2014澳網R4 R.Nadal d. K.Nishikori - 網球 Tennis

By Ina
at 2014-01-20T21:36

Table of Contents

上一篇我在費版po的數據文被轉，底下推文討論得如此熱烈，剛好讓我看到兩行～

推 bobjohns:納豆那場也順便po一下01/20 21:10

推 gwotie:不就是個數據文....發別人的應該也都可以吧= =01/20 21:36

既然都有人說了，我反正無事就順手從官網複製貼上，何況這場比賽確實精彩。

R.Nadal 7(7 7 7(7

K.Nishikori 6(3 5 6(3

Time by Set: 65 62 70

MATCH STATISTICS

R.Nadal K.Nishikori
Aces 12 2
Double faults 1 1
1st serves in 88/124 (71 %) 76/115 (66 %)
1st serve points won 67/88 (76 %) 51/76 (67 %)
2nd serve points won 14/36 (39 %) 16/39 (41 %)
Fastest serve 202 KMH 199 KMH
Average 1st serve speed 185 KMH 178 KMH
Average 2nd serve speed 148 KMH 148 KMH
Net points won 10/19 (53 %) 20/25 (80 %)
Break points won 5/8 (63 %) 4/10 (40 %)
Receiving points won 48/115 (42 %) 43/124 (35 %)
Winners 36 36
Unforced errors 28 51
Total points won 129 110

這場確實值得po數據，各盤晚點有空補上。

set1

R.Nadal K.Nishikori
Aces 6 0
Double faults 0 0
1st serves in 36/47 (77 %) 26/42 (62 %)
1st serve points won 28/36 (78 %) 17/26 (65 %)
2nd serve points won 3/11 (27 %) 8/16 (50 %)
Net points won 2/5 (40 %) 7/10 (70 %)
Break points won　　　1/4 (25 %) 1/2 (50 %)　　　
Receiving points won 17/42 (40 %) 16/47 (34 %)
Winners 13 10
Unforced errors 13 17
Total points won 48 41

set2

R.Nadal K.Nishikori
Aces 1 1
Double faults 0 1
1st serves in 21/32 (66 %) 21/35 (60 %)
1st serve points won 17/21 (81 %) 15/21 (71 %)
2nd serve points won 6/11 (55 %) 5/14 (36 %)
Net points won 5/7 (71 %) 9/10 (90 %)
Break points won　　　　2/2 (100 %) 1/2 (50 %)
Receiving points won 15/35 (43 %) 9/32 (28 %)
Winners 11 12
Unforced errors 9 16
Total points won 38 29

set3

R.Nadal K.Nishikori
Aces 5 1
Double faults 1 0
1st serves in 31/45 (69 %) 29/38 (76 %)
1st serve points won 22/31 (71 %) 19/29 (66 %)
2nd serve points won 5/14 (36 %) 3/9 (33 %)
Net points won 3/7 (43 %) 4/5 (80 %)
Break points won　 2/2 (100 %) 2/6 (33 %) 　　　　　
Receiving points won 16/38 (42 %) 18/45 (40 %)
Winners 12 14
Unforced errors 6 18
Total points won 43 40

不過就是po個數據，官網複製貼上就是了，何必火氣這麼大呢？^.<

--
笑看。

--

Tags: 網球

All Comments

By Jake
at 2014-01-24T08:00

納豆那場也順便po一下

By David
at 2014-01-27T18:24

不就是個數據文....發別人的應該也都可以吧= =

By Olive
at 2014-01-31T04:49

By Irma
at 2014-02-03T15:13

錦織圭很可惜 UE太多了

By Donna
at 2014-02-07T01:37

平衡報導，頗幽默

By Cara
at 2014-02-10T12:01

錦織圭真的很可惜~

By Quintina
at 2014-02-13T22:25

ue太多很可惜不然其他部分表現真的非常好

By Linda
at 2014-02-17T08:50

XDDDDDDDDDDD

By Zanna
at 2014-02-20T19:14

這場小圭惜敗表現的算不錯了 UE太多其實蠻多是被逼的= =

By Dorothy
at 2014-02-24T05:38

這場很好看

By Callum
at 2014-02-27T16:02

豆豆的ACE是亮點不過小圭真的進步好多

By Daph Bay
at 2014-03-03T02:26

跟納豆打球UE多很常見吧

By Yuri
at 2014-03-06T12:51

比賽真的很精彩很接近

By Lucy
at 2014-03-09T23:15

納豆失誤少，對方常常會失誤較多，打不死呀！

By Caitlin
at 2014-03-13T09:39

他很有機會幹掉那豆欸!

