90年代的溫網是否真的很乏味? - 網球 Tennis

http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Tennis/2011/06/25/Wimbledon-Diary-Day-Five.aspx

ATPWorldTour.com takes a look at the news and talking points at The
Championships, celebrating its 125th year, on Friday.

What The Newspapers Are Saying

Current Generation More Enjoyable
Rafael Nadal believes previous tennis eras cannot match the excitement
generated by the current stars of the sport. "Personally, to watch a Pete
Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players,
is not enjoyable," the 10-time major champion told The Evening Standard.

納豆個人認為山大王跟伊凡的比賽

或者類似這種類型球員之間的比賽並不精采



"It's not really tennis, it is a few swings of the racquet. It was less
eye-catching than what we do now. Everyone enjoys the tennis we play much
more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis, just more enjoyable
tennis. For me, in the past it was just serve, serve, serve." Mats Wilander,
the seven-time Grand Slam champion, says there is greater depth today. "If
you go down to the 100th-ranked player, we weren't as deep as they are
today," said Wilander. "But the first seven or eight guys were at the same
level and produced great rivalries. Looking back, it was really special."

納豆說過去網球不是真正的網球

來回對拍少 不像現在有很多精采好球

他表示他並非認為現代網球技巧比較好

但他認為現代網球就是比較好看

對他而言 過去的網球只是發球、發球、發球。



============================================================

昨天主播提到最近這個熱門話題

並且問乃哥對於現今網壇與過去網壇相比 有什麼看法？

乃哥說：「我可以很肯定的跟你說，Nadal說的絕對是錯的，那時候他還太小！」

之後就立刻進廣告......


然後廣告回來 主播抓到一個空檔又問乃哥剛剛的問題

乃哥停了有十秒左右 （好像還無視話題 談現場比賽 一時尷尬了一下）


後來自己又轉回這個話題

他大略是說 姑且不論過去跟現在網壇哪個比較好

但是他不能認同Nadal在外電說「以前的網球不是真的網球」

他質疑：「如果以前打的不叫網球 那叫做什麼？」

=======================================================


Nadal想表達的應該只是現在的比賽比較有可看性

但不代表相對比較有技巧或具有對抗性

所以還算是尊重以前的球員啦～

這我個人認為應該算中肯


不過講It's not really tennis

似乎就太重了一點！！

但這應該不是他主要想表達的意思

不過就是一句承接上下文的話而已吧～



--