推 ajstyle:Gasol我是想到去年的灰熊.一個內線撐場籃板還是不多. 01/06 23:23
→ ajstyle:反正這兩個球員差別就是Gasol攻守較為全面 01/06 23:24
→ ajstyle:Boozer攻擊不錯防守很差.但是籃板意識不錯. 01/06 23:24
→ ajstyle:但是真的要說.兩個都不太適合Kidd的球風. 01/06 23:25
→ ajstyle:先不管有沒有機會.我是認為速度快.體力不錯.籃板還可以 01/06 23:26
→ ajstyle:Jamison.KG.Nowitzki.Howard.Odom.AK等.幾乎不可能.但是 01/06 23:28
→ ajstyle:這類型的選手才真的適合Kidd....感覺上啦. 01/06 23:29
推 jasonvan:Kidd 不是只會打開放性進攻 快攻也不一定要中前鋒參與 01/06 23:30
→ jasonvan:當初馬刺會想要KIDD難到只看上他的快攻能力嗎 01/06 23:31
推 ajstyle:半場當然也算還可以.但是持球時間要短的球員才適合. 01/06 23:31
→ ajstyle:或者該說那樣子的打法才是我最喜歡看到的打法吧 01/06 23:32
→ ajstyle:不過說老實話.Kidd的半場真的還算可以而已.比起開放性進攻 01/06 23:33
→ jasonvan:我只認同KG跟Howard 其他要嘛持球長要嘛版子少 01/06 23:33
→ jasonvan:AK? 算進攻型球員嗎? 他是防守型 跟誰都合吧 01/06 23:35
推 ajstyle:Jamison.Nowitzki也算持球時間還好版子也不錯吧.適應的了 01/06 23:37
→ ajstyle:AK喔.不知道他是不是真的攻擊那麼差.蠻全能的就把他算進去 01/06 23:39
→ ajstyle:我對AK的看法真的是一個很全能的球員.但是沒有特別頂尖的ꨠ 01/06 23:40
推 jasonvan:他們是我們禁區的解答? 01/06 23:39
→ ajstyle:至少在我玩FA裡面對他的偏見啦. 01/06 23:40
→ ajstyle:禁區.看是怎麼配吧.如果真的要大交易.當然就看跟誰交易 01/06 23:41
→ jasonvan:可以去爵士版看看大家對AK中距離跟外線進攻把握性的評價묠 01/06 23:41
→ ajstyle:如果是小變化的話.或許就看看會補誰.SWIFT就好.三劍客留下 01/06 23:41
→ jasonvan:那你可以PO一篇合理的對等交易出來看看吧 01/06 23:42
→ jasonvan:SWIFT 之流可以直接補就不用交易3劍客了 01/06 23:43
→ jasonvan:還有我想我跟你對 KIDD的能力有些許認知上的不同 01/06 23:44
→ jasonvan:所以停止吧 很難溝通= =+ 01/06 23:45
推 ajstyle:或許吧.認知有點差別.籃網有對等交易嗎.至少近幾年沒看過ꠠ 01/06 23:46
→ ajstyle:Martin換到啥.怎麼換到VC的.有時球團真的很神.不過通常笨 01/06 23:49
推 king007:martin是開太高吧 不符合身價 能拿到三個選秀算賺吧 01/07 00:02
→ king007:rod說起來還算是個蠻精明的總管 雖說要搬家要省錢就是= = 01/07 00:04
推 jasonvan:一切都是教練阿 其實交易的表現不差拉 教練不用罷了 01/07 00:11
推 jwk3:以okur的身手800萬跟本超便宜,而且還有三四年約誰要換@@" 01/09 00:54
Tags:
NBA
All Comments

