Muhammed Lawal vs Mikhail Zayats - 綜合格鬥 Mixed Martial Arts

Table of Contents

※ 引述《KakutougiFan (轉變在不知不覺中發生)》之銘言:
: http://ppt.cc/CkBf
: ROUND 1
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 2
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 3
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats (30-27 Zayats)
: THE OFFICIAL RESULT
: Muhammed “King Mo” Lawal Def. Mikhail Zayats Decision (Unanimous) R3 5:00
: [30-27, 30-27, 30-27]

請問為何這場是Unanimous Decision,不是有兩位裁判給Lawal(29-28),
一位給Zayats(30-27),最後三個30-27的比分又是怎麼來?有誰可以解釋一下???

--

All Comments

Blanche avatarBlanche2014-03-03
一個是sherdog網站的評分, 最下面是大會裁判評分..
Sierra Rose avatarSierra Rose2014-03-07
樓上講得沒錯, 另外我內心覺得美國比賽很重角力優勢
Michael avatarMichael2014-03-07
給分並不認同, 第三回合king mo只不過個角力優勢就拿
Enid avatarEnid2014-03-09
到這回合, 我認為很不合理但現在UFC跟Bellator就是這
Jack avatarJack2014-03-12
樣給分, 幾場比賽為例: Davis判定勝Machida顯示出角
Jake avatarJake2014-03-14
力優勢高於打擊, Ben Henderson判定勝Thomson顯示打
Cara avatarCara2014-03-17
擊優勢高於巴柔優勢