By Rebecca
at 2014-03-16T20:03

小圭的抗壓性還不夠關鍵時刻一直噴大UE

By Edith
at 2014-03-20T06:27

我期待.......

By Faithe
at 2014-03-23T16:52

期待前一篇那些酸說16強有甚麼好po的人出來講講話怎麼沒出來說這篇為何po呢？差別待遇這麼明顯？

By Lucy
at 2014-03-27T03:16

擺明見到費就酸阿，好小的度量，哈哈哈

By Yedda
at 2014-03-30T13:40

阿圭打這樣是相當厲害，能逼 Nadal逼成這樣的沒幾個

By Bethany
at 2014-04-03T00:04

相當看好他今年的表現

By Jack
at 2014-04-06T10:28

原po的下面那段話沒看清楚是吧?不是擺明了嗎?

By Bethany
at 2014-04-09T20:53

差別待遇XD 這種費迷特地PO別的球員的數據文當然沒人酸

By Frederica
at 2014-04-13T07:17

若是豆迷來PO納豆數據文也沒人酸再來說是差別待遇吧

By Agnes
at 2014-04-16T17:41

也就這時候會這麼熱鬧...酸費的人大概也很愛看費的比賽吧

By Wallis
at 2014-04-20T04:05

特地po不是更該酸嗎，這場16強沒打五盤耶~XD

By Isabella
at 2014-04-23T14:29

上一篇酸的人明明不是豆粉為什麼豆子得被拖出來倘槍?

By Liam
at 2014-04-27T00:54

錦織圭也太可惜

By Quintina
at 2014-04-30T11:18

簡單來說這篇就是反串文啊酸酸也是很明察秋毫的

By Carol
at 2014-05-03T21:42

不會亂酸無關球星

By Barb Cronin
at 2014-05-07T08:06

其實以"正常"眼光來看就是篇數據文有些人還毫不掩飾自己就是要酸也滿奇特的一點都不反串呀這篇 @@

By Callum
at 2014-05-10T18:30

是不是反串自在人心我是豆迷看到這種數據文也不會多開心

By Harry
at 2014-05-14T04:55

我早就料到豆豆又要出來救援了...

By Selena
at 2014-05-17T15:19

如果只是數據文當然沒什麼,不過原PO加了那幾行個人意見就讓人覺得有點故意.....

By Suhail Hany
at 2014-05-21T01:43

看不出哪裡故意耶

By Jacob
at 2014-05-24T12:07

建議原PO把所有修飾文字修掉，可以惹來不必要的爭論

By Susan
at 2014-05-27T22:31

不過就是po個數據，官網複製貼上就是了，何必火氣這麼大呢？

By Adele
at 2014-05-31T08:56

故意什麼？故意PO數據嗎？所以到底是要PO還是不PO

By Suhail Hany
at 2014-06-03T19:20

要以怎樣的形式PO才是非故意 @@

By Margaret
at 2014-06-07T05:44

原PO真的很倒楣......

By Belly
at 2014-06-10T16:08

有這種文章也難怪費爸老是被酸

By Elizabeth
at 2014-06-14T02:32

就純PO數據別家那些文字不就好了~.~

By Steve
at 2014-06-17T12:57

加那些文字究竟有甚麼問題？應該要問問看的人怎麼這麼無聊吧？數據文加上心得犯了啥錯呀

By Cara
at 2014-06-20T23:21

這種擺明著因為po費的數據文被酸所以費迷把豆也拖下水

By Suhail Hany
at 2014-06-24T09:45

被說是反串自清一下又怎樣了啦

By Poppy
at 2014-06-27T20:09

原PO非數據的文字不是本場比賽的心得吧!

