Real Madrid 2 - 3 Chelsea - 切爾西足球俱樂部 Chelsea Football Club

Real Madrid 2 - 3 Chelsea

Rodrygo 80' 15' Mount, ast by Werner
Karim Benzema 96' 51' Rudiger, ast by Mount
75' Werner, ast by Kovacic

4 Shots on Target 7
6 Shots off Target 21
1 Corners 10
17 Fouls 20
0 Offsides 1
4 Saves 2
4 Yellow Cards 4
43% Possession 57%







Cards
=====================================================
Karim Benzema 37' 10' Reece James
Federico Valverde 68' 102' Hakim Ziyech
Eduardo Camavinga 90+1' 109' Kai Havertz
Dani Carvajal 118' 113' Cesar Azpilicueta





球場: Santiago Bernabeu, Madrid
觀眾: 59,839
開賽: 20:00 Tue, 12 Apr 2022
主裁: Szymon Marciniak



---------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2022/04/13/
the-debrief--blues-show-our-attacking-edge-but-cannot-reign-in-s

The Debrief: Blues show our attacking edge but cannot reign in Spain

13 Apr 2022


With the aid of diagrams and data, we take a close look at a Champions
League encounter that had everyone on the edge of their seats…


https://i.imgur.com/49eYb3J.png


That Chelsea played so well and scored freely on our a first-ever visit to
the Bernabeu, yet still fell short of turning round the first-leg deficit,
is probably a good indicator of why, since the Champions League format
started 30 years ago, only one side has ever recovered from losing by two
or more goals in their home leg first and gone on to win a knockout tie.


Last night the Blues were 10 minutes away from joining the Manchester
United side of 2019 who shocked PSG in Paris, but then Rodrygo equalised
from Luka Modric's stunningly incisive pass.


However before the game began to turn back Real Madrid's way, there is no
doubt Thomas Tuchel's side had been good value for our 3-0 lead.


== Attack, attack, attack ==


The stats back up what most watching must have been thinking, that the
visiting side from London were dominating.


The Blues had 57 per cent of the possession over the 120 minutes and by
most indicators of attacking play, were on top.


From a total of 90 attacking moves to Real's 46, there were 28 Chelsea
shots (six by Kai Havertz) to 10 from them. Seven of ours were on target
to four of theirs. We had to 10 corners compared with the Spaniards' one
and 11 of 26 Chelsea crosses reached a team-mate. Three of Real's 10 did
so.


https://i.imgur.com/iGJpBCj.jpg


Chelsea on the front foot and in control early on was in evidence for
Mason Mount's opening goal. From Marcos Alonso chesting down an aerial
clearance to Mount's fine finish, there were 29 passes involving every
outfielder apart from Kai Havertz.


== Committed Chelsea but ruthless Real ==


It certainly was not a case of adopting the classic away-team mode –
soaking up pressure and trying to hit our opponents on the break. There
was only one move that was classed as counter-attack in the entire game
from either side – that resulting in one of our shots on goal.


Importantly, following Tuchel lamenting a lack of our usual commitment in
the challenge in the home leg last week, in the Bernabeu we won 77 of the
duels to Madrid's 69, made one more successful tackle than them, and won
more than twice as many aerial contests.


But despite winning 3-2 on the night, we went out on aggregate when Real
hit back from a losing position, and there is no escaping their
ruthlessness in converting the chances that came their way over the two
games.


https://i.imgur.com/KfEgyCe.jpg


As well as Chelsea took our goals yesterday, the Expected Goal (xG) value
of 2.72 shows we were roughly on par with our three scored, whereas Real
with an xG of 1.23 overachieved in scoring twice. It was a similar story
to the first leg where they conjured up their three goals from an xG of
1.83 while we scored once with an expected 1.35.


'We played a fantastic match. We deserved what we had. We scored four
goals, we had big chances to score more. We were unlucky. We got beaten by
pure individual quality and offensive conversion,' said Tuchel afterwards,
with reference to Marcos Alonso's disallowed goal.


The big chances he noted numbered five in the stats count, four of them
missed. Real scored both their big chances.


== Two up, sometimes two behind ==


Tuchel largely based his formation in Spain on the one deployed so
effectively in the 6-0 win at Southampton in the previous game, albeit
with plenty of fluidity and changes of shape whether in or out of
possession.


With one change, Reece James rather than Andreas Christensen was asked to
be the most direct opponent to Vinicius Junior. James made eight
successful tackles, three more than anyone else on the pitch.


Toni Rudiger, talking after the game, highlighted the role Ruben
Loftus-Cheek, nominally our right wing-back, had in joining Mason Mount in
a no.10 role, to exploit space between Real's most central midfielder
Casemiro and their defence.


https://i.imgur.com/x1ogtDq.jpg
Loftus-Cheek is 12, Werner 11, Mount 19


The average position map below shows Mount and Timo Werner in that area,
and how Loftus-Cheek was more often upfield compard with Alonso on the
other side. It contrasts with the positions at Southampton below it.


https://i.imgur.com/uSpoUDD.jpg


The new attacking shape used in the two games with Mount more central
behind Werner appears to be benefitting them both. They have three goals
apiece from the two outings with Mount claiming two assists and Werner
one. That was after a month in which neither scored.


Mount now has 20 goals and 21 assists over the past two seasons. In Madrid
he also supplied four key passes, as did Alonso.


https://i.imgur.com/HAAIkr8.jpg
Mount was voted Man of the Match by fans on The 5th Stand


The win on the night, that sets a new all-time club record of eight for
consecutive away wins in all competitions, means Chelsea have only lost
once in our past 15 matches against La Liga teams in Spain.


However having reached the Champions League quarter-finals, we do not go
through to the semi-finals for only the second time in 10 attempts having
reached that stage of the competition.

--

"Fighting the war on drugs... one brutality case at a time."

"Girl, you can't even call this shit a war." "Why not?"

"Wars end." - The Wire: Season 1, Episode 1

--