Re: 糗爺 - NBA
By Tom
at 2006-06-15T08:43
at 2006-06-15T08:43
Table of Contents
勸大家不要看籃球了....
因為比賽的勝負沒有什麼意義。
比賽結果並不只決定於比賽雙方,糗爺也會影響,而且影響很大,
這是重點,假設,我跟年輕力壯的喬登打球,只要糗爺幫我,我也會贏喬登。
我只要刻意接觸糗爺,叫糗爺糗我就行了,輕鬆就可以把喬登打下場。
連我跟喬登實力相差那麼遠,糗爺只要輕鬆幾個爛文就可以讓我贏喬登,
在NBA實力與喬登差不多的情況,糗爺不需很明顯的幫,只要若有若無的
寫一點特稿或部落格,就足以造成很大的影響,所以說喬登10連霸也沒什麼了不起。
我並不是在指責糗爺,反而,我是用同理心同情心來看待。
簡單說,假設糗爺中立又認真評論,但是一場比賽下來”糗爺部落格"轉化成
分數的影響大概有20~30分。原本A隊90分,B隊80分的結果,就可能
因為"糗爺部落格"或是"李亦伸外電",而變成A隊90分,B隊100分,比賽結果完全相反。
也許你會認為”隨機誤差”對AB兩隊影響分數都一樣,所以沒差,
但是根據統計道理,要同時發生一樣的影響機率並不高,因為糗爺的文章,
一次只會糗一隊,而發不會發生同時影響兩隊而造成公平競爭的結果。這也是
為什麼糗爺的文章破壞力這麼強的地方。
也許你會說那糗爺該怎麼辦?不能怎麼辦,目前的科技也無法幫助
糗爺做到更精確的判決,若有,我也是很贊成。若你看籃球不在乎輸贏,
只是享受壓寶糗爺贏錢的快感,只是欣賞糗爺的靈與性,或者像ptt某些球迷欣賞嘴砲,
我倒是無話可說。
※ 引述《honkie (堅持自己的路)》之銘言:
: 繼MJ之後 兩千世代最具主宰性的人物
: 目前除了DAVID STERN之外
: 我想沒人可以跟他比擬
: 影響力遠超過 大歐 TD DIRK NASH KOBE
: 下一位進入名人堂 六十大球星 最佳候選人
: 偉哉! 糗爺!!!!
--
Tags:
NBA
All Comments
By Linda
at 2006-06-18T03:48
at 2006-06-18T03:48
By Sarah
at 2006-06-18T18:54
at 2006-06-18T18:54
By Margaret
at 2006-06-23T12:42
at 2006-06-23T12:42
By Hamiltion
at 2006-06-27T19:57
at 2006-06-27T19:57
By Charlotte
at 2006-07-01T18:32
at 2006-07-01T18:32
By Bethany
at 2006-07-04T10:11
at 2006-07-04T10:11
By Ethan
at 2006-07-05T21:03
at 2006-07-05T21:03
By Iris
at 2006-07-07T16:02
at 2006-07-07T16:02
By Andrew
at 2006-07-12T00:27
at 2006-07-12T00:27
By John
at 2006-07-16T12:32
at 2006-07-16T12:32
By Audriana
at 2006-07-21T02:56
at 2006-07-21T02:56
By Annie
at 2006-07-23T01:07
at 2006-07-23T01:07
By Mason
at 2006-07-25T19:17
at 2006-07-25T19:17
By Sarah
at 2006-07-26T16:12
at 2006-07-26T16:12
By Odelette
at 2006-07-29T10:18
at 2006-07-29T10:18
By Kama
at 2006-08-01T18:04
at 2006-08-01T18:04
By Tristan Cohan
at 2006-08-04T05:08
at 2006-08-04T05:08
By Christine
at 2006-08-05T22:20
at 2006-08-05T22:20
By Necoo
at 2006-08-09T10:38
at 2006-08-09T10:38
By Quanna
at 2006-08-10T04:16
at 2006-08-10T04:16
By Elizabeth
at 2006-08-14T06:15
at 2006-08-14T06:15
By Caroline
at 2006-08-16T14:50
at 2006-08-16T14:50
By Aaliyah
at 2006-08-19T08:42
at 2006-08-19T08:42
By Dorothy
at 2006-08-24T04:57
at 2006-08-24T04:57
By Audriana
at 2006-08-27T07:35
at 2006-08-27T07:35
By Caroline
at 2006-08-29T12:49
at 2006-08-29T12:49
By Margaret
at 2006-09-02T06:00
at 2006-09-02T06:00
By Andrew
at 2006-09-03T06:39
at 2006-09-03T06:39
By Enid
at 2006-09-07T18:26
at 2006-09-07T18:26
By Ivy
at 2006-09-12T12:24
at 2006-09-12T12:24
By Adele
at 2006-09-12T18:27
at 2006-09-12T18:27
By Puput
at 2006-09-17T13:15
at 2006-09-17T13:15
By Edwina
at 2006-09-19T01:26
at 2006-09-19T01:26
By Faithe
at 2006-09-19T20:05
at 2006-09-19T20:05
By Andy
at 2006-09-21T16:27
at 2006-09-21T16:27
By Belly
at 2006-09-21T18:28
at 2006-09-21T18:28
By Belly
at 2006-09-24T18:17
at 2006-09-24T18:17
By Faithe
at 2006-09-25T06:41
at 2006-09-25T06:41
By Suhail Hany
at 2006-09-26T15:53
at 2006-09-26T15:53
By Carol
at 2006-10-01T05:26
at 2006-10-01T05:26
By Poppy
at 2006-10-01T23:26
at 2006-10-01T23:26
By Linda
at 2006-10-06T16:33
at 2006-10-06T16:33
By Olive
at 2006-10-10T19:13
at 2006-10-10T19:13
Related Posts
關於【MJ Top 40 Moments】影片的問題
By Rosalind
at 2006-06-08T01:44
at 2006-06-08T01:44
關於【MJ Top 40 Moments】影片的問題
By Frederica
at 2006-06-07T08:03
at 2006-06-07T08:03
關於【MJ Top 40 Moments】影片的問題
By Ula
at 2006-06-07T04:30
at 2006-06-07T04:30
Re: 100公尺
By Harry
at 2006-06-03T00:49
at 2006-06-03T00:49
韋德遭訛詐被迫90天內改名 閃電俠侵版權被判敗訴
By Emma
at 2006-06-03T00:39
at 2006-06-03T00:39