By Yuri
at 2007-01-07T02:36
at 2007-01-07T02:36

By Kelly
at 2007-01-07T07:12
at 2007-01-07T07:12

By Blanche
at 2007-01-07T11:47
at 2007-01-07T11:47

By Elma
at 2007-01-07T16:23
at 2007-01-07T16:23

By Lauren
at 2007-01-07T20:59
at 2007-01-07T20:59

By Anonymous
at 2007-01-08T01:34
at 2007-01-08T01:34

By Erin
at 2007-01-08T06:10
at 2007-01-08T06:10

By Eartha
at 2007-01-08T10:45
at 2007-01-08T10:45

By Jacob
at 2007-01-08T15:21
at 2007-01-08T15:21

By Andrew
at 2007-01-08T19:57
at 2007-01-08T19:57

By Isabella
at 2007-01-09T00:32
at 2007-01-09T00:32

By Iris
at 2007-01-09T05:08
at 2007-01-09T05:08

By Hedwig
at 2007-01-09T09:43
at 2007-01-09T09:43

By Zanna
at 2007-01-09T14:19
at 2007-01-09T14:19

By Bethany
at 2007-01-09T18:55
at 2007-01-09T18:55

By Aaliyah
at 2007-01-09T23:30
at 2007-01-09T23:30

By Ida
at 2007-01-10T04:06
at 2007-01-10T04:06

By Ophelia
at 2007-01-10T08:41
at 2007-01-10T08:41

By Dinah
at 2007-01-10T13:17
at 2007-01-10T13:17

By Sarah
at 2007-01-10T17:53
at 2007-01-10T17:53

By Susan
at 2007-01-10T22:28
at 2007-01-10T22:28

By Dorothy
at 2007-01-11T03:04
at 2007-01-11T03:04

By Gary
at 2007-01-11T07:39
at 2007-01-11T07:39

By Madame
at 2007-01-11T12:15
at 2007-01-11T12:15

By Lauren
at 2007-01-11T16:51
at 2007-01-11T16:51

By Anthony
at 2007-01-11T21:26
at 2007-01-11T21:26

By Hedwig
at 2007-01-12T02:02
at 2007-01-12T02:02

By George
at 2007-01-12T06:37
at 2007-01-12T06:37

By Annie
at 2007-01-12T11:13
at 2007-01-12T11:13

By Blanche
at 2007-01-12T15:49
at 2007-01-12T15:49

By Delia
at 2007-01-12T20:24
at 2007-01-12T20:24

By Puput
at 2007-01-13T01:00
at 2007-01-13T01:00

By Enid
at 2007-01-13T05:35
at 2007-01-13T05:35

By Susan
at 2007-01-13T10:11
at 2007-01-13T10:11

By Puput
at 2007-01-13T14:47
at 2007-01-13T14:47

By Madame
at 2007-01-13T19:22
at 2007-01-13T19:22

By Emily
at 2007-01-13T23:58
at 2007-01-13T23:58

By Rosalind
at 2007-01-14T04:33
at 2007-01-14T04:33

By Olivia
at 2007-01-14T09:09
at 2007-01-14T09:09

By Eartha
at 2007-01-14T13:45
at 2007-01-14T13:45

By Charlie
at 2007-01-14T18:20
at 2007-01-14T18:20

By Robert
at 2007-01-14T22:56
at 2007-01-14T22:56

By Lily
at 2007-01-15T03:31
at 2007-01-15T03:31

By Anonymous
at 2007-01-15T08:07
at 2007-01-15T08:07

By Sarah
at 2007-01-15T12:43
at 2007-01-15T12:43

By Hedy
at 2007-01-15T17:18
at 2007-01-15T17:18

By Barb Cronin
at 2007-01-15T21:54
at 2007-01-15T21:54

By William
at 2007-01-16T02:29
at 2007-01-16T02:29

By Ethan
at 2007-01-16T07:05
at 2007-01-16T07:05

By Agnes
at 2007-01-16T11:41
at 2007-01-16T11:41

By Faithe
at 2007-01-16T16:16
at 2007-01-16T16:16

By Quintina
at 2007-01-16T20:52
at 2007-01-16T20:52

By Jake
at 2007-01-17T01:27
at 2007-01-17T01:27

By Jessica
at 2007-01-17T06:03
at 2007-01-17T06:03

By Madame
at 2007-01-17T10:39
at 2007-01-17T10:39

By Zanna
at 2007-01-17T15:14
at 2007-01-17T15:14

By Lucy
at 2007-01-17T19:50
at 2007-01-17T19:50

By Bethany
at 2007-01-18T00:25
at 2007-01-18T00:25

By Queena
at 2007-01-18T05:01
at 2007-01-18T05:01

By Queena
at 2007-01-18T09:37
at 2007-01-18T09:37

By Una
at 2007-01-18T14:12
at 2007-01-18T14:12

By Eden
at 2007-01-18T18:48
at 2007-01-18T18:48

By Vanessa
at 2007-01-18T23:23
at 2007-01-18T23:23

By Emily
at 2007-01-19T03:59
at 2007-01-19T03:59

By Edwina
at 2007-01-19T08:35
at 2007-01-19T08:35

By Delia
at 2007-01-19T13:10
at 2007-01-19T13:10

By Quintina
at 2007-01-19T17:46
at 2007-01-19T17:46

By William
at 2007-01-19T22:21
at 2007-01-19T22:21

By Aaliyah
at 2007-01-20T02:57
at 2007-01-20T02:57

By Freda
at 2007-01-20T07:33
at 2007-01-20T07:33

By Frederica
at 2007-01-20T12:08
at 2007-01-20T12:08

By Elvira
at 2007-01-20T16:44
at 2007-01-20T16:44

By Eden
at 2007-01-20T21:19
at 2007-01-20T21:19

By Edith
at 2007-01-21T01:55
at 2007-01-21T01:55
Related Posts
Nets vs Bulls

By Tom
at 2007-01-06T18:15
at 2007-01-06T18:15
今日Kidd

By Ivy
at 2007-01-06T17:04
at 2007-01-06T17:04
久違了,三連勝!

By Edwina
at 2007-01-06T15:20
at 2007-01-06T15:20
Nets vs Bulls

By Charlie
at 2007-01-06T08:43
at 2007-01-06T08:43
Thorn mulls next Net move..

By Tom
at 2007-01-05T23:05
at 2007-01-05T23:05