來源：https://reurl.cc/NZq1xQ
內文：
"Not this year!"
The Blazers broadcast after Steph got a no-call on a three
在Steph三分買犯規沒成功後，
拓荒者主播說：「今年買不到啦！」
-
從前陣子發布的消息，Curry這球不只是no-call，甚至應該有進攻犯規的吹判空間吧？
https://reurl.cc/GbeZ9v
This play should result in a no-call, as the offensive player leans into the d
efensive player (at an abnormal angle), but the contact was marginal. If the o
ffensive player had initiated more than marginal contact, an offensive foul wo
uld be the correct call. (4/7)
這個回合應該無任何吹判，因為進攻球員靠在防守球員身上（以不正常的角度），但接觸
不算太大。如果進攻球員此次製造的身體接觸過大，那麼進攻犯規才是正確的判決。
-
不知道今年裁判尺度能否讓大眾更能接受呢？
--
內文：
"Not this year!"
The Blazers broadcast after Steph got a no-call on a three
在Steph三分買犯規沒成功後，
拓荒者主播說：「今年買不到啦！」
-
從前陣子發布的消息，Curry這球不只是no-call，甚至應該有進攻犯規的吹判空間吧？
https://reurl.cc/GbeZ9v
This play should result in a no-call, as the offensive player leans into the d
efensive player (at an abnormal angle), but the contact was marginal. If the o
ffensive player had initiated more than marginal contact, an offensive foul wo
uld be the correct call. (4/7)
這個回合應該無任何吹判，因為進攻球員靠在防守球員身上（以不正常的角度），但接觸
不算太大。如果進攻球員此次製造的身體接觸過大，那麼進攻犯規才是正確的判決。
-
不知道今年裁判尺度能否讓大眾更能接受呢？
--
All Comments