By Elvira
at 2014-07-01T06:33

也不需要把上篇文章的推文貼上去啊!

By Victoria
at 2014-07-04T16:58

啊就有人要求順便po這篇啊，原po解釋一下也不行?

By Ina
at 2014-07-08T03:22

隨便啦~~很感謝原PO願意PO數據文可是真的覺得不需要加其他東西就是了

By Wallis
at 2014-07-11T13:46

對於兩邊都喜歡的人來說這板真的很怪怎麼樣都是故意

By Zenobia
at 2014-07-15T00:10

這篇心得是回應上篇推文的人的

By Queena
at 2014-07-18T10:34

原PO大概只是想緩和一下氣氛也太倒楣了點

By Sandy
at 2014-07-21T20:59

同意ffint! 不過原po正處於被攻擊的狀態，就算了吧...

By Tracy
at 2014-07-25T07:23

就算沒這篇文章.費爸再上一篇也被酸了不是?

By Charlotte
at 2014-07-28T17:47

費爸被酸不是重點重點是費迷為何要在這時間點po這文會被認為是反串也是當然

By Zenobia
at 2014-08-01T04:11

*有這種文章也難怪費爸老是被酸* 那這句應該改成費迷

By Ursula
at 2014-08-04T14:35

其實看起來認為是反串的不多啦...

By Hardy
at 2014-08-08T01:00

沒人會真正討厭球員會討厭大多是因為球迷的關係

By Iris
at 2014-08-11T11:24

所以討厭球迷->酸所有球迷or酸球員您會認為是正確的??還是是否應該是違反版規去檢舉才是正確的?

By Sarah
at 2014-08-14T21:48

難不成費迷不能PO別的球員的比賽數據嗎？

By Rosalind
at 2014-08-18T08:12

酸酸正不正確不甘我的事我只是不爽把別的球員拖下水

By Jack
at 2014-08-21T18:36

可以啊費迷要po就po吧

By Tristan Cohan
at 2014-08-25T05:01

到底這篇是哪裡害到哪些別的球員了？

By Tristan Cohan
at 2014-08-28T15:25

PO比賽數據是把其他球員拖下水喔.....Orz

By Christine
at 2014-09-01T01:49

覺得不用補開頭那幾句話，純粹PO數據就OK了~~(感謝原PO分享)

By Madame
at 2014-09-04T12:13

不過就是篇數據到底酸到了什麼?

By Elvira
at 2014-09-07T22:37

在費數據文剛被酸完的時候由費迷來po豆數據文

By John
at 2014-09-11T09:02

豆迷表達不爽而已當然po文是個人自由但有些非數據的心得看了礙眼

By Erin
at 2014-09-14T19:26

球迷不是非費即豆，更有可能兩邊都喜歡，只能說

By Joseph
at 2014-09-18T05:50

大家不要吵架~

By Anonymous
at 2014-09-21T16:14

你這樣實在很累，猜疑來猜疑去，人生沒那麼狹隘

By Xanthe
at 2014-09-25T02:38

那你就要問上一篇提到納豆的版友什麼要把他扯進來(攤手)

By Ophelia
at 2014-09-28T13:03

原Po有權利po文每個人都有權表達想法就是這樣子囉

By Odelette
at 2014-10-01T23:27

PO個數據文也可以戰~

By Erin
at 2014-10-05T09:51

沒辦法現在是大賽期間

By Jacky
at 2014-10-08T20:15

誠摯推薦宋晶宜雅量請大家閱讀 XDDDD

By Hamiltion
at 2014-10-12T06:39

J86好奇怪喔，明明就是有人要求納豆的也po一下

By Zenobia
at 2014-10-15T17:04

應觀眾要求而已，您們好難伺候~~

By Elizabeth
at 2014-10-19T03:28

jou你也滿奇怪的非要在豆數據文下扯酸酸

By Candice
at 2014-10-22T13:52

因為時間點不對吧 @@

By Agnes
at 2014-10-26T00:16

還要被你說成把納豆拉下水？你邏輯是否有點怪怪的

By Bennie
at 2014-10-29T10:40

在網球版波數據文也有事 @@ 要這樣猜忌實在很無聊

By Hedy
at 2014-11-01T21:05

如果上面那篇的推文有人說貼個Djo或穆雷的數據，那原po也不會貼這篇，你要怪也怪對人好嗎？

By Iris
at 2014-11-05T07:29

最先把豆拖下水的就是你啊說那些酸酸怎麼不來酸這篇

By Elizabeth
at 2014-11-08T17:53

Joulin可以不要引戰嗎？

By Rachel
at 2014-11-12T04:17

jj要吵架用水球吧...

