Billups：我其實也不懂三角戰術... - NBA

擷取重點段落...


Jackson also will have approximately $25 million to spend in free agency this
summer, when guads Reggie Jackson, Rajon Rondo and Goran Dragic are expected
to hit the open market.

今年夏天，尼克大約會有2500萬鎂的薪資空間可操作。
Reggie Jackson,、Rajon Rondo、Goran Dragic在今夏都將成為自由球員。

Jackson noted that he doesn't necessarily need to bring in a guard who can
penetrate, so he could also go after a slashing wing player.

"禪師"Phil Jackson同時意識到他不一定要替球隊找來一個能切入攻擊的後衛，
他也可以為球隊帶回一個鋒線球員。

Billups not sold on triangle: Jackson said he plans to use the triangle
offense as a selling point with free agents this summer. At least one former
NBA player thinks that’s a bad idea.

而禪師打算用"三角戰術"來當作一個可以吸引自由球員加盟的點。
但前NBA球星Chauncey Billups認為那個是糟糕的主意。

“I don’t know about that triangle,” ESPN analyst Chauncey Billups said on
the “The Knicks Blog with Anthony Donahue” radio show. “The game is just
different now. ... Look at the point-guard position right now; these guys are
playmakers.

Billups表示：

「我自己也不瞭解三角戰術，現在的比賽型態跟以前不同了，
看看現在的PG，他們才是攻勢的發動機。」

“They come down, they score, they’re playmakers. They need pick-and-rolls.
You put one of those guys in the triangle offense, where it’s kind of just
slow down, pass, cut -- it’s no real NBA playmaking ability. It’s no
pick-and-roll stuff, it’s no pindown to the post, no counteraction.
Obviously that offense won a lot of championships. But it was curtailed to
the personnel that they had.”

「他們上場後能得分、能組織，他們需要打檔拆。
如果你把這樣的球員放在三角戰術中，會降低他們的速度。

傳&切不再是NBA真正的進攻組織技能了，
比賽也不再只有檔拆、低位牽制、或者單純身體對抗。

很明顯三角戰術拿了很多冠軍，但他們必須要有他們需要的球員才行。」

Billups added: “You look at Shaq in the triangle -- there’s really no big
man in the game like that today. It’s a guard’s game. The game is small, it
’s a guard’s game. I got my reservations about the triangle, I really do.”

Billups還提到：

「看看Shaq在三角戰術中的表現，現在根本沒有大個子有這樣的表現，
現在都是後衛的天下了。所以對於三角戰術，我持保留意見。」



詳細全文：http://ppt.cc/kR-F

--

有幾句翻得不太好，請不吝指教

所以三角戰術會弱化PG，因為PG不是攻勢發動機，是這樣嗎？

--