By Edwina
at 2014-11-15T14:41

還有，回應f大，如果原po不加入那些話說明po的原因，恐怕

By Olivia
at 2014-11-19T01:06

不錯喔繼續吧

By Skylar Davis
at 2014-11-22T11:30

有更多人誤以為原po固意拖納豆下水吧~

By Kelly
at 2014-11-25T21:54

還有，上篇酸的不是豆迷？？酸最大的tinybaby大被逐出了？

By James
at 2014-11-29T08:18

它是Djo迷

By Elma
at 2014-12-02T18:42

我引戰？恩，好吧，非我所願，如果真是如此，我道歉就此打住吧

By Regina
at 2014-12-06T05:07

我只是覺得推文若要求l大po其他球員的數據，他也會po

By Lily
at 2014-12-09T15:31

j86過於敏感? 還是只行我酸人不准人酸我

By Susan
at 2014-12-13T01:55

絕對沒有什麼刻意要拖誰下水

By Hedda
at 2014-12-16T12:19

我知道他是Djo球迷但我一直覺得他也是納豆迷~因為我有看

By Elvira
at 2014-12-19T22:43

納費迷不用爭拉都去睡覺吧冠軍就是喬神別在那戰拉

By Kristin
at 2014-12-23T09:08

到過一些推文他看起來應該也喜歡納豆，如果不是，是我誤會

By Victoria
at 2014-12-26T19:32

我道歉，對不起~不過，我真的是看不慣有人在上一篇酸

By Enid
at 2014-12-30T05:56

完全不覺得他喜歡豆啊!充其量也只是不討厭吧!

By Elizabeth
at 2015-01-02T16:20

才說那些話，如果因此引起大家的激動，我很抱歉！

By Barb Cronin
at 2015-01-06T02:44

看不懂戰點@@ 跪求懶人包

By Caroline
at 2015-01-09T13:09

都是樓上太強的錯(誤

By Jack
at 2015-01-12T23:33

都是樓樓上太強的錯(無誤

By Ophelia
at 2015-01-16T09:57

推!!! 納豆加油!!! 穩扎穩打順利進決賽!!! go~~~

By Audriana
at 2015-01-19T20:21

j86上篇不是跟tiny一起站在酸費的那邊嗎是只准我酸人不准人酸我?

By Odelette
at 2015-01-23T06:45

還要繼續戰喔

By Sarah
at 2015-01-26T17:10

差不多了吧總之恭喜費爸跟錦織圭都打出場好球數據也很有趣

By Quanna
at 2015-01-30T03:34

打到鞋子破掉也太好笑了XD

By Margaret
at 2015-02-02T13:58

納豆今天的表現算失誤比較多的

By Leila
at 2015-02-06T00:22

沒看比賽。看上網數據，Nadal 今天的穿越有失手吧？？

By Linda
at 2015-02-09T10:46

是自己上網一直打飛

By Genevieve
at 2015-02-12T21:11

不要過於敏感了這篇根本沒有拖納豆下水的意思

By Sarah
at 2015-02-16T07:35

錦織圭好可惜...每一盤都纏鬥說-.-

By Aaliyah
at 2015-02-19T17:59

本討論已失焦,即刻進行鎖文動作

2014澳網R4 R.Nadal d. K.Nishikori - 網球 Tennis

All Comments

Related Posts

2014 AO R4 R.Federer d. J.Tsonga

Federer的強勢回歸(內有發雞排)

納達爾質疑裁判警告不合時宜

男單世界排名前25名 (澳網八強後)

2014 澳網彭謝雙打后座留言集氣送紅包活動